• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Death Penalty - Should it be abolished?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Death Penalty- Should it be abolished? In this essay, I will try to answer the above question. I am going to express my view on why I think the death penalty shouldn't be abolished. I will also express my views on why capital punishment should be re-introduced in the United Kingdom. Capital punishment is the execution of convicted criminals committing offences regarded so heinous. There are five different ways of execution; lethal injection, electrocution, lethal gas, hanging and firing squad. The most commonly used methods today are lethal injection and the electric chair. If a person is lethally injected, he is first out to sleep with thiopental sodium and then he is administered with potassium chloride, which will stop his heart. The criminal dies from respiratory and cardiac arrest while he/she is unconscious. As for the electric chair, there is an initial jolt of 2,300 volts, which lasts for 8 seconds, followed b a low-voltage jolt of 1,000 volts, which lasts for 22 seconds and finally a jolt of 2,300 volts for 8 seconds. ...read more.

Middle

If we compare the crime rate of any one of these countries to a western country, there is a mass difference. It proves the effect of the death penalty on the how it deters crime. Criminals in these countries are afraid of committing petty crimes. It is because the death penalty has induced the fear of death into the 'would be' killers. Therefore, I strongly feel that the death penalty truly deters crime. We all know that it is better to kill a murderer to save innocent lives than to allow the deaths of innocent people to save the life of a murderer. It is a fair trade to execute murderers to save innocent lives. If we save the innocent from the criminals, hen capital punishment is justified. Many people will attack the concept of the death penalty. They will give emotional speeches about the convicted man/woman who might be executed. But they are forgetting one crucial element while doing so. ...read more.

Conclusion

Robert Matthews, a journalist once wrote, " Some people argue that the absence of the death penalty in England is the mark of a civilized society". I disagree with this statement. Some of the things that happen on our streets and in people's homes certainly do not constitute civilized behaviour. These criminals do not care about the lives of those they have destroyed. They commit offences even on Christmas Eve. Surely that is uncivilized behaviour. Why would anyone destroy Christmas for another person, even when he himself celebrates it? The answer simply is that his behaviour is uncivilized. People like him are the ones that make this country uncivilized. I believe that the re-introduction of the death penalty would be the only possible solution to bring these uncivilized people to justice. It can never bring back the loved ones to the families that have lost them. It can never bring the innocent lives that have been taken in cold blood. But yes the death penalty can bring the uncivilized to justice. The death penalty will eventually bring peace and safety to our society. Jameel Qureshi 10 R - 1 - 01/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    The Eighth Amendment clearly states that any "cruel and unusual punishments" are forbidden. The debate then lay on whether the death penalty is in fact a "cruel and unusual punishment". Pro-Death Penalty views claimed that the death penalty is not a cruel and unusual punishment in the eyes of those who wrote the Amendments due to the Fifth Amendment.

  2. Death Penalty

    In Islam, the victim and the victim's family are the judges for all crimes; they decide what the punishment shall be under the supervision of a person who knows the Quran. We think that we are the more civilised religion, because they think that we at the west have a

  1. Should the death penalty be used lawfully in civilised society

    the chance to be remembered for something other than cold blooded murder. The strongest argument against capital punishment is the argument that the death penalty is wrong morally, as it is the cruel and inhumane taking of a human life.

  2. Is the death penalty the best protection from a murderer? Is justice for the ...

    Such racial bias has existed over the history of the death penalty and appeared to be largely intractable. In some cases, the defendants cannot afford their own attorney or get a lousy lawyer who lack experience and falls asleep during the client's trial.

  1. Let's Give murderers What they Deserve - the Death penalty.Explain the arguments for and ...

    By committing a crime, the criminal automatically volunteered to assume the risk of receiving a punishment that he could have avoided by not committing the crime. Therefore, the punishment he receives is one that he voluntarily risked suffering, so therefore it is no more unjust to him than any other event for which you knowingly volunteer to assume the risk.

  2. Death penalty.

    whatever the reason may have been, it took 18 whole minutes for the man to die. In the mean time he could feel the pain of the injection going in his blood, thinking every good thing he had done in is life didn't count anymore, all that counted was that he was needed nor wanted in the society anymore.

  1. Discuss the Arguments For and Against the Reintroduction of the Death Penalty For Murder

    Hood, 1989: 119). The death penalty implies that the threat of capital sanction, or to be more precise the risk of death, prevents those who are about to commit a capital offence from doing so, in more cases than would the threat of life imprisonment.

  2. Religion and Criminal Justice - "Let's keep society safe and give murderers what they ...

    But then there is the question of the murderer's right to protection and if every man is your neighbour then the murderer is as-well and therefore you cannot hurt him because you would not want to be hurt. This could form a complex argument but basically where Christian beliefs are

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work