• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these sources support the view that the New Deals of the 1930's were radical changes in the Federal Government's social and economic policy?

Extracts from this document...


How far do these sources support the view that the New Deals of the 1930's were radical changes in the Federal Government's social and economic policy? All of the sources in some way imply or explicitly state that the New Deals introduced radical policies in society and the economy. However, some sources in particular show that the government abandoned Hoover's policy of 'laissez-faire' to increase its involvement in welfare and businesses. Sources A and D do this particularly, although all sources can be seen as having various interpretations according to different perspectives. Both the TVA and the CCC, mentioned in Source A, may have been the most radical policies of the First New Deal, making sweeping changes in the system to ease unemployment and stimulate the economy. The TVA meant central planning of programmes like hydroelectricity production and modernising farming techniques, completely contrasting Hoover's way of government whose belief in 'rugged individualism' meant that direct federal aid was unheard of. Roosevelt almost condemns the previous government through the statement "long years of wasteful inaction" to describe putting government properties to use. ...read more.


Whether employers actually followed the act also remains unspecified, so C does not strongly support the argument. Both sources E and B mention the NIRA, the former showing the reactions of businessmen and conservatives to the radical "labour and tax returns". It, like B, refers to codes controlling work practices and regulations to improve economic and social situations. The proposal of an unbalanced budget was met with fear of its extremity, and so great were the changes that it was compared to "State socialism". For the first time, trade unions were officially recognised, as stated in B, and generally showing increased government control of industry. Also, Source B states that the government exercised more power, as does F. The NIRA enabled the President to approve of employment codes and conditions, and F states that the First New Deal "put more power in the hands of the central government", particularly in the economy. As when "left to itself, farming was in a state of anarchy", it is suggested that policies interfering with the agricultural system were introduced - for example, the FCA, FSA, TVA and AAA. ...read more.


This may have given reason for embellishment, as with D - which, like A, are from a member of the programme. In both cases, the lack of accurate statistical information suggests uncertainty among other things, and extravagant claims like "never equalled in the history of this nation" with little evidence to back them up causes questioning of factual content. While extracts from actual acts can be held as completely accurate, there may be emotional factors involved in F, as we can see that the speaker only took part in the First New Deal and he may have been biased against the later acts, whether he was expelled or resigned as Brain Trust Head. Source G was drawn from a highly conservative viewpoint and contains high levels of bias, but is useful in informing us about conservative reactions to Roosevelt's policies. Most of the sources can be seen as supporting the view that many radical changes were indeed made during this period, and while they do not mention every change in all social or economic areas, they do tend to show great contrast to Hoover's policies and therefore support the argument. [898 words] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Account for the rise of militarism in Japan during the 1930s.

    of democracy and allegiance?? to its principles". Party politicians were corrupt, and too closely with the Zaibatsu??, for example, Seiyukai??? with Mitsui?? while Minseito??? with Mitsubishi??. Scandals?? happened usually. Frequent changes of the cabinet led to government inefficiency. Parties relied mainly on big landlords and big enterprises for financial support, but turned a deaf ear???

  2. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    There was opposition both within and without South Africa to the apartheid policy. Key figures in the church spoke out against injustice using Christian teachings to support their argument. Trevor Huddleston, an Anglican missionary, wrote "Afrikaner theology and English apathy have together created a situation in which men, made in

  1. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    obtain was that local authorities had the right to provide school meals, it did not directly secure it. Even by 1939 less than 50% of school children were actually being provided this service. Instead of opposing to the private members bill in parliament the liberals met half way.

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    In addition, again like the Conservatives, the New Labour government 'ruled out' joining the single currency before the end of the first term. However, all these arguments for Blair being a Tory and the New Labour shifting towards Conservatives can be argued.

  1. personal exercis programme

    These four are principles of training. The principles of training are rules that should be followed when using any exercise programmes as they make the PEP adapted to meet the personal needs of the individual as well as ensure that each activity s carried out safely.

  2. J. S. Mill Despre Libertate

    Autorul este de acord ca un individ cu un intelect deschis dar care nu a lasat loc �n mintea sa pentru habotnicie si pentru unul din principiile calvine - care �n opinia lui Mill nu este gresit intru totul - ce doreste reprimarea si supunerea laturii egoiste ce sta �n

  1. Did Democracy Survive in Britain in the 1930's as a Result of the Policies ...

    The means test was a method of administering unemployment benefit by determining a family's income and assets wealth and depending on the size of the family, to see how much money they would receive if any. This method of testing was seen as undemocratic, as it denied people the chance

  2. Fascism and Communism in Britain in the 1930's

    Source E is by a respectable member of the community so you would of thought a reliable source To what extent can the failure of the fascist movement to challenge the existing political system be attributed to poor strategy and leadership?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work