• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far have the theories of the modern sciencetists about the origin of the universe strengthened the case for the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


How far have the theories of the modern scientists about the origins of the universe strengthened the case for the existence of God? The cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it. The existence of the universe, the argument claims, stands in need of explanation, and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by God. The cosomological argument states; Everything that exists has a cause of its existence, the universe exists so therefore it has a cause, if the universe has a cause of its existence, then that cause is God. This then concludes that God exists. The vast advancements of Science through scientific theories about the origins of the universe could be said to have strengthened the Cosmological argument for the existence of God, however this could also be challenged and could be used to weaken the argument for the existence of God. One of the theories put forward, was the Steady State theory. This theory denies that the universe has a beginning. ...read more.


People can understand this theory from two points. Some would go on to say that it was a deliberate action by God and therefore the Big Bang is divine, thus strengthening the argument for the existence of God. However some would take another route such as athiests and go on to say that it was not divine and does not verify the existence of God, as it all occurred by chance. Thus, weakening the argument for the existence of God. Polkinghorne went along the lines of believing that the Big Bang was created by God and was not a random event as even a minute change could may even result in an explosion. He went on to say that, 'we should look to God's existence as an aid for understanding why things have developed in the physical world by the manner that they have.' Polkinghorne claimed that religion and science were intellectual cousins, religion asks why? And science asks hows? Therefore both religion and Science are working to discover the origins of the universe, but from two difference perspectives. The so-called Kalam argument highlights the sequence of cases that resulted in our world cannot be infinite, since infinity in face cannot be known or concieved. ...read more.


This could be example could then be used for the existence of God, even though we cannot prove that he does exist, we can understand the existence of God and thus conclude that he created the universe. In conclusion, I feel that Science does strengthen the case for the existence of God in some respect through cosmology. Although, the Cosmological argument does need more than Scientific theories in order for it to be successful. The design argument as Davis suggests could be some evidence along with the Cosmological argument to prove the existence of God. Stephen Hawking went onto say 'an expanding universe does not preclude a creator, but it does place limits on when he might have carried out his job.' From this I feel Science leaves the door quite open and does not go further due to limitations within it as God is ineffable, Human beings and Science can only explain so much as we do not have ability to explain everything. Thus, scientific theories could be used to strengthen the existence of God through Cosmology but only so far. In order for the Cosmological argument to succeed several arguments also need to be considered. For example the Design argument. 1 Neesha Parmar Mrs Lockyer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    There is no real way to conclude the arguments. In this way, the design argument is failing again. Another theist, Emmanuel Kant pointed out in his argument, that the argument for a divine designer depends on the assumption that there is actually design in the universe.

  2. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    the universe has a cause it doesn't necessarily mean that the universe has a cause, and why can't the universe be self causing. 'To move from 'everything that we observe has a cause to the universe has a cause is too big a leap in logic' David Hume.'

  1. An explanation and evaluation of the different perspectives on religion offered by Richard Dawkins ...

    one cannot be half or "partially" correct. Despite the fact that science does not brush with religion on some very important issues, there is a lot of very critical inconsistency between the two (no being can exist beyond the universe and mot certainly cannot deny the rules to which this universe conforms e.g.

  2. Man and the Universe

    he separated the light from the darkness" [Genesis 1:3-4]). Many see the dividing of day and night as symbolism of God separating good from evil. * Second Day: The firmament of heaven (known as the Sky) was created. This separated the 'two waters' or the sky and the seas ("Let

  1. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    Hume through the character Philo puts forward criticisms for the design argument. All of Hume's criticisms would count as weaknesses towards the design argument. Hume had several criticisms; his first one was that it is an unsound analogy to be comparing the world to a machine.

  2. Describe the Christian cosmology and the Muslim cosmology.

    Also, the universe still appears to be expanding and as the galaxies and planets move away from each other, they move into longer (red) wavelengths. This is called the Red Shift. One scientist, Charles Darwin, also said that we have evolved from apes and there would have been a time where there were no humans.

  1. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    There would then be nothing outside the thing or being to cause contradiction, since the necessity is meant to arise from within it, and there can be no contradictions from within the thing because we have rejected it. There is no such thing as a level of existence; things either exist or they don't.

  2. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    been very carefully chosen indeed, if the hot big bang model were correct right back to the beginning of time". It is important to recognise the difference between unlikely and impossible; as although the creation of the universe occurring, purely as the result of a million and more variables all

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work