• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

William Paley (CE 1743-1805) believed that the universe must have a designer; he believed this designer was God.

Extracts from this document...


William Paley (CE 1743-1805) believed that the universe must have a designer; he believed this designer was God. His first argument to support his theory was design qua purpose. Paley believed that it was evident that nature came together for a purpose and not by chance. He used the human eye as an example. He argued that the eye was designed to serve a purpose for seeing and its complexity proposes that it must have come from an intellectual designer. Paley also uses the example of the watch and the stone. A stone has no purpose and no outstanding design. A watch however comprises of complex components that serve the purpose of telling the time and if one component were out of its order then the watch would fail to work. Therefore someone must have designed it with, intelligence, wisdom and thought. ...read more.


David Hume was a philosopher during a time where there were very strong catholic beliefs. He criticised Paley's argument of God as a designer. He was urged by friends not to speak publicly about his beliefs, as this would cause great uproar, so he asked that his views were published after his death. He criticised that "this world, for all he knows, is very faulty and imperfect, compared to a superior standard."(Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, 1779)." Hume believed that the world had its faults and questioned why such a superior being like God would leave it imperfect. This is a very strong criticism because although there are such beautiful things around us for example rainbows and trees yet there are also many aspects that cause hurt and suffering such as hurricanes, earthquakes and disease. Hume questioned whether God gave up on this world and continued to make another perfect world. ...read more.


Darwin's theory could well be accurate, as a giraffe has adapted to have a long neck in order to survive. A chameleon changes its colour to adapt to its surroundings. However this theory still does not include a designer and does not give explanation of the formation of complexity and design of things such as the human eye. In conclusion to both sides of the argument, the argument for the belief that the universe has a designer at work appears to be stronger than its criticisms. Both aspects of Paley's argument have evidence behind to support what he says. It is also possible to relate what Paley says to the things around us, for example a bird has wings for the purpose of flight and the regularity of the solar system. Hume gives good criticisms, but to say that the world has evolved with no designer does not give explanation for the beauty, regularity and purpose around us. The Design Argument Holly Devlin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    Sceptics have long argued against the arguments from proof and cause. David Hume pointed out that God's ideas were no true explanation of the material world, since a mental world required a cause just as much as any other. And if we had to stop our questioning there, then why not stop at the material world?

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    compels people to act in a certain way, regardless of the consequences. Kant argued that there are certain, rationally discoverable laws called the categorical imperative. Kant moved on to wonder if any conclusion could be drawn about whether morality is a matter of applying rational thought to discover categorical imperatives.

  1. Man and the Universe

    As was stated before, the universe was created in six days, the seventh being for rest. Here is the order of the creation of the universe: * First Day: Light was created and divided ("'Let there be light' - and light appeared...

  2. Augustine believed that God is wholly good and made the world perfect

    This is why we have earthquakes and tsunamis. Even with all the sins we have committed, Augustine believes that God is graceful and sent Jesus to take the penalties of our sins, so that we may all go to heaven. The strength of this theory is that it is a good answer to the problem of evil, allowing

  1. Where did the universe come from, has it evolved or has it been created ...

    The second type of argument is the Evolutionary theories, which explains how living things came to be like they are today. In 1859, Charles Darwin published 'On the Origin of Species'. In this book he argued that all life on the planet originated from simple cells.

  2. "Design and the working out of an underlying purpose is evident in the world. ...

    Paley said, "Just as the discovery of a watch on a heath could not be satisfactorily explained by saying it had always been there. The order evident in the universe demands an explanation. The watch is an analogy for the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work