• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What do I mean when I say, 'I know', and why should anyone believe me?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory of Knowledge Weekly essay: Due: Wednesday, 3rd of September What do I mean when I say, 'I know', and why should anyone believe me? If I said I know something, it means I have knowledge of something or someone. But why should anyone believe me? Ultimately, there are only two ways in which my knowledge can be trustworthy: from personal experience that the person has also personally experienced or from proven facts. I could say I know something because I have personally experienced it. But how would anyone know that I am not lying? They haven't experienced my personal experience. They could have a different interpretation, but as long as their experience is similar they will consider what I know as right, because they can relate to it, and therefore they can believe me. This applies when sharing personal knowledge. When I say I know, I am saying I am a knower. ...read more.

Middle

is in itself something learned, something experienced. The baby is born with human conscience, which is the base for experiences and how they are inter-connected and affect each other, which is the base for all knowledge. There is a main type of knowledge which is reliable to a person when you tell them you know something or someone. That is directly experienced knowledge. By this I mean direct knowledge, or a direct experience, not something someone has told you or that you have read in a book, (because that is also a form of experience.) but something that has happened in front of, or to you. The person you are telling you know something needs to be able to directly relate to their own experience of something. For example if I was dissecting a heart, it would be directly experienced knowledge. But if my biology textbook tells me a heart looks like that, it is indirect experience, and therefore not as reliable as my direct personal experience. ...read more.

Conclusion

Theoretical knowledge is tricky to categorize. If we take the atom theory, no one can prove that it is real, but it seems to be the most reliable and therefore the most accepted idea. Theoretical knowledge is never directly experienced knowledge. Even if you come up with the theory, a theory stays an idea created by the mind due to our reason, which is a result of many experiences. Theoretical knowledge is more or less reliable depending on how many things obey the theory, or that have been proven to be reliable due to the theory. We need to decide for ourselves whether we trust someone saying that they know something or if we don't. We have to keep in mind that direct experiences are more reliable than indirect experiences. We do also need to remember that the direct experiences we have can be fooled with illusions to our senses. No experience is 100% reliable, but ideas and morals which make sense to us or which work for us are usually the ones we accept. Word count: 859 Alex Cunningham 31/8/03 11 SS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. In the essay "On The Rainy River," the author Tim O'Brien tells about his ...

    Either way your friends help build your moral character and your personal identity. Another major influence is your nationality. Your nationality forms who you are and how other people look at you. People often treat others of different nationalities differently.

  2. Explain ethical egoism. Do you believe that it is true? Why or why not?

    the only action that will lead to that goal, because to act in the interest of others while neglecting our interests will lead to our demise. Perhaps the most convincing aspect of ethical egoism is that it answers a necessary question in a necessary way -- that is, we must

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work