• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating cratering on the moon.

Extracts from this document...


Nicky Outram 10x/s

Investigating cratering on the moon


I am planning to investigate factors that affect the diameter and depth of a crater formed when a meteorite strikes the moons surface. The moon is covered with a powdered crust. When meteorites strike the surface we obtain impact craters. To simulate this without actually going to the moon I shall drop a ball bearing into a tray of dry sand.


Variables that might affect the outcome of this experiment:

  • Height (The higher up, the more speed the bearing will pick up)
  • Size of bearing (This will determine how much sand will collide with the bearing as it falls)
  • Mass of Bearing (The heavier, the faster and with more force the ball will fall)
  • Depth of the sand (If too shallow some craters may not properly form as they might hit the base of the tray)
  • Velocity (this will depend on the mass and height)
  • Flat sand surface (Must be smooth and same depth for fair test)
  • Type of sand (If too dense or big particles the bearing may not displace as much)
  • Angle of impact from the bearing (This would affect the width and depth of crater as the bearing would go in at an angle so the ball won’t have to balance force with the compression of sand underneath)

I will take 10 results (100mm through to 1000mm) and then do them again in total of 3 times and then take the average of the 3 tests to give a wide and reliable range.

I am going to change the height from bearing and the surface of the sand. I will try and keep the other variables the same during the experiment (this is to keep it a fair test). I am going to use the same bearing so the size + mass will stay the same; I am going to drop the bearing from the same angle (horizontally) and will try to keep the surface of the sand as even as possible because if the bearing hit a small stone in the sand it would cause more friction and an upward force due to the larger surface area of the stone compared to a grain of sand.

To make this a fair test I will:

  • Try to get the surface of the sand as smooth and same depth as posible
  • Use a clamp to keep accurate heights.
  • Use all of the same equipment each time I use it, including the same bearing so there will be no size or weight differences.


  • Tray (for the sand)
  • Ruler (1 meter)
  • Ball bearing (15mm diameter, 15.5g)
  • Clamp (1 meter tall), boss + clamp
  • Sand (fine sand)
  • Magnet
  • Vernier Calliper

How to do the test…

  • Fill a the tray about half full with sand.
  • Set up the apparatus like so:


  • Drop the bearing from the clamp at a height of 200 – 1000mm (in 100mm steps)
  • Use a magnet to lift the bearing out from the crater.
  • Record the dimensions of the crater with the Vernier Calliper.
  • Record the results
  • Fill the hole and smooth the surface ready for the next test.
  • Do the hole experiment two more times
...read more.


Height from bottom of the ball to sand surface

Diameter (mm)
























































...read more.


Use finer sand which would make the test fairer because the bearing will not deflect off any stones or larger particles in the sand. Somehow take the measurements better and more accurate, a vernier calliper is the best thing I could think of which is accurate but is easily wrong by a few millimetres.Take my experiment further by using a table tennis ball with a small hole in the side to change the mass of the ball without changing the shape or air resistance of the ball.Look at different velocity and see how that might affect the outcome. This could be achieved by either launching the ball from a catapult of some sort or dropping the ball from a much higher point.Try different type of sands (or soil, fine gravel, etc) maybe a fine sand would have a different result than coarse sand. Because maybe the cosmic dust covering the moon isn’t of the same texture.

The experiment was a success in one way, that I learnt by my mistakes. But my results did not match up with my prediction so in that sense it was a failure. I don’t think I took enough results, more results could have been taken to make a wider and more reliable range but that would of need more time.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Investigate the size of craters in sand when a marble is dropped into the ...

    Conclusion From my results I have found some good trends. The higher the height from which a marble is dropped into sand the larger the area of the crater made is. I have also found from my preliminary results that at a certain height the area of the crater stays the same.

  2. To investigate the height dropped from a crater and the affect in the size ...

    A wider range of readings could be taken with a more exact reading using two decimal places or the experiment could be repeated more times for a better average. Quality of the evidence: Individual results were measured more accurately using a calibrating stick It was useful as it obtained readings

  1. Investigating Impact Craters

    For this experiment, a special ball needed to be devised. It needed to be able to alter its mass, but keep its diameter the same. Short of painstakingly finding identically sized balls of exact masses, the best option was to cut a table tennis ball in half.

  2. How does the drop height of a small and a large marble affect the ...

    I know this because the graph I drew in my prediction is exactly the same shape as my final results graph. The graph shows that as the height of the drop increases the diameter increases, but the two are not directly proportional.

  1. This investigation is associated with the bounce of a squash ball. I will be ...

    Their diameter, measured perpendicular to the seam, must be between 39.5mm and 40.5mm, and their weight between 23 and 25g. To be measured for stiffness the balls are held between two plates with the seam parallel to the plates and compressed at a rate of 45-55mm per minute.

  2. Investigating the amazingness of theBouncing Ball!

    If the ball has a low decay constant at a certain temperature it doesn't necessarily mean that the coefficient of restitutuin will be low at that temperature. This is true because the decay constant looks at height, which looks at gravity and so is a measure of energy (considering G.P.E.= mgh).

  1. Mechanical Properties of a Meter Rule

    also increased, but not in a proportional way, just like in the wood. The reason it curved was just like the reason the wood curved, this was because the bonds were reaching its elastic limit. The bonds in the wooden rule started to reach their elastic limit at about 0.75m,

  2. Producing craters.

    Leaving a larger hole than expected. By analyzing the graphs it is clear that the flour has a clear peak at about 50 to 70 Centimetres. Whereas the semolina has a gradual increase. After 70 Centimetres the flour drops at 80 but that could be a irregularity The flour then levels out at 100.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work