• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far have the theories of the modern sciencetists about the origin of the universe strengthened the case for the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


How far have the theories of the modern scientists about the origins of the universe strengthened the case for the existence of God? The cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it. The existence of the universe, the argument claims, stands in need of explanation, and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by God. The cosomological argument states; Everything that exists has a cause of its existence, the universe exists so therefore it has a cause, if the universe has a cause of its existence, then that cause is God. This then concludes that God exists. The vast advancements of Science through scientific theories about the origins of the universe could be said to have strengthened the Cosmological argument for the existence of God, however this could also be challenged and could be used to weaken the argument for the existence of God. One of the theories put forward, was the Steady State theory. This theory denies that the universe has a beginning. ...read more.


People can understand this theory from two points. Some would go on to say that it was a deliberate action by God and therefore the Big Bang is divine, thus strengthening the argument for the existence of God. However some would take another route such as athiests and go on to say that it was not divine and does not verify the existence of God, as it all occurred by chance. Thus, weakening the argument for the existence of God. Polkinghorne went along the lines of believing that the Big Bang was created by God and was not a random event as even a minute change could may even result in an explosion. He went on to say that, 'we should look to God's existence as an aid for understanding why things have developed in the physical world by the manner that they have.' Polkinghorne claimed that religion and science were intellectual cousins, religion asks why? And science asks hows? Therefore both religion and Science are working to discover the origins of the universe, but from two difference perspectives. The so-called Kalam argument highlights the sequence of cases that resulted in our world cannot be infinite, since infinity in face cannot be known or concieved. ...read more.


This could be example could then be used for the existence of God, even though we cannot prove that he does exist, we can understand the existence of God and thus conclude that he created the universe. In conclusion, I feel that Science does strengthen the case for the existence of God in some respect through cosmology. Although, the Cosmological argument does need more than Scientific theories in order for it to be successful. The design argument as Davis suggests could be some evidence along with the Cosmological argument to prove the existence of God. Stephen Hawking went onto say 'an expanding universe does not preclude a creator, but it does place limits on when he might have carried out his job.' From this I feel Science leaves the door quite open and does not go further due to limitations within it as God is ineffable, Human beings and Science can only explain so much as we do not have ability to explain everything. Thus, scientific theories could be used to strengthen the existence of God through Cosmology but only so far. In order for the Cosmological argument to succeed several arguments also need to be considered. For example the Design argument. 1 Neesha Parmar Mrs Lockyer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    of particular things; I see no reason whatsoever to suppose that the total has any cause whatsoever...what im saying is that the concept of cause is not applicable to the total' Bertrand Russell. This is similar to David Hume's criticism as he also maintained that the fact that everything within

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    most efficient characteristics of each species would be passed down through the generations, within the genes. Random variations within the natural world allow some animals and plants to survive more efficiently than weaker ones, so they are more likely to live longer than the weaker ones.

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    with contempt and disdain, as the commonly held belief at that time was that there was a Divine Creator, and the world was literally created as it is written in Genesis. Darwin however went against this belief, suggesting instead that every single living organism comes from a common ancestor, some simple life form that everything developed from.

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    For example we learn the meaning of the word pain because we hear the word being used in context when someone is experiencing pain and we can tell whether someone knows what a word means if they use the word correctly.

  1. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    This universe-maker can be called God. Consider this diagram.8 I will now rehearse the design argument as expressed by David Hume9, through Cleanthes, using analogy. Hume follows Plato's method and writes in the form of a debate between two main characters: Cleanthes and Philo. Cleanthes is used to put forward the argument; and Philo is then

  2. Describe the Christian cosmology and the Muslim cosmology.

    Also, the universe still appears to be expanding and as the galaxies and planets move away from each other, they move into longer (red) wavelengths. This is called the Red Shift. One scientist, Charles Darwin, also said that we have evolved from apes and there would have been a time where there were no humans.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    Einstein's equation admits of many solutions and it is an empirical question which solution describes our universe. The Friedmann solutions (first obtained by Friedmann in 1922 and 19249) are the ones thought to apply to our universe. H is solution describe a universe that is perfectly isotropic (it looks the same in every direction)

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    suggest that there is a divine-law giver who wrote all of these rules; "It is impossible to think of a command without a commander." Owen's point was that since rules do not write themselves, they must either be brute facts requiring no explanation or put there by God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work