• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigate a factor that influences the rate of decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide (solution) H2O2 (aq)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigate a factor that influences the rate of decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide (solution) H2O2 (aq) PLANNING Hypothesis The higher the temperature, the faster the rate of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Before I can look at factors that will affect the rate of decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2), I have to consider that on its own hydrogen peroxide' will not decompose to produce oxygen and water as a result at room temperature. Hydrogen peroxide --> oxygen + water 2H2O2 (aq) O2 (g) 2H2O2 (l) This equation shows the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. From doing my experiment I will be testing to see if either oxygen or water was present at the end. This will help me see if I concocted the experiment correctly. In order to speed up the reaction so that it is fast enough for me to be able to measure the rate of decomposition at room temperature in a given time, a catalyst will be added. This catalyst is called Manganese(IV) oxide. This catalyst is a substance which will speed up the decomposition of H2O2. However, the catalyst itself does not take part in the reaction, and is not used up; therefore after the reaction has taken place the same amount of catalyst that was added will remain. The catalyst works by providing a convenient surface for the reaction to occur. This then means that the particles collide more frequently with each other and so more collisions results in more bonds breaking which leads to a reaction between particles. ...read more.

Middle

5 20 25 0.5 33 5 40 25 0.5 43 5 Not completed 25 0.5 53 5 91 From this second set of preliminary experiments I found out the right amounts that I wanted to use, which are now stated in the method that I used. List of apparatus I am going to use * 250cm� of Hydrogen peroxide * 5g of Manganese(IV) oxide * 5 boiling tubes + rack * 5 weighing boats * Gas syringe + clamp and stand * Bunsen burner * Thermometer * Stopwatch Method * I am going to first set up my gas syringe by clamping it, because it will be a lot easier to place the bung on after adding the manganese(IV) oxide. * I am then going to measure out 25cm� of hydrogen peroxide into 5 boiling tubes each, and set them in a rack. * I will then measure out 0.5g of manganese(IV) oxide into five weighing boats, one to add to each test tube of solution. * I will then light my Bunsen burner and collect a stopwatch. * I will then take a thermometer and record the room temperature of the solution. I will add in the manganese (IV) oxide and place the bung from the gas syringe on and start the stop watch. Whilst this is going on I will shake the contents of the boiling tube, as the reaction will only occur on the surface. This would produce unreliable results, as not a lot of gas may be given off and so the catalyst needs to work with all the hydrogen peroxide, for this to work fairly. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, after heating it to 25�c, it rose up to 27�c, and this is why my temperatures do not match exactly but are close. This also shows that my fair testing did not come into practice too well. As to have made it fairer I should have done both sets of experiments on the same day. The largest error made was between the last two plots on the graph. At 42�c 50cm� of gas was collected, whereas on the second day at 39�c 55�c of gas was collected. Again this is due to the faults I stated about that could not be avoided. The graph that shows the average set of results shows that the plots lie directly on the curve of best fit. This shows that despite the minor errors made between the two experiments, the average shows a reliable set of results, which erases all the anomalous results shown before. Taking into consideration that the method did produce a reliable set of averaged out results, to make this experiment more reliable in the future I can: * Do all sets of experiments on the same day, to improve my chances of gaining fairer results * The time between adding in the manganese(IV) oxide and placing the bung on top could be reduced by having both sets of apparatus closer together. * I could have done more temperatures, some higher than the one I stopped at and maybe even some lower to get more sets of results. This may prevent anomalous results happening and give a more precise average. Also this could support my scientific background to larger extent. Nana Agyeman. 11V Ms Yates ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Patterns of Behaviour section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Patterns of Behaviour essays

  1. Factors Affecting the Rate of Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide.

    Mass of catalyst: This was started at 1g (using middle of the concentration range of H202 - 10 Vol.), but the reaction occurred far too quickly and so did not give enough spread for a graph to be plotted. Therefore, the same experiment was attempted with 0.5g, and the results were similar.

  2. Investigate the factors, which affect the rate of decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide.

    The amount of gas that I was collecting was also consistently 50cm3. All these factors needed to be kept constant because otherwise they would affect the experiment and it wouldn't be a fair test, which is essential to produce reliable results.

  1. To find out the effect of varying concentration of potassium iodide in a I2 ...

    From the graph, we can find out the half-life of the substance. The two half-life values obtained from the graph for t1 and t2 are approximately: - t1 = 13.97 seconds - t2 = 12.63 seconds Thus it can be concluded that the I2/H2O2 reaction is a first order reaction.

  2. Investigation of the effect of the concentration of hydrogen peroxide on the rate of ...

    Concentration of Hydrogen Peroxide Displacement of air Volume of Oxygen produced In 10secs (1) Displacement of air Volume of Oxygen produced In 1'secs (2) 1M 3 53 3 42 0.9M 4 45 3 35 0.8M 3 44 3 28 0.7M 3 29 3 22 0.6M 2 23 2 18 0.5M

  1. Studying the rate of reaction of the catalyst decomposition of hydrogen peroxide.

    my graph I can see that the whole experiment went very well and that there were no anomalies. I was also able to spot a trend, which was the higher the concentration the quicker the reaction will happen. This was what I predicted in my prediction.

  2. To determine the rate law for a chemical reaction among hydrogen peroxide, iodide and ...

    This prevented any readily apparent reaction of equation (III). However, after all the thiosulfate ions had been consumed by the reaction of equation (II), triiodide ions reacted with starch to form the blue starch-pentaiodide complex. By varying the concentration of each of the three reactants (H2O2, I- and H+), we will be able to determine the order of the

  1. The Effect of Catalase in the Breakdown of Hydrogen Peroxide

    This time limit will be constant. When recording this vital data, the time limit (every two minutes) is very important to watch over. This is because if the time limit is extended it allows more oxygen particles to be released, therefore; the end results would be inaccurate and unfair.

  2. To Investigate the Effect of Manganese IV Oxide on the rate of decomposition of ...

    The variables marked with an asterisk (*) will be measured: * Amount of oxygen produced. * Time taken to produce oxygen. * * Appearance of decomposition. Rory Good Method Apparatus Safety Whilst this experiment is relatively safe, there are still safety considerations that must be adhered to: * Due to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work