• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What in your opinion is the difference between doing the best thing and doing the right thing?

Extracts from this document...


What in your opinion is the difference between doing the best thing and doing the right thing? The essay title addresses morality, however doing the best thing in my opinion focuses on one school of morality and doing the right thing focuses on another. These two different schools of morality are utilitarianism, which in my opinion looks at doing the best thing and Kantian ethics, which looks at doing the right thing. My reasons on why I have made this distinction will be explained through the essay, and at the end I will conclude whether the two schools of ethics do focus on the different aspects, or whether it just appears that they do. Utilitarianism is a moral system based on creating the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number. The theory is very agreeable, however it is clear to see that the notions of intention, motive, rights and fairness are not addressed. Utilitarianism is therefore said to be consequentialist (results based), i.e. ...read more.


It can be seen that trying to save the child may not have been the best thing to do, even though you did it out of a sense of duty, or out of good intention. Therefore as Kantian ethics is not concerned about the consequences of an action (means justify the ends) then is many circumstances, like the one above, one may not choose the best possible action. The distinction between doing the best thing and doing the right thing is already starting to appear, however I will discuss the two schools of morality in more depth, to try and get a more definitive distinction. Kant believes that humans can make moral choices, and therefore if we ought to do something we can do it (ought implies can). The notion of ought for Kant, derived from the fact that humans do not always do what they should (their duty), they often do what they want (desire). For example, I ought to go see my sick granny, but I am going to watch a football match. ...read more.


Another example emphasising this, is the fact that it is possible to universalise an immoral act in Kantian ethics, so long as it still passes the principle of ends test. Any immoral act cannot be considered to be doing the right thing. To conclude, I believe that there is a different between the right thing and the best thing. Doing the best thing seems to be based on the outcome of an action (consequentialist), and not interested in the way the outcome is achieved. Doing the right thing however seems to be based on the sense of duty, i.e. the intention of your action, and is not interested in the consequences of an action. With these clear distinctions, they seem to fall nicely into either a utilitarian or a Kantian view, as utilitarianism is consequentialist based, and Kantian ethics is intention based. However there are also instances where they do not fall so easily into these categories. Even thought they may not be able to fit into either moral school perfectly, there is still a clear and distinct difference between doing the best thing and doing the right thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    If the bad consequences are greater, then the action is morally wrong. This process is more subjective and can not be universally applied whereas Kantianism can be. Also, one's person determination of what produces the greatest consequence may not be same another person's, therefore this theory is inconsistent and a universal law cannot be applied from it.

  2. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    Under utilitarianism this person should sacrifice him or herself in order to save the other five. This situation clearly shows how unrealistic the demands of the utilitarians are. Why should someone voluntarily give up their own life in order to save the lives of 5 strangers?

  1. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    Emotivists accept that moral judgements are dependent on one's attitudes, background and emotions, whereas Preciptivists regard ethical statements to have a universal quality as well as expressing an opinion. Moreover, in concurrence with Emotivists, Hare agreed that statements were subjective because moral truth and knowledge did not exist behind them.

  2. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    It was called Christian reconstruction in Europe. The name was soon changed when the world council of churches was founded in 1948 and the work became part of the British council of churches. It became know as The Department of Inter-Church Aid and Refugee Service.

  1. Euthanasia can never be justified

    considered, mostly the family and friends of the patient, who will be deeply saddened by this decision. We also have to consider that other patients in a similar situation may feel pressured to do the same by the decision of this patient.

  2. What are the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Examine and consider ...

    Utilitarianism exists also in the form of act and rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is situational, where every action is judged in its own circumstances in order to reach a morally correct conclusion. In the form of act, utilitarianism has the ability to be flexible in that it doesn't allow the definition of pleasure or happiness to be limited.

  1. Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features ...

    His proof was based on human experience and proposed that no one who has experienced a higher pleasure would sacrifice that knowledge for an experience, however intense, of a lower pleasure. This is illustrated perfectly in the play "Educating Rita" by Willie .....Where a working class woman experiences the higher

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    What they are saying is that the motive behind such actions is always ultimately selfish. For example, a man who is in a position to save a persons life, may do so because everyone will look up to them, or because they would not be able to live with themselves

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work