01/05/2007

Afsor Ullah 11p Religious Studies Coursework

Religion, Wealth and Poverty

  The world today is divided into two parts; the ‘rich’ north and the ‘poor’ south. Whilst most of the world’s money is concentrated in the north, the south is left to fend for itself. There is a great need for world development for countries in the south as these countries withhold seventy-five percent of the earths population yet only acquire twenty percent of the worlds income. In reality for a less developed country to recuperate is almost impossible due the financial debts that are due to other countries, which seem to rise through years. 12.8 billion dollars was paid by Chile when it only loaned 3.9 billion. That extra nine billion dollars could have gone towards developing Chile, instead it went towards greedy rich countries. Many low developed countries are unable to pay of debts for financial reasons and thus they are only able to cultivate and trade crops rather than consume them, ultimately causing lack of food, thus bringing about starvation. Low developed countries also are situated in areas, which suffer natural disasters such as floods, and earthquakes that can destroy fertile land used for cultivation, which may be the source of income for a country and if it is not sustainable the country will suffer financially causing further problems. Unless the country can afford to organise an irrigation system, droughts will also affect them. Countries in Africa have been severely affected by conflicts due to the European empire in the nineteenth century. Other countries such as Afghanistan and Russia, Somalia and Ethiopia have also suffered from confrontations between countries. Were we to look at the rate of children we would realize that eighteen in every thousand die before their fifth birthday in the north whilst 17 6 in every thousand die before their fifth birthday in the south. Life expectancy is up to seventy in the north but only up to fifty in the south. Other factors that contribute to world poverty in the globe is because countries lack resources such as fresh water, causing disease, education and due to the fact that a country may rely on an export whose value is not sustainable which causes poverty overnight. The developed countries should fund, help, co-operate and support those less fortunate countries.

  Both the southern and the northern hemisphere contain Muslims and Christians who both follow a religion that encourages the tackling of world poverty.

  Christianity, a world faith, claims that wealth has been achieved through God’s blessing and therefore Christians should use their wealth in accordance of His wishes (i.e. charity) and not be greedy with it. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus showed that the commandment to love God and love their neighbours means they must help anyone in need regardless of the area they inhabit. This belief outlines what a Christians attitude towards world poverty should be. Jesus also gave the analogy of ‘a rich man’ to following God to  ‘a camel going through the eye of a needle’, outlining the necessity of giving up wealth in order to enter ‘the Kingdom’. He also taught the dangers of acquiring or desiring too much wealth and warned believers of ‘temptation’, ‘trap’(s) and ‘harmful desires’ that will ‘plunge’ people into ‘ruin and destruction’ as Jesus believed that ‘love for money’ was ‘a root to all kinds of evil’ Jesus also cautioned Christians too much wealth can deviate you from the path of God and warned that ‘No-one can love two masters’, saying how you may ‘love on and hate the other’ 4

Join now!

  We are able to see a stark contrast to how modern Christians have acknowledged these warnings in comparison to their predecessors. Today, as the world seems to become more secular, many people feel that being prosperous is their aspiration in life. The financial success of charities does not even compare to the superb success of the National Lottery and other means of gambling, showing how much a Christian craves for wealth. If we look at how western leaders such as Bush and Blair have ‘helped their neighbours’, we find that they are hardly doing much. In recent events, they ...

This is a preview of the whole essay