• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment

Extracts from this document...


Darren Parker Capital Punishment DEATH- The word alone sums up a great deal of horrific pain and torture, despite this some states or countries still use it today as a form of punishment for the criminal "lowlife" that "pollutes" the world. In this piece of writing, I am going to discuss Capital Punishment and the many reasons for why it should be completely abolished. My first reason for being against the death penalty is that many innocent people have been wrongfully accused and executed as a result of the death penalty. In 1973 Judith Ward was convicted for the murder of 12 soldiers in a coach explosion on the M62. She served 18 years in prison for a crime that she did not commit before finally being proved innocent in 1992. This innocent person's life was saved as a result of the abolition of the death penalty in Britain. On the contrary, not every wrongfully accused convict has been as lucky as Judith. ...read more.


In 1983 it took three charges of electricity over a period of fourteen minutes for a prisoner to be declared dead. Similarly in 1993 a prisoner being executed with lethal gas convulsed for 8 minutes. Pointed out, doctors have, that lethal injections may not always work effectively and it can be an extremely painful and brutal process. These examples of torture effectively show that Capital Punishment is cruel, inhumane and has no place in our world. Darren Parker Capital Punishment Continued Some people might argue for the death penalty and say it acts as an effective deterrent in which criminals shall fear their possible punishment and decide not to commit a crime. This Statement is completely and utterly false as there is no evidence whatsoever to support the view that the death penalty works as a unique deterrent. The arguments outlined by Professor Terence Morris and Louis Blom-Cooper QC suggest that: in so far as any penalty is relevant to the murder rate, the death penalty provides no greater control over the incidence of murder than does the mandatory penalty of life imprisonment. ...read more.


Moreover, we as human beings should have the power to show mercy to others as mercy is a great quality, it can not be forced...it arises naturally. Mercy is especially great when it comes from those in power. Even William Shakespeare knew this, in a time when public execution was common. In his play "The Merchant of Venice" the character Antonio is given the opportunity to kill the man who tried to kill him (Shylock) but instead he chooses not to which highlights that mercy is "The mightiest of the mightiest" It is problematical to see how anyone could approve of Capital Punishment. Without any question or doubt it is significantly cruel, inhumane, painful and violates human rights. Likewise the death penalty has consumed the lives of many innocents, it reduces us to murderers and does not act as a deterrent. So why do ninety seven countries still use and retain the death penalty? Perhaps we are not this civilised world that we think we are, in the eyes of our laws and rights we are just "murderers." To rid this world of brutal killings should we not start off with ourselves? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Is an eye for an eye a legal remedy in the 21st century?

    World wide 112 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice.xxvii The United States of America has not yet taken the next step to abolishing capital punishment however they have taken steps to reduce who they execute and to what crimes warrant the punishment, mainly only first-degree murder.

  2. Capital Punishment, is it an effective or ineffective deterrent?

    What counts as "a cruel and unusual" punishment? Although there are obviously degrees of cruelty, is the death penalty inherently cruel? The two most common methods of executions in the modern world are shooting and hanging these are followed by beheading and lethal injection. It can be argued that when carried out correctly (in the British measured drop manner)

  1. Capital punishment as a deterrent of capital crimes in America

    effectively safeguarded against escape (maximum security confinement), the right of the state to take his life as punishment, retribution, revenge, or retaliation for previously committed offenses (no matter how numerous or heinous).... does not exist in moral law" (McNamara 184).

  2. Should Capital Punishment be completely abolished?

    There are several methods of Capital Punishment. These include hanging, electrocution, and the gas chamber, which all have potential problems. The most common method currently, is lethal injection. This is a very slow process. Usually the prisoner will lose consciousness in about a minute, but this is not always the case.


    This is when a couple of trained men shoot the convict right in their live, pumping heart. The gas chamber is also a vicious form of the death penalty. This is when a poisonous and dangerous gas, Hydrogen Cyanide is released into a locked room, where the convict(s) is/are located.

  2. Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane.

    The Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) ensures that offenders are given the opportunity to rehabilitate, thus preventing criminals from re-offending. (Woodgate,2003, p.202) People can change over time and according to the Australian Institute of Criminology, many murderers, sometimes through the ageing process do change their attitudes towards crime.

  1. My view on Euthanasia.

    While it is true that life is a valuable thing to possess, it might only be valuable in certain circumstances. If a person is suffering from chronic pain, then is the person's life really valuable if even the person himself does not hold any value in it?

  2. Capital punishment and human rights.

    It is moral and it is a way of expressing common beliefs in what's right and wrong. Some believe that the instinct for retribution is part of the human nature. Some supporters may believe that channelling that human instinct would have a favourable effect, in promoting the stability of a society governed by law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work