• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Genetic Engineering has been regarded 'as a major breakthrough in the fight against disease' and will allow 'increased food production'. However, some people believe that scientists are in danger of 'creating a monster and should not meddle with nature'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jennifer James 12SM 'Genetic Engineering has been regarded 'as a major breakthrough in the fight against disease' and will allow 'increased food production'. However, some people believe that scientists are in danger of 'creating a monster and should not meddle with nature'. Genetic engineering is a new science. It has the potential to be used for good or bad, to change the planet irreversibly. The state of scientific knowledge in this area is growing day by day. This is the beginning of what must be an ongoing debate, if the public is to have confidence in the moral, ethical, scientific and commercial decisions that are taken with regard to genetic engineering. Moral values of a certain topic can vary between different people, and often leads to conflict. This has happened in the Genetically Modified (GM) foods debate. The definition of Genetically Modified foods from the EC novel foods regulation is "a food which is, or which is made from, a genetically modified organism... containing genetic material or protein resulting from the modification". "Ethical decisions involve weighing up risks against the benefits". The morals of an individual rely on their "feeling rather than facts" of a situation. ...read more.

Middle

Dr. Francis H. C. Crick, winner of the Nobel Prize in 1962 states "Humans probably will not be improved or altered by genetic manipulation in the future; education and environment are more important than genetics". Religious groups feel very strongly about GM foods. They want nature to run without human interference and also the feeling that you "shouldn't mess with what God designed, humans aren't the creator". For example, Hindus treat cows as sacred and to Jews and Muslims pigs are considered un-clean, so they would be unable to consume products from these organisms. There are two extreme views about GM crops. The positive view taken by the government and the GM companies, and the stronger negative view held by the media, the public and environmental awareness companies. The newspapers can now 'name and shame' test sites of GM crops. This could lead Greenpeace activists to destroy the sites like on 26th July 1999 when 28 people made a dawn raid on a 28-acre crop. Media can be partly to blame for the hype surrounding GM crops. This is because ethics rather than facts are emphasised as main points in many articles. ...read more.

Conclusion

I shall finish with a quote from Jack B. Bresler "Is the human body a sacred vessel of man's soul and spirit, or is he merely at that position in biological evolution to know that he is a part of evolution and can do something about his own future evolution?" Word Count 1, 083 words Biography * Keeping the balance; policies on genetic modification- Liberal Democrats * Tomorrow's Biodiversity- Vandana Shiva * Biopiracy: the plunder of nature and knowledge- Vandana Shiva * Genetically engineered organisms: benefits and risks- J.R.S. Fincham and J.R. Ravetz * Animal biotechnology and ethics- edited by Alan Holland and Andrew Johnson * Genetic revolution and human rights- Justine Burley * Ethics in biotechnology www.gre.ac.uk/ws02/GM_Gmfoods/ethnic.html * A Mirror newspaper headline adapted from 'Ethics in biotechnology'. www.gre.ac.uk/~ws02/GM_foods/ethnic.hmtl * Andrew Parker BBC online- GM foods, what people think, 8th October 1999. www.bbc.co.uk * 'GM food protests' Thursday September 21st 2000 - The Guardian newspaper. * 'Health implications of genetically modified foods' - Professor Liam Donaldson and Sir Robert May, May 1999 * 'A new introduction to biology' AQA - Bill Indge, Martin Rowland, Margaret Baker. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Variation and Inheritance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Variation and Inheritance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Research in Genetic Engineering Should Be Halted. Discuss

    3 star(s)

    is this the first step towards creating Hitler's master race through eugenics (i.e. preserving only genetically Ôsuperior' people)? What if tests show there is only a 50 percent possibility of contracting an incurable debilitating disease? What if the disease is not necessarily life-threatening, like cerebral pasly or multiple sclerosis?

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Cloning. Should it be banned? I will explain all the different types of cloning ...

    human cloning, however I was able to find this one report made by 3 scientific officers in California - On January, 2008, Wood and Andrew French, Stemagen's chief scientific officer in California, announced that they successfully created the first 5 mature human embryos using DNA from adult skin cells, aiming to provide a source of viable embryonic stem cells.

  1. Genetic Engineering, Friend or Foe?

    So this is the positive side of the argument, however, others do not feel the same - recently trail GM crops have been destroyed even in 'sleepy' Devon in a trails site at Dartington. Fears were raised even higher because an internationally acclaimed organic farm was nearby.

  2. The Ethics of Genetic Engineering

    These people are against any sort of specific label warnings as the GM crops should not be considered different.1 A second ethical issue in agricultural biotechnology are big corporate names attempting to encourage poor farmers in developing countries to grow GM crops.

  1. Pressure groups are important in the debate about Genetic modification. How would you define ...

    Another way in which Pressure groups promote their interests is by gathering and using high valued information as a resource for specialist knowledge thus using this to their advantage against opposing parties and decision makers .An example of this is , MIND and MENCAP , which are groups campaigning on behalf of people with mental disabilities and learning difficulties.

  2. Food Policy at a Crossroads, A World of Plenty or a World of Famine ...

    13 Even cereals with modified starch or protein content are being created for those seeking more nutritive value to their balanced breakfasts. Thirdly, this wave delivers enhanced levels of pharmaceutical and industrial products from plants, leading our industries to an entirely new business spectrum.

  1. The GM Food Debate.

    the support GM foods. Most groups seen on the internet are against GM foods and a number of reasons are given. Firstly, the problem is that GM foods cause problems to human health. Evidence showed that many children had developed life-threatening allergies after eating food in which a new gene had been introduced.

  2. Cloning Human Beings Is Not Ethical.

    Are we willing to agree in part to follow the road of scientific progress to the dehumanized hell of the future? This future could very well hold many genetically perfect humans, making us as real humans stand out as failures in need of refinement or replacement. What a scary thought!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work