• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I have to find the maximum area for a given perimeter (1000m) in this project. I am going to start examining the rectangle because it is by far the easiest shape to work with and is used lots in places

Extracts from this document...


Amir Taaki        Maths Fencing project

I have to find the maximum area for a given perimeter (1000m) in this project.  I am going to start examining the rectangle because it is by far the easiest shape to work with and is used lots in places (most things use rectangles for design- basic cube .etc). To start with what type of rectangle gives the best result.

A regular square or an irregular oblong?

I start by having 4 individual squares.



                                Goes toimage00.pngimage00.png


                                                 Regular square                   irregular oblong

Now look at how many sides are exposed on each shape-

∑ sides of each cube internal1                                                       ∑ sides of each cube internal2

Ratio for square =                                                      ratio for oblong  =image02.pngimage03.png

∑ sides of each cube exposed1                                   ∑ sides of each cube exposed2

                               2 × 4                                                                    (1 × 2) + (2 × 2)

             =                                                          =image05.pngimage04.png

                2 × 4                                                (3 × 2)  + (2 × 2)

             =         1                                                                          =  0.6

This can be further done by having more squares (to show that the more irregular a square is the less area it has for that given perimeter.

BUT if we want the same perimeter (which we do) we have to take away a square for the irregular oblong to make it the same area as the regular square.




Now look the irregular oblong has less area. So we’ve proved that for rectangles. The more sides kept internal, the smaller the area. Now we desimplify the length × width equation-


= ½ (a2 + b2) ×  ½ (a2

...read more.




Left one has less perimeter.

Because more sides are kept internal. Well this can be used on right angled triangles.









Getting the idea?

But the more r becomes different from s, the more those squares inside the triangle become disproportional. That’s why the best ratio for r and s would be 1 : 1.


This has more circumference                            than this. this is because you always cover more of a And less area                                                     route in less Steps by going from A to B





                                                (this can apply to everything which means I don’t

have to finish or prove anything more but I’ll do it the hard way)

This is because this


                       Leaves that triangle empty. And guaranteed that will be less than 2s because of

                         Pythagoras theoreum


(Now think about it if a square isn’t as much area when disproportioned sides- and a square is made up of triangles, what will it be when you have a triangle).

This then applies to equilateral triangles being better than all other triangles because a)


(which is why squares have more area than triangles,

...read more.


We know its regular as it stays constant from a point.


or in another way.


* a = side of square

   s = radius

   c = perimeter

   A = Area

               A    =   π× (s × s)

                      = 3.141… × s2

              A     =   a2  =   3.141… × s2

Same areas


               C    =   π× 2s

                      = 6.283185… × s

              C     =   (π× 2) ×s × 4   =   4 ( 2πs

               =  10.0265131 ×s

Now that difference in 4 is nothing compared to square root which shrink huge numbers down to tiny sizes. The smaller a number you square root, the less that is taken away (bear in mind that s > 0). But we are dealing with 1000, here, not 2, so the cut would be significant.

Therefore we can say that circles should be considered multi sided instead of 1 sided.

Also we can say the more sides a shape has the bigger its area for a given circumference, also sectors of a shape being of the same shape also makes the area bigger (sectors being the center of a shape joined to all corners- including circle).

What is this area then that we get with a circle?

R = 1000 / 2π

R = 159.1549431…

A = π× (159.1549431…)2

A = 79577.47155

Lets just back check against a square.

S = 1000 / 4

S = 250

A = 2502

A = 62500

Circle is biggest. No need for number crunching to prove anything, but if you want it there are spreadsheets Behind here is spreadsheets.

Username: alex                 Created on 28/03/2003 10:48 AM

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Fencing Problem section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Fencing Problem essays

  1. t shape t toal

    I will be using the letter T as before to represent the t-number and then express the rest of the numbers in the t-shape with the letter T. This should give me a formula as before which works for each of the t-shapes from each of the grids.

  2. t shape t toal

    T-2n-1 T-2n T-2n+1 T-n T N=Grid Width Here is the full formula to work when solving out the formula for the T-Shape on a certain grid size. T-Total=T+T-n+T-2n+T-2n-1+T-2n+1 T-Total=5T-7n Now lets try that formula on the 5 by 5 grid.

  1. t shape t toal

    Which gives us the formula of t = 5x - 63 Finding relationships on grids with sizes other than 9 x 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

  2. My investigation is about a farmer who has exactly 1000 metres of fencing and ...

    To divide the fencing equally for each side (as it is a square) I will divide the fencing by the number of sides (n) which is: 1000/n = 1000/4 = 250m To find the area of a square you use the same equation as you do for a rectangle: Area (A)

  1. Investigating different shapes to see which gives the biggest perimeter

    To work out the area of an isosceles triangle, I will use the following formula: Area = 1/2 Base x Height So before I can work out the area, I need to work out the height of the isosceles triangle.

  2. A length of guttering is made from a rectangular sheet of plastic, 20cm wide. ...

    9 1 6.313752 6.313751515 63.13752 20 11 1.818181818 8.181818 0.909091 6.322866 5.748060142 63.22866 20 12 1.666666667 7.5 0.833333 6.329795 5.274829245 63.29795 20 13 1.538461538 6.923077 0.769231 6.335185 4.8732195 63.35185 20 14 1.428571429 6.428571 0.714286 6.339461 4.528186467 63.39461 20 15 1.333333333 6 0.666667 6.34291 4.228606424 63.4291 20 16 1.25 5.625 0.625

  1. The best shape of guttering

    11 100 70.414 24 400 13 11 90 71.5 24 400 13 11 80 70.414 Net Width Net Length Side 1 Side 2 Angle Area 24 400 13 H7-J7 100 0.5*J7*K7*SIN(L7) H7 I7 J7 H8-J8 L7-10 0.5*J8*K8*SIN(L8) H8 I8 J8 H9-J9 L8-10 0.5*J9*K9*SIN(L9)

  2. The Fencing Problem. My aim is to determine which shape will give me ...

    made is true and that the observation I made is true, so far. My hypothesis was that as I increase the amount of sides the area would increase; I then expanded on this point and said that the difference between the areas was decreasing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work