• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Biological weapons

Extracts from this document...


We have all heard about biological weapons but I have never been really sure about what it exactly is, when and how it is used... So in this essay I am going to mix the science and the impact on society to find the answers to all my doubts. Biological weapons may be defined as "micro organisms that infect and grow in the target host producing a clinical disease that kills or incapacitates the targeted host". These microbes can be natural or made by genetic engineering. Biological warfare means the use of harmful bacteria as a weapon in a war. We also use the term biochemical weapons: it is a mixture of the two words biological and chemical. I have read in the article of Leonard A. Cole that biological weapons should be considered as more dangerous because chemical weapons are inanimate, but all the pathogens used in biological weapons are reproductive and contagious. So biological weapons are the only weapons that can become more and more dangerous with time because of their multiplication. ...read more.


To that, the countries that are against biological weapons answer that it is unrealistic to say large populations will wear those types of clothes for a long period of time, above all when the weather is warm, and this is a big problem because large populations cannot be protected against a biological attack; indeed we cannot know when it is going to happen so we can't be adequately prepared against it, and even if we identify the pathogen, we still need to be able to cure it; more than that, it is very expensive to build a national civil defence system against biological and chemical weapons, it has been estimated to $ 80 billion. When scientists do research about the pathogens, it can be very positive in one way because it can lead to the developments of cures or vaccines. But on the other side, there is the negative aspect, because all the new information can also be used to produce more and more efficient biological agents and weapons. ...read more.


But prevention stays the most effective safeguard against biological warfare and terrorism. I think that it is primordial to be able to control the commands of pathogens, because I read in the article "The Specter of Biological Weapons" that "no more than a credit card and a false letterhead" to get the pathogen, in that case the plague bacteria. Personally, I think that biological weapons are very bad and wrong because I simply do not see the point of it. I really do not understand why people would want to kill entire innocent populations. Of course I think that research on pathogens needs to be done to improve medical cares and find more vaccines, to eradicate more diseases, but the fact that some people use this medical research to create biological weapons is horrible. The problem of biological weapons has always been present but it is now becoming more and more important because of the progress of biotechnology, and because it has been proved that terrorists were not afraid to use this kind of weapons anymore. So I think that the international agreements against biological warfare have a very important role to play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    * Providing key workers with the skills to recognise and respond appropriately to families at high risk of violence. Tertiary Prevention There are a range of interventions offered within Aotearoa New Zealand to assist families who have experienced family violence.

  2. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    But Mandela could also have been "an abused leader of his people" this is because the government could have discriminated him and put him in prison for no reason. Source A backs this up when it says "the communists were the only people who would eat with us, talk with us, live with us and work with us".

  1. Biochemical weapons

    Thus why do we need weapons at all? If noone had weapons how could there be war? Would not all people have to talk about the problems their country has? They would have to do demonstrations and strikes, or find other ways to change their country's economic and political state.

  2. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    For the next two decades these tactics would hold sufficient until Christmas 1991 when the unthinkable occurred, the Soviet Union Collapsed. Thousands of weapons of mass destruction stock pilled from the Cold War as well as the knowledge and expertise behind them would now potentially be left on the open market.

  1. Archaeological Instruments - 11th Century.

    Peasants only tended to fight close to their home areas when danger threatened them directly. They tended to have simple weapons, often adapted from farm tools. The round shield was being replaced by the new kite shaped design during the 11th Century.

  2. Christians in developed countries.

    the people in the developing world and the problems it is facing, such as hunger, poverty and diseases.

  1. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    It must be a last result and peaceful methods have been tried beforehand. 2) There must be a legitimate ruling authority in charge of the war. It cannot be just if there are several individuals or groups who do not have the support of the state.

  2. The Potential of Biological Weapons-Agents of Mass Destruction or Simply of Fear?

    Botulinum toxin annihilates by slow asphyxiation, as the cells of the victim's breathing muscles die from within.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work