400 100 40 000
300 200 60 000
250 250 62 500
150 350 52 500
I will now further my investigation by looking at shapes of a different nature:
Regular Pentagon
The regular pentagon has 5 sides, and as we get 1000m of fencing, this means each side will be 200m (1000÷5=200).
I will now work out a triangle inside the pentagon and divide it by 6 later on. I have ‘halved’ the triangle in the pentagon and will be using Pythagoras, as it is a right angled triangle.
100 + 100 = 20 000
∴ √20000 = 141.4
And as there are 6 sides, I will multiply that number by 6,
141.4 × 6 = 848.52m
Before investigating shapes with even more sides, I will now look at shapes with fewer sides, just to confirm at the end that my theory is without fault.
The Triangle
In order to find out the area of the triangle, I need to multiply half base and height, half base = 400 ÷ 2 = 200,
∴ 200 x 170 = 34 000m
The Equilateral Triangle
I will work out the area by using half base multiplied by height, 333.3 ÷2 = 166.65,
∴166.65 x 270 = 44995.5
I will now try using a trapezium, however my investigation is going according to my prediction.
Trapezium _
I am using a trapezium because it is a four sided shape that I have not used yet.
I will split it up into 3 sections and find out the middle section and then do the calculations for the outer sections using half base times height:
200 x 200 = 40 000m 50 x 200 = 10 000m
50 x 200 = 10 000m
Total = 60 000m
I will now carry on by looking at shapes with more sides, I will now look at a 6 sided shape:
The Hexagon
I will work out the area in the same way that I went about finding out the area of the pentagon.
Using half base x height
- - 83.3333
=√20833.336677
= 144.34m
∴83.3333 x 144.2
=12028.13 x 6
=72 168.79
Looking at my results so far I can see that there is a growing trend, where the more sides, the bigger the area, I will now continue this using a shape with more sides.
The Octagon
I will wok this out in the same way that I discovered the area for the hexagon, but including trigonometry.
1000 ÷ 8 = 125m
125 ÷ 2 = 62.5 Tan 22.5 - 62.5
h
H = 62.5
Tan22.5
H = 150.9
150.9 x 62.5 = 9430.5 x 8 = 75, 444.20
I will investigate another shape:
The Dodecagon
I will work it out in the same way as I did with the octagon.
Half base = 41.65 Tan 75 = H
41.65
41.65 x Tan75 =H
= 155.4
∴41.65 x 155.4 = 6474.1 x 12 = 77 688.9
I can now put all the shapes in a table and I notice a pattern forming,
Equilateral Triangle (3) 44995.5
Triangle (3)
Square (4) 625, 00
Trapezium (4)
Pentagon (5) 68, 562.50
Hexagon (6) 72, 168.79
Octagon (8) 75, 444.20
Dodecagon (12) 77, 688.90
I will now use a shape with infinite sides because I can see a trend growing, although I am not sure that I will get any where just using more shapes, so I am going to use:
The Circle
Perimeter = 1000m
Diameter = 1000 ÷
=318.31 ÷ 2= 159.15
∴ r = 79, 577. 47
This proves my theory correct, as areas increased we grew more closer towards the circle. I have no real solid evidence to say why this is so, although I could suggest that because circles have no corners or straight edges, this increases the overall area of usable space.
This strong positive correlation on my graph shows the pattern which I have seen and predicted since the start, this proves that my results are correct and I do not think I should any anomalies as I worked out each shape using my own calculations.