• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

God and The Universe

Free essay example:

God and the Universe

Can one still believe in God and the modern cosmological findings?

        The Big Band was such a cataclysmic event that it is natural to suppose it marked the beginning of the universe. So how do we account for it?

        Judeo-Christians response has always been God. But there are those who argue that God is not necessary. Instead they attribute the Big Bang to quantum fluctuation. Whether quantum physics had anything to do with the universe we do not know. If it did, it would not solve the problem as to where the physical law governing process came from. Would it not have taken a God to chose the laws? Why are there any laws at all?

        Behind this richness lies order. If it takes intelligence to recognise this, would it not have taken intelligence to have devised it in the first place?

        In any case when speaking of God as the creator, we need to be careful. We do not see God as the cause of the Big Bang, there probably was no cause. This arises because any such cause would have had to exist before the effect. But we believe that the instant of the Big Bang marked not only the coming into existence of the contents of the universe but also the coming into existence of time and space. There was no time before the Big Bang and hence no time to accommodate a cause of the Big Bang.

‘What place then for a creator?’

        However, this remark is not as damaging to religious belief as one might first suppose. To see why, we need to draw a distinction between the words ‘origins’ and ‘creation’. ‘How did the world get started?’ is a question of origin. ‘Why are we here?’ ‘What is keeping us in existence?’ is concerned with the underlying ground of all being.

        It is for this reason that whenever theologians talk about God they couple it with the idea of God the sustainer. He is involved at first hand in everything that goes on.

        Now let us consider what type of universe it is, take for example its size. Are we expected to believe that God designed all of it as a home for humans? On an astronomical scale we have virtually no effect on anything, it is us who go around the sun. We are not important, although most of us would like to think of ourselves as important, does that mean we would like to swap places with the sun? Empathically no.

The sun does not know it is important, this is when we introduce the notion of consciousness.

‘Man is the feeblest reed in existence, but he is a thinking reed… though the universe were to destroy him, man would be more noble than his destroyer, for he would know that he was dying, while the universe, would know nothing of its own achievement.’

(Blaise Pascal)

Our brain is the most complex structure to be found in the universe. What is more relevant than size is the degree of complexity. Is it perhaps not so absurd to think that God would take a particular interest in us? But does he? Are we really to regard the universe as out natural home?

        The depths of space are incredibly cold, that human life is a transitory phenomenon in the cosmos. Yet there is something very peculiar about the universe, about the hostility of the universe to life, which has lead to the Anthropic Principle.

        The Anthropic Principle are the laws that make up nature, if we were to imagine we had the responsibility of making up the universe we would have to get all the laws correct. For example, how violent to make your Big Bang? Everything has to be just right, in order for life to evolve. Somehow our universe manages to satisfy every single condition. The chance of this happening would be virtually zero, yet the universe far from seemingly being hostile to life, has seemingly bent over backwards to accommodate life. To this there are three explanations:

  • Firstly, to pins one faith on science, things simply have to be the way they are, there is no need to invoke coincidences.
  • The second way of addressing the Anthropic Principle is to assert that our universe is not alone. There are perhaps a great numbers of universes that all run on different laws, or that perhaps in only one did the conditions happen to be right for life. With so many attempts it is no longer surprising that it should have happened.
  • Scientists tend to go for the simplest most economical explanations, therefore the infinite universes does not really count as science. The third alternative is there is a designer, God. One can either prove nor disprove God on the basis of reasoning. If one is inclined to reject the idea of a God than one can do so when science shows how the coincidences are not really coincidences.

           Stephanie Subramaniam

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Religious Studies (Philosophy & Ethics) Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Death and Dying

    straight to heaven, those who have sinned will go to purgatory to confess and be cleansed and those who have refused to believe in god will go to hell. Then everyone will be judged when Jesus arrives, and God will make a new heaven and earth, and the souls in hell will remain there.

  2. Man and the Universe

    [Genesis 1:14-16]). * Fifth Day: Air and Sea Creatures are created. They are commanded to reproduce ("'Let the water be filled with many kinds of living beings, and let the air be filled with birds.' He blessed them all and told the creatures that in the water to reproduce...and he told the birds to increase in number."

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    Whilst this debate was merely an example of how Darwinian theory was initially received; the Presbyterian Church in the USA is a poignant, and current reminder that many still argue against the validity of the theory of evolution. Even though there has been a huge conflict between the theory of

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    than one percent only if these regions are taken to be three billion light years or more in diameter.) This might suggest that the prediction of a big bang singularity is inapplicable to the universe since this prediction is based on the assumptions of perfect homogeneity and isotropy.

  1. How far have the theories of the modern sciencetists about the origin of the ...

    However it does decline any claim put forward that God's existence can be verified through cosmology. As this theory denies that the universe has a beginning so therefore does not require a God or a higher power to 'begin' the universe.

  2. Birth Of The Universe

    It happened and is always happening. It always will. Out of this "was, is, and will be" a synergy emerges. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. God/Goddess/All That Is is that whole. Feminine energy never wants to be singular or supreme. That's something that masculine energy, in its dominating principle, cannot grok. ... {laughter} ...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work