• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 2603

# Investigate the difference of the product of the diagonally opposite corners of a certain shape, drawn on a 10x10 grid with the individual squares numbered off 1 to 100.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Maths Coursework Aim: I task is to investigate the difference of the product of the diagonally opposite corners of a certain shape, drawn on a 10x10 grid with the individual squares numbered off 1 to 100 I will start off by working this out on a 2x2 square and from there I will begin to investigate varying the length and width of rectangles and other squares. I will aim to investigate the differences for different sized rectangles and squares that are aligned differently on the grid. I will record findings and ideas as I proceed. Method: To make things easier for me I will break up each investigation in to sections, I will start with: 2x2 square I will concentrate on one particular aspect at a time. * What is the difference between the products of the corners? * Is the difference the same for a square or rectangle the same shape anywhere on the grid? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2 x 11 = 22 1 x 12 = 12 Diff = 10 Are all the differences 10? ...read more.

Middle

From my results I can draw a table: Length (L) Height (H) Area (A) Difference (D) 2 2 4 10 2 3 6 20 2 4 8 30 2 5 10 40 2 6 12 50 What do I notice? The area increases by 2 each time. This is because the length is always being multiplied by the height of 2. The difference increases by 10 each time. This is because the grid is 10x10 and makes it so if you choose any number, the next number vertical down from it is always 10 higher. Possible Formulas L-1 x 10 i.e. The length subtracted by one then multiplied by 10. But this formula must be tested with other rectangles with a length greater than 2 because it is highly probable it won't work due to height not being mentioned in the equation. L-1 x 5H i.e. The length subtracted by one then 5 multiplied by the height. Do these rules really work with other rectangles? I will now look at rectangles where the length is 3 squares across and see if the same patterns apply and investigate whether the rules I came up with are true for rectangles of any size. I believe I shall require only on example of each and will proceed on this principal. 3x4 rectangle 1 2 3 4 11 12 13 14 21 22 23 24 4 x 21 = 84 1 x 24 = 24 Diff = 60 3x5 rectangle 1 2 3 4 5 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 5 x 21 = 105 1 x 25 = 25 Diff = 80 Here the difference increases in multiples of 20. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is correct as from my previous working I know that on a 10x10 grid the difference is 60 (10x6) I can now build a table from my results: L H ?G 2 3 2 2 4 3 3 5 6 From this table I can see that between 2x3 and 2x4 that ? only increases by 1. This must be because the height has been increased also by 1. This tells me that the height must be connected to the difference. I will now work out how: * How can I get 2 from 2&3, and 3 from 2&4 using the same formula? If I subtract 1 from each of 2&3 I get L=1, H=2 1 x 2 = 2 The answers to both these short sums give me the figures to multiply G with to get the difference. I predict that this will work for 2&4: L = 2-1 = 1 H = 4-1 = 3 1 x 3 = 3 Wrote as an equation this method is L-1 x H-1 x G. Which is my previous rule of L-1 x G(H-1) just moved around, which proves that it is correct. Summarising: I have found the rule for any size rectangle or square on any sized grid which is: L-1 x G(H-1) Evaluation I believe I have completed my aims and succeeded in attaining the goals I had set. I have found the rule to work out the difference for a rectangle of any size on any grid. I have done this through progressive investigation and through the use of algebraic methods. I am happy with my outcome as I am convinced it is right. Nick Claydon Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Number Stairs, Grids and Sequences essays

1. ## Opposite Corners. In this coursework, to find a formula from a set of numbers ...

4 star(s)

224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273

2. ## I am going to investigate the difference between the products of the numbers in ...

4 star(s)

is the same wherever the square/rectangle is place. I will later try and prove this mathematically. 2x?n? Rectangles, 10x10 Grid Assuming that the difference is the same regardless of the rectangles position, I will only need to do one example for each rectangle: 2x3 23 24 25 33 34 35

1. ## I am going to investigate by taking a square shape of numbers from a ...

4 star(s)

I predict if I move the 5x5 square to the left I will get the same answer. 16 5x49=245 9x45=405 160 My prediction is right. I am going to use algebra to test my results. n n+4 n+40 n+44 (n+4)(n+40)=n�+160+44 n(n+44)=n�+44n Products difference is equal to (n�+160+44n)

2. ## In this coursework, I intend to investigate the differences of the products of the ...

3 star(s)

Likewise, a 2 x 6 rectangle will have a difference of 50. 2 x 6 But can I use this rule to estimate the difference of a 2 x 2 square? I predict that the trend will continue, as a square is just a special form of rectangle, and the difference shall be 10.

1. ## I am going to investigate taking a square of numbers from a grid, multiplying ...

3 star(s)

Again we can call the first corner 'x'. x - - - If this is the top line of a 4x4 square then we can just work out how much the top right corner will be more than x. x - - - So the top right corner is just x+3 x x+3 - - To find the

2. ## Number Grid Investigation.

= 1080. 9Z (n-1)(d-1) 90 (5-1)(4-1) = 1080. The formula is correct. I can now work out the product differences of grids of all multiples with any sized square within them. Multiples of: 4 5 6 7 8 5 X 4 square PD's: 1920 3000 4320 5880 7680 I will now try some of the above just to double check.

1. ## For other 3-step stairs, investigate the relationship between the stair total and the position ...

then complete the rest of the table by using this incremental number as shown below: From the table below and using our results from the investigation we can see a pattern emerging. Every time the size of the grid square increases, the value in the algebra formula increases by 35.

2. ## What the 'L' - L shape investigation.

My results shown in table format are as follows: Number in sequence 5L Difference Sum of L-Shape (L-Sum) 1 45 -9 36 2 50 -9 41 3 65 -9 56 4 70 -9 61 From the table of results I can see that the difference between 5L and the L-Sum is a constant -9.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to