• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ought The UK and The USA attack Iraq?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ought The UK and The USA attack Iraq? I think that the UK and USA should not attack Iraq, at least not on their own. If they were to get the full support of the UN, then possibly an attack of some form should be fought against Iraq, however a full-scale invasion may not be the answer. In the light of experience, there can hardly be any doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime represents a threat to the Middle East region in the medium to long term. On the evidence available it represents no immediate threat. If this is correct, there is no case for military action in the near future: there are several courses of action that can be adopted short of war, and on moral and other grounds, war should be a last resort. Invasion of Iraq would involve the killing of large numbers of innocent Iraqi civilians, as well as large numbers of soldiers on both sides. ...read more.

Middle

Bombings outside the 'no fly zones' such as the December 1998 'Desert Fox' Bombing of Baghdad, have also killed and wounded innocent Iraqis. How can the US be allowed to murder innocent civilians, and claim that it is stopping a rogue dictator. I believe that the USA has already taken it too far and for Iraq there is no going back, they have seen so many people of their nation murdered, so they feel they have to retaliate. Already enough harm has been done to Iraq, the sanctions against Iraq, the most severe ever imposed on any nation, have contributed to the deaths of countless Iraqi civilians and have devastated Iraq's economy. A 1999 UNICEF study of child mortality in Iraq concluded that if pre 1990 trends in child mortality had continued through the 1990s, 500,000 fewer Iraqi children under the age of 5 would have died between 1991 and 1998. Today, it is widely estimated that over 1,500,000 Iraqis have died as a direct result of the deprivation wrought by sanctions. ...read more.

Conclusion

This seems to me to suggest that the USA want an attack on Iraq so badly that they will use any excuse possible to try and justify their cause. Yes Iraq should not be allowed to develop weapons of mass destruction, but this can be resolved by talks and by allowing weapons inspectors into Iraq. In the absence of democratic institutions within Iraq, pressure applied to the Iraqi government in the form of sanctions has not produced democratic change, but has merely worsened the condition of ordinary people. An invasion would involve further destruction of Iraq's infrastructure, already reeling from twelve years of sanctions and bombings, thus weakening the prospects for the creation of stable, democratic institutions in Iraq. Nearly the entire world community is opposed to a US invasion of Iraq. This opposition is in accordance with international law, particularly the UN charter, which prohibits such violations of Iraqi sovereignty. Only the Iraqi people have the sovereign authority to determine what type of government they live under, and how to deal with those who have violated their human rights. O.Armitstead 09/09/02 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Should There be War in Iraq?

    purpose of establishing an alliance between Hussein and Bin Laden based on their mutual hatred for the United States and Israel.

  2. Violence in the South of Thailand

    only further bitter the relations between the government and the locals and cause more violence to spread. PM Thaksin believes that the only way to solve the problem is to find the ones who caused the January assault and to bring them to action, even if this needs violence.

  1. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    message to the rest of the world that has left virtually no country unaffected. As such, this has become the focus of our research and objective of our study; to identify the current policy, global objectives, and security concerns of the United States regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction and how

  2. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    Iraq could and there is some evidence that Iraq does have connections to terrorist organisations. So, the UK may trust Iraq not to use these weapons, but how can we trust Iraq not to pass them onto terrorist groups such as Al Queda.

  1. There is a massive difference between rich nations and poorer ones, which grows larger ...

    He did this even at his poorest. This practice is known as tithing and some Christians do this as their way of helping the poor. The other way is to give away all your wealth and possessions. The Iona community share in this idea.

  2. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    Early Christians believed in non-violence and did not retaliate when persecuted. As Jesus said 'turn the other cheek' and later Mahatma Gandhi, a Christian who remained a pacifist throughout his life said 'an eye for an eye, only makes the whole world go blind'.

  1. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    and programmes such as Strategies with Kids, Information for Parents (SKIP), the Ministry of Social Development programme to provide parents with non-violent means of disciplining children along with strategies to raise happy and healthy children. It is recognised that many initiatives and practices to address family violence will cross all

  2. Biological terrorism.

    There are too many factors that have to be accounted for in the use of biological weapons. The components of these weapons are living, making them able to adapt and spread. Total control of an agent would be impossible it were released into the environment ("Plague...").

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work