History Coursework: Local Study, Stanton Drew Stone Circles

Authors Avatar

History Coursework: Local Study, Stanton Drew Stone Circles

Hypothesis: “The Stone Circles at Stanton Drew were built purely for religious reasons”

Question 1:What can you learn from your site investigation about the Stone Circles at Stanton Drew?

The stone circles at Stanton Drew have plagued the minds of historians and archeologists for centuries, and also produced wild fairy tales of the upmost imagination. However what I am going to try and establish is weather  “The Stone Circles at Stanton Drew were built purely for religious reasons”, or if they were built for another reason, and in that case what and how have I come to that conclusion.

To try and conclude on this topic I am going to rely on primary data which I will collect from the site and also secondary sources which have been provided. I visited the Stanton Drew area on the 11th October 2001.

Stanton Drew is located in the south west of England. It is south of Bristol and is adjacent to the B 3130. This established village houses approximately 1000 residents, and has a church, one pub, a phone box, a village hall and a post box. The roads through Stanton Drew are fairly narrow. This tells me that the settlement here is established, as well as the christianic religion.

 The Chew River, originating from the mendips, running through the valley gives an adequate water supply around the years and the addition of  Chew Valley lake (resevoir) also helps provide water for Bristol and the surrounding area.

The stone circles are located in the north east part of the village, near to chew river and opposite the B3130.

From this information above I can establish that the Chew Valley area is and was a fertile area for growth and prosperous life. This shows me the reasons for a settlement being established in the area was that the area has fertile soil and a plentiful water supply.

 The main circle consists of 28 stones (30 originally), 2 stones have been located using probes. Only 4 stones in this circle remain standing the rest are recumbent.

The circumference of the circle is 351.85m this was calculated by using half of the diameter and substituting it into the formula 2πr. The diameter was 112m or 368ft this gave me a radius of the circle being 56m. The average distance between the stones (along a straight line) was 7.4m and the average height of the stones (the four remaining standing) was 2.47m. This tells me that the main circle has been vandalised over the years. This is because only four stones remain standing in the circle and the rest are recumbent or buried. This is most likely to have been vandalised by the Christian church. This is further demonstrated in legends about the stones, further explained in question 3. The size of this circle is also very important, this is because it shows that the Neolithic people who constructed this monument had dedication and good organisation to construct this monument. This is shown by the construction of the circle.

The North East circle consists of 8 stones (circle intact) four of which are still standing and the other four are recumbent. However as you can see in the south of this circle the there is a mass of stones which have been attacked and so have fallen and this area has become a mess of stone (see fig ).  This ‘mass of stone’ was probably originally the start of an avenue. The average distance apart from the stones is 7.8 m and the average height of the stones which are still standing is 3.12m.  These measurements tell me again that the Neolithic people who constructed these circles had dedication to the constrution reason for these stone circles. In addition to that the average distance apart of stones in this circle is quite similar to the main circle, however this distance is probably a miss calculation and the relationship is probably false because the distance between the stones detwermines the size of the circle and the size of the north east circle is significantly smaller than the main circle.

The South West circle consists of 12 stones all recumbent and buried. This circle lies in ruins and on private land. The average distance between the stones is 6.9m, again this measurement is close to the other measurements but because the south west circle is is ruins this measurement is again probably false from the original size between the stones because the size of the stones above ground would probably grow smaller when above ground. The diameter of this circle is 41.4m across with this measurement I can calulate the circumference of the circle by halfing the diameter to get the radius and then using that number in the formula 2πr. When I did this the answer I got was 130m. This information I gathered on the south west circle shows me that it has been subject to large scale vandelism and so this may also be used on other monuments around the settlement.

Join now!

The stones which aren’t buried and still mostly visable, can be compared to similarities between the shape of the stone and some male genitels. This depiction of the male reproductive organ is probably in cooperation with the religious possibility, this is because the reason for such depiction is the demonstration of fertility.

In summary the factor of the dedication to building such a large monument means that the tribe/tribes which had built needed good organisation and also dedication to the reason/reasons for construction of the circle. In addition to that the factor of such wide scale vandelism may cloud some ...

This is a preview of the whole essay