• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Truth or Truths

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TRUTH OR TRUTHS? Since the birth of man until today, there had been many arguments about truth and it will continue existing after today. Some people said that truth is odd, some said that everyone has their own truth. People often say things like: * "Who's to say what's true? Everyone has different experiences; you might even say everyone has a different reality. So what's true is just a matter of opinion." * "Who's to say what's moral or immoral? Everybody has different views (or feelings) about right and wrong; so ethics is just a matter of opinion (or feeling). It's up to the individual or the culture to decide." ...read more.

Middle

Another area where the thought of relativism is right is morality & ethics. Rights and wrongs can change from culture to culture or even in the same culture about these subjects. For example, American women can wear what they want, but an Afghan woman cannot. But there are no certain statements which say that it is wrong for women to wear what they want. There are two kinds of relativism: Epistemological relativism is the view that truth and falsity in general are relative. According to hard core epistemological relativism, everything is a matter of opinion, including science. Ethical relativism is the view that morality is relative. ...read more.

Conclusion

Ideas, statements, people may be true or false, but Truth stands above these things and provides the standard and measure by which they are to be judged." (http://webferret.search.com/click?wf,truth,,www.don-henley.com%2Fmain%2Ftruth.htm,,directhit) As a result, truth is odd and is waiting somewhere to be discovered. (Don't forget; we have nothing to do with ethics while talking about truth.) For example, some people BELIEVED the Earth was flat and some believed it was round, so there were many truths. (Can we call them truths actually?) In fact, it was round, but nobody knew it until they saw it from space. After that, they said, "The truth is that the Earth is round." Was the Earth flat when they said so, and became round later? No, it was always round (the truth was that), but people learned it later. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    Emotivists accept that moral judgements are dependent on one's attitudes, background and emotions, whereas Preciptivists regard ethical statements to have a universal quality as well as expressing an opinion. Moreover, in concurrence with Emotivists, Hare agreed that statements were subjective because moral truth and knowledge did not exist behind them.

  2. How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

    Essentially, slavery cannot be considered objectively right or wrong: any moral viewpoint is merely an opinion which differs from culture to culture. Therefore, it does seem that morality is almost arbitrary from a cultural relativist perspective, because it simply becomes a "description of the values held by a particular society

  1. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    This means it must ensure that all research on it's patients, staff, their private data any other materials that could be traced is carried out according to the framework stated. Having a sponsor would further achieve the goal of adhering to governance protocols, especially if the trust itself is its' own sponsor.

  2. How might a moral relativist respond to the claim that people should always tell ...

    If we find he was like this, or that his action did have these results, then I have confirmed the statement that "Saddam Hussein is a very evil man". If the evidence points in the other direction, then the statement is false.

  1. Can there be a coherent Relativism?

    The question of relativism raises a number of issues that must be dealt with before we attempt to assess the coherency of the thesis as a whole. The first of these, which I feel it necessary to address, is that of authority.

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    that is being contemplated is good or bad, based upon its overall effect on the community. Under these circumstances, moral facts are based upon the judgments of the community. All moral facts are based upon the question "what course of action will produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work