• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What in your opinion is the difference between doing the best thing and doing the right thing?

Extracts from this document...


What in your opinion is the difference between doing the best thing and doing the right thing? The essay title addresses morality, however doing the best thing in my opinion focuses on one school of morality and doing the right thing focuses on another. These two different schools of morality are utilitarianism, which in my opinion looks at doing the best thing and Kantian ethics, which looks at doing the right thing. My reasons on why I have made this distinction will be explained through the essay, and at the end I will conclude whether the two schools of ethics do focus on the different aspects, or whether it just appears that they do. Utilitarianism is a moral system based on creating the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number. The theory is very agreeable, however it is clear to see that the notions of intention, motive, rights and fairness are not addressed. Utilitarianism is therefore said to be consequentialist (results based), i.e. ...read more.


It can be seen that trying to save the child may not have been the best thing to do, even though you did it out of a sense of duty, or out of good intention. Therefore as Kantian ethics is not concerned about the consequences of an action (means justify the ends) then is many circumstances, like the one above, one may not choose the best possible action. The distinction between doing the best thing and doing the right thing is already starting to appear, however I will discuss the two schools of morality in more depth, to try and get a more definitive distinction. Kant believes that humans can make moral choices, and therefore if we ought to do something we can do it (ought implies can). The notion of ought for Kant, derived from the fact that humans do not always do what they should (their duty), they often do what they want (desire). For example, I ought to go see my sick granny, but I am going to watch a football match. ...read more.


Another example emphasising this, is the fact that it is possible to universalise an immoral act in Kantian ethics, so long as it still passes the principle of ends test. Any immoral act cannot be considered to be doing the right thing. To conclude, I believe that there is a different between the right thing and the best thing. Doing the best thing seems to be based on the outcome of an action (consequentialist), and not interested in the way the outcome is achieved. Doing the right thing however seems to be based on the sense of duty, i.e. the intention of your action, and is not interested in the consequences of an action. With these clear distinctions, they seem to fall nicely into either a utilitarian or a Kantian view, as utilitarianism is consequentialist based, and Kantian ethics is intention based. However there are also instances where they do not fall so easily into these categories. Even thought they may not be able to fit into either moral school perfectly, there is still a clear and distinct difference between doing the best thing and doing the right thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    There total income was �2,500,000. In the seventies they focused on there long time plans for getting people to be self-sufficient. There total income was almost �5.5 million. In the seventies they realised there self-sufficiency plans were not enough. The banks were charging to higher loan interest rates.

  2. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    Under utilitarianism this person should sacrifice him or herself in order to save the other five. This situation clearly shows how unrealistic the demands of the utilitarians are. Why should someone voluntarily give up their own life in order to save the lives of 5 strangers?

  1. Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features ...

    To a certain extent I think that we are utilitarian, or at least, that the greatest happiness principle is one of our basic moral principles. But are we total utilitarian's? I think not, however, here are three questions that I came across that helped me evaluate the criticisms of utilitarian;

  2. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    Overall, scholars who believe that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion are non-cognitivist. Non-cognitive theories such as Emotivism and Prescriptivism support the claim that moral statements are based on subjective views, which cannot be verified as having factual content.

  1. Euthanasia can never be justified

    Surah 2:153 Muslims also believe that no one has the right to chose when they die or has the right to interfere with God's choices for us. When their time...arrives they cannot tarry for a single hour nor can they go ahead.

  2. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Business managers, governors, as well as the other professionals also use this theory when they are making decisions, for example, whether to employ new staff, whether to ban smoking in public places, or whether to invest in a new market.

  1. What are the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Examine and consider ...

    The theory of Utilitarianism is recognised as a universal theory, meaning that it can be applied to literally every situation. It addition to this, Utilitarianism is egalitarian, meaning that it does not consider one person's definition of pleasure to be of a higher state than another, in other words, it

  2. Is what promotes the greatest good for the greatest number necessarily morally right?

    These photos that are taken are then distributed over the net so other paedophiles can gain pleasure from them. According to a utilitarian their actions would be justified because it brought about the greatest amount of pleasure to the greatest number, and the manner in which they achieved this is irrelevant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work