• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How people make decisions.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How people make decisions Word count: 1360 "In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters through which one perceives the world." Discuss and evaluate this claim. In order to truly comprehend the claim that "In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters through which one perceives the world," one could consider the quote, "[when] The rubber tree won't yield latex: the biologist blames the sapling, the geologist blames the soil, the contractor blames the unskilled laborer and owner says it is fighting back at being controlled," by Amitav Ghosh. This quote accurately portrays the differences in the way people view the world. In the quote Ghosh talks about how four different people will look at the same thing, yet see it in four different ways. Because of the fact that different ways and areas of knowledge affect the choices we make, we often make choices by actually comparing between the areas and ways of knowing. The most common areas of knowledge that people most commonly use are ethics and history, both ancient and recent, authority and science. People tend to look at things from as scientific view and then compare their view with one of ethical perspective. ...read more.

Middle

Historians have the hard task of looking at many different points of view in order to try and somewhat accurately recreate history. Historians have long realized that people view things differently based on their different ethical standpoints, past experiences, and the history of their time. Their task is to try and see through the filter to see things as they really where (Writing History). Take for example the history of the military action at My Lai. The Americans and Vietnamese both had different tales of what happened at My Lai (Something Dark...). Now historians face the difficult task of trying to clear away the screens people viewed the whole operation through and reconstruct what actually happened. The ethical filter that people often view things through is often one of the hardest to 'see through.' Everyone in the world has different ethical views. Terrorists have ethical beliefs and views that are vastly different from the beliefs we have. People who can commit murder without any remorse have different ethical perspectives than we do. It is very difficult to get through this 'filter' to the reality behind it. Even then, you are not really getting through the 'ethical filter' you are just changing things so that they are viewed in light of your own ethical beliefs. ...read more.

Conclusion

Cloning according to people using ethics as an area of knowledge is unethical. They say that you would not only be messing around with God's creations but that you would be creating a person just so that you could improve the life of another person. A scientist would look at the situation as one of immense benefit. If people could have clones created with the exact same metabolic structure you could easily perform transplants of organs and tissues and blood etc. This would improve the quality of life for humans from a scientific standpoint but destroy is from an ethical standpoint. As we have seen, when people view the world and events and make decisions and choices and have even simple thoughts about something, they do so through a sort of 'filter' of past experiences and past decisions, their own ethical views, history, and science and try to tie things together logically. Everyone views things with their own biases and their own personal experiences. This is a key concept to grasp in order to find out how things really are. One must understand that reality is hidden behind the 'filters' that people view the world through. It is only once one has attempted to see through the filters that other people judge the world through, that one can understand what actually happened. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the twentieth ...

    moral choice every time, especially as we may not have all the information required by the hedonic calculus or the simply the time and encourages quite extreme results. If taken literally, all leisure activity would end, as the money spent on that activity could cause more people a greater, higher quality pleasure if given to charity, or to a beggar.

  2. Christian Views on Wealth & poverty

    Jesus told this story to illustrate the phrase; "love your neighbour as yourself.." Jesus used two mortal enemies, the Samaritans, and the Jews. In this story, the one who showed the injured man any sympathy, was not the priest, or the Levite, but, the person that did show this Jew any compassion, was their arch enemy the Samaritan.

  1. In the essay "On The Rainy River," the author Tim O'Brien tells about his ...

    People often treat others of different nationalities differently. This in turn forms how you look at people of different decent also. Traditions within your nationality help to form some of your moral values also. The way your ancestors lived and what kind of people the were are a major influence on Vietnamese traditions.

  2. How does E.R. make use of the Conventions of a hospital drama?

    The use of special effects and expensive set pieces, which other hospital dramas probably couldn't afford. There are even more reasons for E.R's popularity but these are the main ones.

  1. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    of scientific aspects of the protocol by a sponsor or care organisations means the new breed of ethics committees will discuss safety and very vaguely defined ethics only. 24 The main aim since the birth of the Declaration of Helsinki has primarily being the safety of the research participants above all else.

  2. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    He also believed in consequentialism. This meant judging rightness and wrongness of actions depended on our evaluation of the consequences. Therefore good and bad can only be judged after the event has taken place. This meant intention did not matter, only the result of the action did.

  1. I have raised myself to a state of affluence and some degree of reputation ...

    However, once again his ambitious and pragmatic character gets the best of him. "Frugality and Industry, by freeing me from my remaining Debt, and producing Affluence and Independence would make more easy the Practice of Sincerity and Justice," (594). On analyzing Ben's priority of virtues, it is interesting to note

  2. How Successful is The Co-operative Banks Ethical policy?

    The firm could use this as a unique selling point for the product/service. 7. Ultimately it will improve the bottom line of business, which is to make a profit. It will do this using all the advantages described. The Co-Operative bank is a part of the Co-Op group which is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work