• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Debate over the merits of capital punishment has endured for years, and continues to be an extremely indecisive and complicated issue.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Debate over the merits of capital punishment has endured for years, and continues to be an extremely indecisive and complicated issue. Adversaries of capital punishment point to the Marshalls and the Millgards, while proponents point to the Dahmers and Gacys. Society must be kept safe from the monstrous barbaric acts of these individuals and other killers, by taking away their lives to function and perform in our society. At the same time, we must insure that innocent people such as Marshall and Millgard are never convicted or sentenced to death for a crime that they did not commit. Many contend that the use of capital punishment as a form of deterrence does not work, as there are no fewer murders on a per- capita basis in countries or states that do have it, then those that do not. In order for capital punishment to work as a deterrence, certain events must be present in the criminal\'s mind prior to committing the offence. The criminal must be aware that others have been punished in the past for the offence that he or she is planning, and that what happened to another individual who committed this offence, can also happen to me. ...read more.

Middle

Most supporters of the death penalty feel that offenders should be punished for their crimes, and that it does not matter whether it will deter the crime rate. Supporters of the death penalty are in favour of making examples out of offenders, and that the threat of death will be enough to deter the crime rate, but the crime rate is irrelevant. According to Isaac Ehrlich's study, published on April 16, 1976, eight murders are deterred for each execution that is carried out in the U.S.A. He goes on to say, "If one execution of a guilty capital murderer deters the murder of one innocent life, the execution is justified." To most supporters of the death penalty, like Ehrlich, if even 1 life is saved, for countless executions of the guilty, it is a good reason for the death penalty. The theory that society engages in murder when executing the guilty, is considered invalid by most supporters, including Ehrlich. He feels that execution of convicted offenders expresses the great value society places on innocent life. Isaac Ehrlich goes on to state that racism is also a point used by death penalty advocates. ...read more.

Conclusion

We personally feel, and our views are backed up by proof, in the form of studies by the likes of Isaac Ehrlich's 1975 and Prof. Stephen K. Layson's, that was published in 1986, and polls that have been taken both in Canada and the United States over the past few years. All of these studies and surveys show that capital punishment is a valid deterrent to crime, and obviously the public, and society as a whole are in favour of it. The death penalty makes would be capital offenders think about weather committing a crime is really worth their lives. Even if capital punishment did not deter crime, the simple fact that it will allow society to "get even" with murders. Capital punishment also insures peace of mind because it insures that murders will never kill again. 1 From: Take Notice, (Copp Clarke Pitman Ltd., 1979) page 163 2 From: Article written by David Vienneau published in the March 24, 1987 edition of the "Toronto Star", titled, Debate Agonizing for MPs. 3 From: Article written by Kirk Makir, published in March 26, 1987 edition of the "Globe and Mail", titled, BC MPs Split on Death Penalty Debate. 4 From: Article written by Hugh Winsor, published in April 29, 1987 edition of the "Globe and Mail", titled, Debate on Death Penalty placed on hold. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. The Punishment must fit the crime

    Of course no one in the crowd threw a stone that day. This to Christian represents Jesus' attitude of equality and understanding. Many of the people in the crowd had committed some sin, and although it may not have been as serous as the women's, why should they be so quick to judge and prosecute when they themselves aren't perfect.

  2. Capital Punishment

    pleasures and pains is compared with those of other options and the best result determined. The action that leads to this best consequence is the morally correct one to pursue.

  1. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    when we think of what we were deprived of before we were born is irrational and illogical. We think that if a happy life is good then more of it will be better, but this can't be true as we may lead to fill empty irrational desires.

  2. Ironic Examples in "The Bet"

    all the knowledge and wisdom he has gained, while the banker is feeling confined from his thoughts of what he is going to do about giving the last of his money up. Ironically, the roles are inverted, instead of the lawyer feeling restricted, he feels free, and instead of the banker feeling free, he feels confined.

  1. The albatross is described to be "a Christian soul" and it was acclaimed at ...

    bird is made a Christian as well - a messenger from God. When the mariner kills the albatross, he commits a grave killing and sin as the Ten Commandments state: "Thou shalt not kill." However, more importantly the mariner commits a heresy and a profanity by killing the albatross, as

  2. Capital Punishment

    Indeed, one might reasonably expect that in many developing countries executions are substantially cheaper than life imprisonment costs. Assuming that critics of capital punishment object to its practice in any country, this argument not only lacks universal application, but might in fact be used as an argument in favor of capital punishment in countries with less expensive appeals processes.

  1. Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane.

    (Potas, 1987, p.5) The most compelling argument against capital punishment is the risk of killing an innocent person. While international laws have restricted and in some cases even banned the death penalty, some countries still sanction capital punishment. Supporters of the death penalty often argue that improvements in the criminal

  2. Capital punishment has been a very controversial issue for many years. It is illegal ...

    This makes the audience warm to him and sympathise with his character, although he seems no have no remorse for his crimes yet. As Sister Prejean first enters the prison to meet Poncelet, we see grainy photage from the night of the apparent crime compared with shots of the prison.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work