• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

William Paley (CE 1743-1805) believed that the universe must have a designer; he believed this designer was God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

William Paley (CE 1743-1805) believed that the universe must have a designer; he believed this designer was God. His first argument to support his theory was design qua purpose. Paley believed that it was evident that nature came together for a purpose and not by chance. He used the human eye as an example. He argued that the eye was designed to serve a purpose for seeing and its complexity proposes that it must have come from an intellectual designer. Paley also uses the example of the watch and the stone. A stone has no purpose and no outstanding design. A watch however comprises of complex components that serve the purpose of telling the time and if one component were out of its order then the watch would fail to work. Therefore someone must have designed it with, intelligence, wisdom and thought. ...read more.

Middle

David Hume was a philosopher during a time where there were very strong catholic beliefs. He criticised Paley's argument of God as a designer. He was urged by friends not to speak publicly about his beliefs, as this would cause great uproar, so he asked that his views were published after his death. He criticised that "this world, for all he knows, is very faulty and imperfect, compared to a superior standard."(Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, 1779)." Hume believed that the world had its faults and questioned why such a superior being like God would leave it imperfect. This is a very strong criticism because although there are such beautiful things around us for example rainbows and trees yet there are also many aspects that cause hurt and suffering such as hurricanes, earthquakes and disease. Hume questioned whether God gave up on this world and continued to make another perfect world. ...read more.

Conclusion

Darwin's theory could well be accurate, as a giraffe has adapted to have a long neck in order to survive. A chameleon changes its colour to adapt to its surroundings. However this theory still does not include a designer and does not give explanation of the formation of complexity and design of things such as the human eye. In conclusion to both sides of the argument, the argument for the belief that the universe has a designer at work appears to be stronger than its criticisms. Both aspects of Paley's argument have evidence behind to support what he says. It is also possible to relate what Paley says to the things around us, for example a bird has wings for the purpose of flight and the regularity of the solar system. Hume gives good criticisms, but to say that the world has evolved with no designer does not give explanation for the beauty, regularity and purpose around us. The Design Argument Holly Devlin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Man and the Universe

    There is much criticism from the scientific community over this concept. Specified complexity does not have a wide application in other fields. It is flawed by the way it treats the different possible explanations, leaving it open for false conclusions.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Thus this leads many to reject God and even if he does exist, many argue that he is not worthy of our worship. The problem of evil is worse for the believers in the God of classical theism. Other religious outlooks could attribute the presence of evil to arguments amongst the Gods.

  1. Augustine believed that God is wholly good and made the world perfect

    This is why we have earthquakes and tsunamis. Even with all the sins we have committed, Augustine believes that God is graceful and sent Jesus to take the penalties of our sins, so that we may all go to heaven. The strength of this theory is that it is a good answer to the problem of evil, allowing

  2. Birth Of The Universe

    The Goddess has no desire to be the singular authority, to be the one and only God, who loves you and who will kill you if you don't believe it ... {laughter} ... who is all-powerful, but cannot seem to reach you if you slip the slightest bit so that you could be totally dominated and controlled by the Devil.

  1. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    Everything, it argues, requires a cause and to avoid infinite regress, there must be a first cause; however this first cause is something that has no cause. Therefore not everything requires a cause and the premise is invalid. Again, if there is a being which does not require a cause, why should this being not be the universe itself?

  2. "Design and the working out of an underlying purpose is evident in the world. ...

    Paley said, "Just as the discovery of a watch on a heath could not be satisfactorily explained by saying it had always been there. The order evident in the universe demands an explanation. The watch is an analogy for the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work