• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Truth or Truths

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TRUTH OR TRUTHS? Since the birth of man until today, there had been many arguments about truth and it will continue existing after today. Some people said that truth is odd, some said that everyone has their own truth. People often say things like: * "Who's to say what's true? Everyone has different experiences; you might even say everyone has a different reality. So what's true is just a matter of opinion." * "Who's to say what's moral or immoral? Everybody has different views (or feelings) about right and wrong; so ethics is just a matter of opinion (or feeling). It's up to the individual or the culture to decide." ...read more.

Middle

Another area where the thought of relativism is right is morality & ethics. Rights and wrongs can change from culture to culture or even in the same culture about these subjects. For example, American women can wear what they want, but an Afghan woman cannot. But there are no certain statements which say that it is wrong for women to wear what they want. There are two kinds of relativism: Epistemological relativism is the view that truth and falsity in general are relative. According to hard core epistemological relativism, everything is a matter of opinion, including science. Ethical relativism is the view that morality is relative. ...read more.

Conclusion

Ideas, statements, people may be true or false, but Truth stands above these things and provides the standard and measure by which they are to be judged." (http://webferret.search.com/click?wf,truth,,www.don-henley.com%2Fmain%2Ftruth.htm,,directhit) As a result, truth is odd and is waiting somewhere to be discovered. (Don't forget; we have nothing to do with ethics while talking about truth.) For example, some people BELIEVED the Earth was flat and some believed it was round, so there were many truths. (Can we call them truths actually?) In fact, it was round, but nobody knew it until they saw it from space. After that, they said, "The truth is that the Earth is round." Was the Earth flat when they said so, and became round later? No, it was always round (the truth was that), but people learned it later. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

    Nevertheless, it still raises doubts over the credibility of Rachels' argument. It is also possible to question Rachels' assertation that different societies have different moral codes. All societies, for instance, prohibit murder, rape and steeling which are all actions that most humans consider morally wrong regardless of the society that they are from.

  2. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    This has, without a doubt, justified the principles of which the Emotive theory is based upon, as it has raised fundamental questions with regards of normative systems of morality. However, intuitionist critics such as Moore, oppose to Emotivist views on ethical statements, as he believes that statements can be verified through intuition.

  1. How might a moral relativist respond to the claim that people should always tell ...

    If we find he was like this, or that his action did have these results, then I have confirmed the statement that "Saddam Hussein is a very evil man". If the evidence points in the other direction, then the statement is false.

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    Who is to judge what makes one individual happy? For example sadists seek their pleasure from experiencing and witnessing pain. This is not applicable to all humans - most of which find on happiness in this was at all. This in turn raises the question as to whether through this definition of happiness; utilitarianism excluded the minority of individuals from sharing the greatest happiness.

  1. Can there be a coherent Relativism?

    The question of relativism raises a number of issues that must be dealt with before we attempt to assess the coherency of the thesis as a whole. The first of these, which I feel it necessary to address, is that of authority.

  2. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    issues and that the scientific responsibilities of protocols must be placed on different governance body. This meant that patient surveys, the suitability of staff involved and the adequacy of research sites can be resolved outside research ethics committees. The Central Office for Research Ethics Committees which is involved in the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work