• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Existence of God

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Blaise Pascal Blaise Pascal was born on the 19th of June 1923 and died on the 19th of August 1662. He was a French mathematician, physicist, inventor, writer and Catholic philosopher. He was known as a child prodigy and by the age of 16 he became one of the leading mathematicians of his day. He was known and still is known as a genius. Pascal did not believe that God existed nor did he believe he ceased to exist. Pascal stated that you need to make a gamble to whether God exists or not and that there is no way anyone can avoid making a gamble on God existing. He said that people have to place a bet whether they like it or not as it is one of the conditions in life. "No choice is a choice" is what Pascal used to say. A choice is inevitable for anyone in this world and eventually they will end up deciding to believe or not to believe in God. ...read more.

Middle

to believe in God. Ludwig Feuerbach Ludwig Feuerbach was born on July 28, 1804 and died on September 13, 1872. He was a German philosopher and anthropologist. Ludwig believed that God simply does not exist due to the fact that he believed that man created a figure called God in need for himself, meaning that Man needs something to believe on or in. He believed that God was projection of a person's imagination who was Omni powerful, present, benevolent and knowledgeable. Personally I really did not like Feuerbach's theory because it is making an extremely big assumption that man created a figure called God in need for himself. There is no physical proof or written evidence for this blasphemy. Feuerbach is trying to say that man created God because they did not like the idea of nothing after death. There is no strong evidence that states that God does exist but there isn't any that God does not exist as well. ...read more.

Conclusion

St Thomas Aquinas St Thomas Aquinas was an Italian Dominican Priest of the Catholic Church who was an immensely influential philosopher and theologian. St Thomas believed that God exists because the universe wouldn't have come out of nothing. Everything has a cause. He said that "something" cannot come from "no-thing" therefore the universe must have a cause. He believed that the first cause is God due to the fact that God is the only uncaused cause. To support this Aquinas used an example of motion. He said that nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality. He is trying to say that if something moved something would have had to move it before for it to move. Logically this makes complete sense however I believe there are some flaws with this "argument". I believe that this theory does not prove that God exist because the uncaused cause does not necessarily have to be God. The uncaused cause can and could have been anything. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Does God Exist?

    This same argument can also be applied to God, he exists in the mind, as we all have a definition of Him and it is not logically impossible that He exists in reality. However things that exist in reality are greater than those that exist in the mind, 'Greater than

  2. Arguments about god.

    The moral argument, we have so many laws in today's life there simply must be some kind of law giver at the start. If a random moral law just existed on its own, (which is actually impossible) there would be no moral foundation for people to believe in it.

  1. "Is God on the side of the poor?"

    Anyone poor is chosen by God, yet anyone who isnt will suffer in the hands of the very same. If God was on the side of the poor, why would he allow suffering? Disease? Famine? Starvation? and Death? These are common traits identified with the word 'poor'.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    As a result there would be no opportunity to develop in Gods likeness- since these qualities are essential in the development of human beings into Gods likeness. Thus, Gods purpose would not be possible in a world free from suffering; the world must contain some natural laws that can produce some suffering.

  1. Shared Traits of the Christian, Islamic and Jewish Interpretations of Their Common God, and ...

    If this is the case, he cannot have flaws. He has no needs. Nor can he have any wants, for to suggest otherwise implies that he is not satisfied with his current state. Dissatisfaction is a product of imperfection, thus a perfect God would be totally satisfied with a static existence; that is to say, he would change nothing.

  2. Does God exist?

    Regardless, I do not see how anyone can be that sure about something which supposedly happened that far in the past, from a book that has been copied and recopied, translated and retranslated, and interpreted and reinterpreted for thousands of years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work