• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 1173

# Koch&amp;#146;s Snowflake Investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Paton 10PA        Koch’s Snowflake Investigation

## Introduction

I am conducting an investigation into how Koch’s Snowflake is built up.  I will investigate how the perimeter and area change with each new shape.  On every new snowflake the middle third of every edge is taken out and a smaller triangle is put in its place ( see diagrams at back of project).  First, I will investigate how the perimeter increases with every shape.

### Perimeter

I will not count manually the length of each shape’s perimeter as this would be hard and inefficient.  Instead, I will calculate the perimeter by multiplying the number of edges on the shape by the length of each edge.

I have noticed that the number of edges on each shape is multiplied by 4 each time.  This is because every time a triangle is added, the side is split into 4 separate edges (see diagram above).  I have also noticed that the length of each edge is divided by 3 every time (see diagram).

Now, by multiplying the number of edges by the length of each edge on a shape, I can find its perimeter.

 Shape Number 1 2 3 4 No. Of Edges 3 ×4 12 ×4 48 ×4 192 Length of Each Edge 9 ÷3 3 ÷3 1 ÷3 ⅓ Perimeter 27 36 48 64

I have now noticed that the perimeter is increasing in a geometric sequence, by ⅓ of its value each time.  It is also increasing by a larger amount each time, and so is a divergent series.

## For example:          27 × 1⅓ = 36

36 × 1⅓ = 48

48 × 1⅓ = 64   and so on…

After considering this, I have discovered that this is connected to how I first calculated the perimeter.  It is evident on the table above that I multiplied the previous perimeter by 4, then divided by 3 to find the next perimeter.  So, the perimeter can be calculated by multiplying the previous one by .

27 ×  = 36

36 ×  = 48

48 ×  = 64

let n = shape number   let p = perimeter

 n 1 2 3 4 p 27 ×  = 36 ×  = 48 ×  = 64

Middle

27 ×  = 36, which is shape no. 2

27 ×  = 48, which is shape no. 3

27 ×  = 64, which is shape no. 4

the general rule for the perimeter is:

#### Area

I will now investigate how the area increases with each shape.  Instead of working out the area of each shape in cm³, I will count the number of triangles in each shape, as this is more efficient.

In the first snowflake (see back of project) there were 81 triangles.  The sides of the whole triangular shape are each 9 centimetres long, the area of one of the triangles can be found by squaring the length of one side ( 9 ² = 81).

I will calculate the area of each snowflake by breaking it down into individual triangle shapes.  For example, shape 2 consists of one large triangle, from shape 1, and three new, smaller triangles:

The area of shape 2 can therefore be calculated by:

area of large triangle + ( 3 × area of small triangle).

In order to work out the area in this manner, I will have to first work out the area of each triangle added on and the amount of triangles added on with each shape.

This table shows how the area of each small triangle decreases with each shape:

##### Shape Number

Area of Smallest Triangle

1

81

2

9

3

1

4

1/9

5

1/81

So, I now know that the area of the smallest triangle is divided by 9 with each new shape.

This table shows how the number of new triangles in each shape increases:

##### Shape Number

Number of Small Triangles

1

1

2

3

3

12

4

48

5

192

Conclusion

, as I worked out earlier.  I substituted these figures into the equation:

I then tested this equation:

 n Area using equation Real Area 1 27 81 2 39 108 3 44⅓ 120 4 46.7 125⅓ 5 47.8 127.7

This equation is not correct.  I will now try adding on 81 to my equation, as previously I had totally discarded it for being an exception to the pattern.  As 27 is really the second term and not the first, I will also change ‘n’ in my equation to ‘n-1’:

This equation works.  It can be used to find the area of any number of snowflake.

As the area series is convergent, I can also find the sum to infinity.

Using the Foundation A-Level book again, I have found the following equation:

I can now adapt this equation to suit my sequence:

This answer of 129.6 is consistent with my previous results as the area gets closer and closer to this figure, without ever reaching it.  This is evident on the graph I have drawn (see back of project).

129.6 is 1.6 times the original area of the first snowflake.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Fencing Problem section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Fencing Problem essays

1. ## The Koch Snowflake

came to be realized will be discussed, elucidated and observed in the 3rd answer. Q.2) Using a GDC or a suitable graphing software package, create graphs of four sets of values plotted against the value of 'n'. Provide separate printed output for each graph. ANS 2) . NO OF ITERATIONS(n)

2. ## The Koch Snowflake

(1/34)� = 0.6876 5. Values for n= 6 :- N6 = 3072 x 4 = 12288 L6 = 1/36 = 1/729 P6 = 12288 x 1/729 = 16.866 A6 = 3.4.4.4.4.4 .V3/4 . (1/36)� = 0.0025 + 0.6876 = 0.6901 A0 0.433 A1 0.577 A2 0.642 A3 0.670 A4 0.6876 A5 0.6876 A6 0.6901 A7 0.6912 A8 0.6917 A9 0.6919 A10 0.6920 6.

1. ## Koch Snowflake Math Portfolio

= 1 (1/3)0 = 1 n = 1 a r n = 1 (1/3)1 = 1/3 n = 2 a r n = 1 (1/3)2 = 1/9 Hence Proved.

2. ## The Koch Snowflake

2 3 x 4/3 x 4/3 x 4/3 = 3 x (4/3)� = 7 1/9 which is Stage no. 3 General Rule for Perimeter is: n = stage no. P = Perimeter of shape Pn = 3 x (4/3) n Area: Area of a triangle = 1/2 abSinC A0 =

1. ## Fencing investigation.

Therefore the area is always less than a similar rectangle. As I explained above, I can split the shape into a rectangle and two right-angled triangles and those two triangles have their hypotenuse as the two sides of the trapezium, and in a right-angled triangle, the hypotenuse is always the longest side.

2. ## Borders Investigation

Therefore the formula appears to work. As with perimeter, we can now look at the formula and obtain some visual understanding of why it works. We mentioned previously that the diameter of the shape could be represented by (2n for either side, 1 for the centre).

1. ## Perimeter Investigation

Square 250 62500 Pentagon 200 68800 Hexagon 166.7 72190 Heptagon 142.86 74201.4 Octagon 125 75450 Nonagon 111.1 76392.4 Decagon 100 76950 Icosagon 50 78900 Circle 0 79572.5 The triangle has the smallest area. The circle has the maximum area. I have plotted two graphs from these results obtained: My next

2. ## t shape t toal

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 If we start with the T-number of 39 this

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to