• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically assess Hume's dismissal of miracles.

Extracts from this document...


Critically assess Hume's dismissal of miracles. In his dismissal of miracles David Hume argued not that miracles were impossible, but that it would be impossible to legitimately prove that one had actually happened. He said, for example, that if one was to say that through miracle a person returned to life after death then this would go against the laws of nature, which have been repeatedly supported over hundreds of years: No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle unless the testimony be of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavours to establish. (David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 1748) Or in other words you cannot prove something to be completely reliable unless the alternative to what you are trying to prove is even more implausible. Therefore, if one uses Hume's theory it can be said that one is more likely to be hallucinating than to be experiencing a miracle, which is a direct violation of natural law. ...read more.


(David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 1748) Hume's first point then is that those who have previously made claims concerning miracles have not been credible, as they were not of a high enough intelligence and reputation in Hume's eyes. Hume's second and third reasons support his first; the second point states that those who are testifying for a miracle will have 'a natural tendency to suspend their reason and support their claim'1: ...a religionist may be an enthusiast and imagine he sees what has no reality: he may know his narratives to be false, and yet persevere in it...for the sake of promoting a holy cause. (David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 1748) So in other words those who are testifying for a miracle are so enthusiastic about the existence of the said miracle that they have forgotten all common sense and are deluding themselves about the existence of miracles. The third reason is that he believed most miracles were said to have been observed among 'ignorant and barbarous nations' and therefore should be discounted, as these people are also not reliable sources. ...read more.


Hume said that: In destroying a rival system, it [a miracle] likewise destroys the credit of these miracles, on which that system was established. (David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 1748) This fourth point can easily be questioned as the premise that all miracles are a mutually exclusive invention of their own religion is not a fact. It is true that miracles cannot be used to support a whole tradition as then all miracles would cancel each other out, but this does not mean that miracles cannot occur objectively. Therefore, when regarding Hume's argument as a whole, it is clear to see that to make the argument more solid Hume needs to go into further detail about his four points. However, there are some points, for example the assertion which states that for a miracle to be true, a certain type of person needs to testify for it, which do not hold up when subjected to scrutiny and therefore on a whole I do not find Hume's dismissal a convincing argument. 1 Philosophy of Religion for A level for OCR, PG 176 Vicki Rounding 11th January 2005 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miracles section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miracles essays

  1. Miracles. Many people have different views on what a miracle really is. For ...

    vocation was not to be a Religious, but a spouse and a mother; that she would sanctify herself, and would travel the world. That same day, the Sacred Heart of Jesus told her to go to Rome. Maria Esperanza is considered one of the greatest mystics of these times.

  2. David Hume and Miracles.

    This raises a disturbing problem for the empiricist namely that if the laws of nature are by definition invariable the phrase 'laws of nature' becomes an unproductive part of the empiricist's vocabulary - it is reduced to a resolutely mute peculiarity of the English language.

  1. Talking about miracles

    Examples are the story of the paralysed man where he was able to work after Jesus told him he was forgiven and could walk. In the healing miracles Jesus made the blind people see the lame walk and others with skin diseases to be healed.

  2. The girl in the story was labeled as a girl, which is interesting to ...

    Jing-mei wanted to be her own person. She didn't want to be what her mother wanted her to be. Toward the end of this short story Jing-mei's mother enrolls her in a recital to showcase her talent. Jing-mei was to play the song "Pleading Child". She played the song horribly at the recital.

  1. Discuss the differences and similarities between the two stories concentrating on how they begin ...

    The ending of 'A Sound of Thunder' is very dramatic, and is left as a cliff hanger. The characters' worst fears, of changing time have come true and now their own 'present' is different to the way they left it before the safari.

  2. Explain the term 'miracle'

    This is because Luke records so many miracles that Jesus performs. Even Jesus' birth was miraculous to him. Through the miracles in Luke, Luke shows that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and the fulfilment of the Old Testament prophecies.

  1. What is a miracle?

    Jesus does not work on his own. He consults his father and is given the power and inspiration by the Holy Spirit. The miracles demonstrate the power of the kingdom of God, but on their own Jesus would be nothing more than a miracle worker.

  2. My Personal Theory on an Afterlife

    So what is the difference between humans and animals? As far as I can tell it's just a question of intelligence, as measured by us. After all, it's not that long ago that we were animals; our species of life (or simply, ?we?)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work