• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

Extracts from this document...


Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium Results Results of first procedure: 158cm3 of hydrogen gas collected Results of second procedure Try Amount of acid needed (cm3) 1 39.20 2 39.30 3 39.30 Average 39.27 Conclusion Balanced Equation = 2Li(s) + 2H2O(l) � 2LiOH(aq) + H2(g) *All results will be rounded up to three significant figures Method 1 Assume that 1 mole of gas occupies 24000cm3 at room temperature and pressure. Firstly, the number of moles of Hydrogen gas needs to be calculated. This is done by dividing the volume of hydrogen gas produced in the experiment (This would be 158cm3) by the volume of 1 mole of hydrogen gas (24000cm3): Number of moles of H2 gas = Volume of H2 (g)/Volume of 1 mole of H2 (g) 158cm3/24000cm3 = 0.0065833 The result of this calculation is = 0.00658 The mole ratio of Lithium to Hydrogen is worked out by the balanced equation of the experiment, as shown above. For every 1 mole of hydrogen, there is going to be 2 moles of Lithium: 2Li(s) + 2H2O(I) � 2LiOH(aq) + H2(g) Mole ratio Li : H 2 : 1 For every 1 mole of hydrogen, there must be 2 moles of Lithium. Therefore, we need to multiply the number of moles of H2 gas to make the number of lithium and hydrogen moles equal. To multiply the number of moles of hydrogen gas, we need to times the number of moles of hydrogen gas by two: 0.00658 x ...read more.


Overall, the accuracy of measurements made isn't very precise as the human eye was used. If the measurements were taken by looking down at the apparatus, up at the apparatus or meeting it at the middle of the eye, each measurement could be slightly different. This method is called parallax. To make sure that the lithium had all traces of oil removed, we had to wipe the piece of lithium with filter paper. This method could have increased inaccuracy of the experiment, as all traces of oil might not have been removed. We had no indication of this; therefore, again we had to use the human eye. As determined above, the human eye isn't very precise, as it cannot determine the accuracy, in this case, if all traces of oil were removed from the lithium sample. Another inaccuracy that could have taken place in the experiment is the collection of hydrogen. In the experiment, the stopper in the flask, which was filled with 100cm3 of distilled water, was removed, lithium was added and the stopper was replaced as quickly as possible. Hydrogen would have been lost, in the time taken form adding the sample of lithium to the flask with distilled water and replacing the bung. Therefore, the final volume of gas evolved in the measuring cylinder would not have been correct; therefore, the titration experiment (second experiment) would have also been wrong as the same solution was used for the second experiment. ...read more.


Also to record and make note of the temperature of the room as an indication of what atmospheric conditions, the experiments are carried out at. Other sources or errors observed in the experiment are as follows. Firstly a major limitation of the experiment was using a measuring cylinder. This proved inaccurate, as hydrogen gas might have entered the cylinder even before the experiment had started making the results inaccurate. An improvement for this inaccuracy is to use a measuring cylinder. A measuring cylinder has measurements on it and is more accurate as the inside bung pushes itself outwards to indicate that gas is being collected. Also, the amount of gas collected is easier to measure as there are units on the cylinder. For stability and accuracy purposes, the measuring cylinder would have to be held horizontally using a clamp stand. Secondly, using a delivery tube would have been inaccurate, as gas might have got stuck in it. Because the tube was bent at various places, e.g. when it entered the measuring cylinder, this would have an impact made on the volume of gas collected, as not all of the gas would have been collected. A glass tube would have been more accurate to use, along with a measuring cylinder as this would be kept straight, and the bends made in the tube would be manufactured rather than produced by the person carrying out the experiment. The overall experiment involves weighting, collection of hydrogen and titration. Within the context of this experiment, the titration is not a significant procedural error. Faizah M (c)2003 Pg. 1 of. 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Number of moles The mass of lithium used in 100cm3 is 0.05g. So, the relative atomic mass of lithium = 0.05g 7.468 x 10-3 = 6.6952 Conclusion: The relative atomic mass of lithium is 6.70 EVALUATION I feel that overall the results of my experiment were fairly accurate.

  2. to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium. We will be doing this via ...

    The limitations due to our procedure include the following: * Lack of purity of chemicals due to reaction with air and more specifically, Lithium metal reacting with air to form an Oxide surface. * The oil that the lithium is stored in will act as a barrier against the reaction.

  1. Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium

    When I was filling up my conical flask with 100cm3 I could have used less or more than exactly 100cm3, so the amount of water I was reacting with the Lithium could have been more or less than I thought, although I am sure I measured this very accurately so there should be little error there.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of Lithium

    24000 cm 0.042 6.462 0.0065 Average Titre - 77 cm 0.00321 0.00321 X 2 = 0.0065 24000 cm 0.043 6.154 0.0065 Part 2 LiOH (aq) + HCl (aq) LiCl (aq) + H2O (l) Equipment 25.00 cm Pipette Lithium Hydroxide Solution 250 cm Conical Flask Hydrochloric Acid Burette Phenolphthalein Indicator Standing Clamp Method 1.

  1. Determination of the Relative Atomic mass of Lithium

    Therefore since the Lithium and Hydrogen are in a 2 : 1 ratio, we simply multiply the moles of Hydrogen by 2. So 2 x 0.00229 mol = 0.00458 moles of Lithium. From this we can then work out the Relative Atomic Mass by using the equation : Moles = Mass / Mr.

  2. Determine the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    We can use the known concentration of the hydrochloric acid to work out the moles of hydrochloric acid used to neutralise the alkaline. This is the formula that is to be used The n represents the mole of the substance.

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    So I will not be using it in my average titre. Average titre = 18.67cm3 ( to 2 decimal places is sufficient accuracy) The chemical equation for this reaction is: LiOH(aq) + HCl(aq) � LiCl(aq) + H2O(l) The mole ratio of lithium hydroxide to hydrochloric acid is: 1:1 To find

  2. Investigation to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium

    The lithium was then placed in a pan balance once removing as much oil as possible. The measured mass of lithium was placed in a conical flask and the bung put in place to collect the H2 produced and so that no gas came out of the top.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work