• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Capital Punishment Affirms Life

Extracts from this document...


Gary Hammontree ENG 104 M. Williams Argument Analysis 11/15/2004 Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life Mr. Koch's essay in defense of capital punishment starts with the statements made by two death row inmates at the time of their executions. Both men made statements that killing is wrong and that in turn, the state is wrong in putting them to death. These men were convicted of murdering and or raping at least six people. Mr. Koch expresses that life is indeed precious and that if the death penalty were a perceived possibility in the minds of these men it might have acted as a deterrent. That sentiment may or not be true. In our past, there were more capital offenses on the books. Rape was at one time a capital offense. Rape a woman and die. Oddly, there was a significantly lower incidence of rape forty or fifty years ago. The random snatching, assault, rape, and or murder of a woman were an isolated event, something that we did not hear of on a daily basis. ...read more.


2. No other democracy uses the death penalty. Simply put Mayor Koch points out that no other democracy has anywhere near the incidence of violent crime and murder rates that the United States possesses. There are more murders in Los Angeles in one year that some countries experience in a single year. If other countries had the equal rate of murders, the outcry for capital punishment would be as loud as or louder than it is here. 3. An innocent person might be executed by mistake. Mayor Koch's position here is that although there is the remote possibility that such an event could occur, the likelihood is infinitely small and that we should not toss aside this form of punishment and deterrent, such as it is, because the penalty and deterrent is the only defense that we have to stem the epidemic violence. 4. Capital punishment cheapens the value of human life. Mayor Koch's answer to this argument is simply that the severity of the punishment in fact affirms the value of life in that such a severe penalty is extracted. ...read more.


As Mayor Koch says in conclusion, the death of anyone - even a convicted killer diminishes us all. However, even worse would be a nation that allows the crime of murder to go unpunished. There are consequences for everything we do in life. There should certainly be consequences for the criminal taking of a life and they should be severe, otherwise there is no consequence and certainly no deterrent. Mayor Koch uses a fallacious argument in defending capital punishment as necessary after condemning killing in general. He attempts to make the case that killing as punishment is valid while killing because of a crime, or in a fit or anger, or even as a pastime, is wrong. There is an argument to be made for capital punishment, but we should, at the same time be prepared to admit that killing is in the final analysis wrong. As a punishment, the death penalty may be needed in today's world, but we should still accept that it is at best unavoidable and is still wrong in and of itself. 1 Hammontree ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Capital Punishment: An injustice or a necessity?

    At the same time, the death penalty, suggests that society too lacks morality if it can put a person to death. Capital punishment makes society appear violent too. It has a brutalizing effect because it sends out a message that it is acceptable to kill in some circumstances and may

  2. Capital punishment as a deterrent of capital crimes in America

    These numbers also indicate that the majority of Americans also do not accept the premise of vengeance or retribution as grounds for execution of criminals. Finally, this illustrates that a majority of Americans are in support of review of and reform within the institutions of the death penalty in America.

  1. Capital Punishment

    Therefore when applying this to capital punishment, each individual and his situation can be taken into account and whether they deserve to be executed. Relating this to the Green Mile, every prisoner shown in that film deserved to be executed apart from Coffee because he was truly innocent.

  2. Capital punishment is no longer practised in our society. Explain what differing Christian attitudes ...

    He was the ultimate sacrifice, which means after him, no more sacrifices should be given or taken. Therefore no one should be killed on trial like Jesus was, because he was the ultimate sacrifice. A martyr is someone who would die for their beliefs, so this could turn criminals into

  1. Examine at least 2 reasons for believing in life after death

    John 3:16 states: "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." Majority of Christians therefore base their belief in afterlife, simply because God/Jesus said so.

  2. Capital Punishment - Justice or Murder? - Joe should never be set free, ...

    bones in their body without killing them, but leaving them in excruciating pain. Their limbs were then woven through the spokes of the wheel and their body was hoisted up by their back and left to bake in the sun or to freeze in the snow.

  1. Capital Punishment, is it an effective or ineffective deterrent?

    history of torture, and Alessandro was an official at a Milan prison had first hand experience of the prison's appalling conditions. In On Crimes and Punishments Beccaria presents one of the first sustained critiques of the use of capital punishment.

  2. Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane.

    few offences including piracy and treason but however eventually these anomalies were swept away with the passing of the Crimes Amendment Act, 1985. Now the sentence of life imprisonment has become the most severe sanction authorized in any state by Australian law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work