• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: Maths
  • Document length: 3131 words

To test if preventing the rehearsal loop by an interference task reduces the number of words recalled from a list, hence a wider aim is testing the existence of short-term memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Psychology coursework Introduction Background The multi-store model of memory is concerned with the cognitive area of psychology. It suggests that memory is dived up into different stores, sensory, short term and long-term; it was identified by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968). The short-term memory is believed to be able to hold about seven "bits" or chunks of information for about 20 seconds without rehearsal. This information will move into the long-term memory if the information is repeated or rehearsed. In the diagram above it demonstrates how the rehearsal loop will send the information back around into the short term memory this will eventually go on into the long term memory. Glazner and Cunitz (1966) were interested and studied the primacy-recency effect. They also wondered if it made sense to consider the short and long term memory as two different stores. They then conducted experiments to see if they could independently manipulate the short and long-term memory. They conducted experiments of free recall with a list of words this lead them to the primacy and recency effect and the serial position curve (a U shaped graph) which shows how people tend to remember more words from the beginning and end of a list. The primacy effect is remembering the early words in the list; this is because they have had time for rehearsal, and the recency effect is remembering words from later in the list because they have remained in the short-term memory. They then altered their experiment and introduced an interference task designed to prevent the participant from rehearsing and therefore preventing words being stored in the short-term memory. There have been many developments on this research but a particularly profound discovery was by Murdock (1961) he found that the number of words a participant recalled could be increased by chunking the letters into groups of three he called these "trigrams". Rationale In the experiment the rationale was to replicate the study by Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) ...read more.

Middle

* For each group the same reader read 1 word per second for 30 seconds in order to ensure both group have an equal amount of time to remember words. * Both groups had 40 seconds for free recall to ensure both group have the same length of time to recall words. * Same list of words was read in same order in order to ensure experimental validity. * Conducted within 5 minutes of each other to prevent one group from having the disadvantage of being more tired or less alert. * Conducted under same weather conditions to ensure both groups' moods are not affected by the weather * Reader read the word list from the same position in the room to ensure the readers voice is projected around the room in the same way for both groups * Reader attempted to read the word list at the same volume and clearly to prevent the chance of misunderstanding a word that was read out. The reason that the above controls were used was to try and increase the accuracy of the results and to eliminate extraneous and confounding variables. Results Summary table Words recalled and position they occurred in the list that was read out Position of word in list Word Number of participants from group A that recalled this word Number of participants from group B that recalled this word Third in which the words occur 1 Light 11 8 1st third 2 Door 7 4 3 Tree 3 6 4 Frame 5 5 5 Watch 2 1 6 Blazer 2 1 7 Radio 1 0 8 Stone 2 1 9 Trolley 1 1 10 Pigtail 2 4 Total = 36 Total = 31 11 Paper 0 0 2nd third 12 Water 1 1 13 Loaf 2 1 14 Coach 1 3 15 Potato 5 3 16 Busstop 1 3 17 Trainer 6 1 18 Road 1 2 19 Curtain 3 3 20 Football 3 2 Total = 23 Total = 19 21 ...read more.

Conclusion

used were useful and prevented confounding and extraneous variables Improving Reliability However the methodology of selecting the matched pairs sample may mean that the results may not be the same if it was conducted again. The experiment is not very difficult to replicate but the major problems would lie in the reading of the words so ideally it would have been better to create a pre-recorded tape of the words being read out this would prevent errors arising here and would make replicating the study easier. Implications of study The results of the study (like Glazner and Cunitz (1966) found as evidence for short term and long term memory) reflected the hypothesis in that it implies that after being told some information and then given a task to interfere with the rehearsal loop than fewer words will be remembered from the end of the list. The reason fewer words were remember from the end of the list was because of the primacy recency effect which suggested that if an interference task is introduced then the recency effect would be destroyed. Generalisation of findings Because the study was conducted on a 6th form group of psychology students using an opportunity sample and the sample size was pretty small (22 people) this greatly prevents from generalising from the results of the experiment. Also the fact it was conducted in a very short time in a small area that again means generalisation would not be possible. Application of findings In real life this study has a lot of practical uses. A good place in which it could be relevant is in advertising. For example if a company is trying to advertise their product they will want their name to be remembered and therefore all the important information at the beginning and end of the advertisement to ensure that the vital information is remembered and in this way they will improve the effectiveness of advertisement. Appendix Word list Then the reader reads the following words to the participants. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Comparing length of words in newspapers section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Comparing length of words in newspapers essays

  1. Investigate, for different size pool tables, the number of contacts, (including the start, rebounds ...

    In these cases I can divide by the common factor after adding. E.g. In the case of the 3 x 6 table. 3 + 6 = 9 and 9/3 = 3. In the case of tables where the dimensions have no common factors I can assume that they have a common factor of 1.

  2. Assesment of Reading Difficulties in Patient AM Following the Development of Vascular Dementia.

    analysis tests but failing the position discrimination task with a score of 12/20 and the number location task on which he scored just 6/20. Poor performance on both the position discrimination and number location tasks suggested AM was experiencing problems in the area of attention and thus further tests were

  1. Recommendations On Improving My Own Interpersonal and Communicational Skills

    that the person I am communicating with, is able to understand me easily > I am very fluent in speaking English as well as speaking my own language which makes it easier for me to communicate as I have a smaller chance of not understanding certain instructions that I am

  2. memory. This experiment is a replication of the 1973 study conducted by Gordon ...

    After the test, a debriefing session was provided for the experiment, and the subjects were dismissed. The tests were then scored and results produced. Results: Control Group Mean (x1) 3.8 Median 3.5 Mode 0 Standard Deviation 3.2 In the control group, the mean number of correctly memorized words (x1)

  1. Investigation into the effect of homophone training on reaction times for a forced choice ...

    Underwood (1988) felt that as Rubenstein (1971) used homophones (words that only differed in one way in spelling or sound) in his experiment and Martin (1982) did not this could have effected the results. Underwood looked at the effects of having two training blocks doing the same experiment.

  2. Memory. The task, which the participants had to do was to look at a ...

    I then handed the participant a piece of paper and a pen and waited for them to finish writing down the words they recalled. When they had finished I said, "thank you for your time and I assure you that your results will remain strictly confidential."

  1. A dual-task study designed to permit inferences about cognitive processes

    The dependent variable was the time taken by the participant to tick all the colour words or number words (depending on which condition they were given) on the list. This was measured in seconds by the researcher using a stopwatch and was accurate to the nearest second.

  2. Marrying Absurd Commentary

    (M.A, p 80) Didion leaves the reader with Mr. Brennan ironically contradicting himself and stirring up feelings of fury and disgust in the reader. By the end of the essay, she introduces a young bride having her wedding party at a strip restaurant with her family.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work