• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating cratering on the moon.

Extracts from this document...


Nicky Outram 10x/s

Investigating cratering on the moon


I am planning to investigate factors that affect the diameter and depth of a crater formed when a meteorite strikes the moons surface. The moon is covered with a powdered crust. When meteorites strike the surface we obtain impact craters. To simulate this without actually going to the moon I shall drop a ball bearing into a tray of dry sand.


Variables that might affect the outcome of this experiment:

  • Height (The higher up, the more speed the bearing will pick up)
  • Size of bearing (This will determine how much sand will collide with the bearing as it falls)
  • Mass of Bearing (The heavier, the faster and with more force the ball will fall)
  • Depth of the sand (If too shallow some craters may not properly form as they might hit the base of the tray)
  • Velocity (this will depend on the mass and height)
  • Flat sand surface (Must be smooth and same depth for fair test)
  • Type of sand (If too dense or big particles the bearing may not displace as much)
  • Angle of impact from the bearing (This would affect the width and depth of crater as the bearing would go in at an angle so the ball won’t have to balance force with the compression of sand underneath)

I will take 10 results (100mm through to 1000mm) and then do them again in total of 3 times and then take the average of the 3 tests to give a wide and reliable range.

I am going to change the height from bearing and the surface of the sand. I will try and keep the other variables the same during the experiment (this is to keep it a fair test). I am going to use the same bearing so the size + mass will stay the same; I am going to drop the bearing from the same angle (horizontally) and will try to keep the surface of the sand as even as possible because if the bearing hit a small stone in the sand it would cause more friction and an upward force due to the larger surface area of the stone compared to a grain of sand.

To make this a fair test I will:

  • Try to get the surface of the sand as smooth and same depth as posible
  • Use a clamp to keep accurate heights.
  • Use all of the same equipment each time I use it, including the same bearing so there will be no size or weight differences.


  • Tray (for the sand)
  • Ruler (1 meter)
  • Ball bearing (15mm diameter, 15.5g)
  • Clamp (1 meter tall), boss + clamp
  • Sand (fine sand)
  • Magnet
  • Vernier Calliper

How to do the test…

  • Fill a the tray about half full with sand.
  • Set up the apparatus like so:


  • Drop the bearing from the clamp at a height of 200 – 1000mm (in 100mm steps)
  • Use a magnet to lift the bearing out from the crater.
  • Record the dimensions of the crater with the Vernier Calliper.
  • Record the results
  • Fill the hole and smooth the surface ready for the next test.
  • Do the hole experiment two more times
...read more.


Height from bottom of the ball to sand surface

Diameter (mm)
























































...read more.


Use finer sand which would make the test fairer because the bearing will not deflect off any stones or larger particles in the sand. Somehow take the measurements better and more accurate, a vernier calliper is the best thing I could think of which is accurate but is easily wrong by a few millimetres.Take my experiment further by using a table tennis ball with a small hole in the side to change the mass of the ball without changing the shape or air resistance of the ball.Look at different velocity and see how that might affect the outcome. This could be achieved by either launching the ball from a catapult of some sort or dropping the ball from a much higher point.Try different type of sands (or soil, fine gravel, etc) maybe a fine sand would have a different result than coarse sand. Because maybe the cosmic dust covering the moon isn’t of the same texture.

The experiment was a success in one way, that I learnt by my mistakes. But my results did not match up with my prediction so in that sense it was a failure. I don’t think I took enough results, more results could have been taken to make a wider and more reliable range but that would of need more time.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Investigate the size of craters in sand when a marble is dropped into the ...

    Conclusion From my results I have found some good trends. The higher the height from which a marble is dropped into sand the larger the area of the crater made is. I have also found from my preliminary results that at a certain height the area of the crater stays the same.

  2. Investigating Impact Craters

    The ball could then be filled with plasticine and reassembled with very thin sticky tape, so as not to alter the shape of the ball. The ball was dropped from an ample height of 35cm with 4 different masses. Each mass was dropped 5 times and an average taken for the crater diameter and depth (to the nearest millimetre).

  1. Investigate a factor that might affect the size of a crater made by a ...

    Another limitation noticed was the weight of the object that had to be used, it is possible that a lighter weight object would reach its terminal velocity quicker due to the fact the PE is also proportional to the weight meaning less would go to KE and the energy transfer

  2. This investigation is associated with the bounce of a squash ball. I will be ...

    Drop Height One of the aspects I needed to investigate in my pre-testing was the height that I dropped the ball from, as this will need to be kept constant to keep the investigation fair. Below is a table of results to show how high the ball bounced when dropped from different heights the temperature was 26oC.

  1. Approximate Stopping Distances

    The braking distance will also be affected and will depend on the following: * The condition of the brakes * How good the brakes are * How well the tyres grip onto the road, this can depend on the weather * The road surface * The condition of the car

  2. To investigate the height dropped from a crater and the affect in the size ...

    There was only one anomalous result which was not too out of line which shows the accuracy of the investigation was consistent though not completely. I feel that the procedure was suitable although there are quite a few ways in which the method could be improved.

  1. How does the drop height of a small and a large marble affect the ...

    So the height increased as the diameter of the crater increased. The terminal velocity was not reached as the diameter did not stay constant at any point. The reason that the size of the crater was slowly was that the motion (speed)

  2. Bouncing Ball Experiment

    this it can be seen that using the average of the middle three results is more accurate than using the average of all five, as it automatically discounts most anomalies. For instance result 3 from 200cm was an anomaly but was not taken into account when taking the average of the middle three.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work