• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ought The UK and The USA attack Iraq?

Extracts from this document...


Ought The UK and The USA attack Iraq? I think that the UK and USA should not attack Iraq, at least not on their own. If they were to get the full support of the UN, then possibly an attack of some form should be fought against Iraq, however a full-scale invasion may not be the answer. In the light of experience, there can hardly be any doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime represents a threat to the Middle East region in the medium to long term. On the evidence available it represents no immediate threat. If this is correct, there is no case for military action in the near future: there are several courses of action that can be adopted short of war, and on moral and other grounds, war should be a last resort. Invasion of Iraq would involve the killing of large numbers of innocent Iraqi civilians, as well as large numbers of soldiers on both sides. ...read more.


Bombings outside the 'no fly zones' such as the December 1998 'Desert Fox' Bombing of Baghdad, have also killed and wounded innocent Iraqis. How can the US be allowed to murder innocent civilians, and claim that it is stopping a rogue dictator. I believe that the USA has already taken it too far and for Iraq there is no going back, they have seen so many people of their nation murdered, so they feel they have to retaliate. Already enough harm has been done to Iraq, the sanctions against Iraq, the most severe ever imposed on any nation, have contributed to the deaths of countless Iraqi civilians and have devastated Iraq's economy. A 1999 UNICEF study of child mortality in Iraq concluded that if pre 1990 trends in child mortality had continued through the 1990s, 500,000 fewer Iraqi children under the age of 5 would have died between 1991 and 1998. Today, it is widely estimated that over 1,500,000 Iraqis have died as a direct result of the deprivation wrought by sanctions. ...read more.


This seems to me to suggest that the USA want an attack on Iraq so badly that they will use any excuse possible to try and justify their cause. Yes Iraq should not be allowed to develop weapons of mass destruction, but this can be resolved by talks and by allowing weapons inspectors into Iraq. In the absence of democratic institutions within Iraq, pressure applied to the Iraqi government in the form of sanctions has not produced democratic change, but has merely worsened the condition of ordinary people. An invasion would involve further destruction of Iraq's infrastructure, already reeling from twelve years of sanctions and bombings, thus weakening the prospects for the creation of stable, democratic institutions in Iraq. Nearly the entire world community is opposed to a US invasion of Iraq. This opposition is in accordance with international law, particularly the UN charter, which prohibits such violations of Iraqi sovereignty. Only the Iraqi people have the sovereign authority to determine what type of government they live under, and how to deal with those who have violated their human rights. O.Armitstead 09/09/02 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Violence in the South of Thailand

    This will not only worsen the situation, but might result in more deadly effects of the security of the provinces and of the country. However, the government has also taken some proper steps that might help in solving the South Problem.

  2. "Should America have gone to war against Iraq?"

    America then responded a month later by attacking Iraqi military headquarters in Baghdad. There was always a sign that Iraq were either having or developing these harmful weapons and that Saddam was always capable of using these weapons. Although Iraq withdrew from Kuwait in 1991, the war between Iraq and America was always there.

  1. Should There be War in Iraq?

    purpose of establishing an alliance between Hussein and Bin Laden based on their mutual hatred for the United States and Israel.

  2. Anthrax Threat.

    In 1998, The Secretary of Defense William Cohen approved the vaccination plan based on the successful completion of all testing and operational criteria. Between now and about 2005, the entire force, including all new service member will begin receiving the six-shot series of the anthrax vaccination in a phased immunization program.

  1. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    The attack, reported as being the work of terrorist, would establish yet again a new threat for the United States. Though no actual "Weapons of Mass Destruction" were used, it became apparent that there were individuals, groups and/or states that were looking to hurt the United States, as such attempting

  2. There is a massive difference between rich nations and poorer ones, which grows larger ...

    These organisations take the money given to them and use it to help people. Christian Aid, for example, uses the money it gets for development work, emergency relief, campaigning and educating people and other overseas work. Over 40 churches in the UK are part of it and its income is �40 million a year.

  1. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    6) Innocent civilians should not be killed. So most Christians believe that a war can be just if it is considered to be right and fair. For example World War one could be called a just war because: 1) The war was controlled and started by the authority 2)

  2. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    We weren't particularly worried about him using weapons of mass destruction then and he is significantly weaker and less technologically supported than he was then. So why is it we feel it necessary to go to war with him now?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work