• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The GM Food Debate

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The GM Food Debate As a nation, we are currently undergoing a crucial and constant debate on the whether or not we should be using genetically-modified, or GM crops. This is not an argument against unnatural farming-what we call 'conventional farming' is not in itself, a natural process. The crops grown today are very different from their wild ancestors. Most UK crops originated in distant parts of the world. Since early times, average yields have increased massively. Early in the 20th century the UK wheat yield was around 2 tonnes per hectare; now it is typically over 7 tonnes per hectare. This is due to the use of fertilisers, insecticides, fungicides and herbicides, as well as the expertise of seed breeders. At the same time, however, there has bee a reduction in the number and diversity of the wildlife. In the last 30 years, 24 of the 40 bird species which breed on farmland have declined. ...read more.

Middle

GM maize protects itself against the corn borer and usually only one application of insecticide is needed to control other pests. Making crops resistant to insects and diseases and reducing weeds should lead to fewer crop losses. For example, worldwide 7% of the annual maize harvest is destroyed by the European corn borer, up to 20% in some areas. If Bt maize delivers its promise, maize yields in Europe and the US together could increase by 7-10 million tonnes. Fewer chemicals are used on herbicide tolerant and insect resistant GM crops. This in turn brings savings in the energy which would have been used to produce and transport those chemicals. There are potential energy savings on the farm too; the use of tractor diesel is reduced as fewer sprayings means fewer trips across the fields. More efficient processing saves energy. The GM tomato grown in the US stays firmer for longer which means less is lost during processing. ...read more.

Conclusion

The concern with GM crops is that increased use of a single herbicide on successive crops will lead to more weeds becoming resistant. Similarly, insects will develop resistant to toxins such as the Bt protein. There is also the chance that genes from GM crops may be accidentally transferred to non-GM crops. The chances of this are increased if the two crops are grown adjacent to each other. 'Organic' crops will lose their status if they do not remain completely free of all GM genes. People are becoming increasingly concerned that man's interaction with the environment has led to a reduction in the diversity of our flora and fauna. Some believe that GM technology could lead to a loss of biodiversity. In some countries, single crops are grown over a very wide area. These mono-cultures threaten biodiversity. The less successful crops are not grown so that available varieties are reduced. This also leads to a loss of the flora and fauna which thrives on them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Variation and Inheritance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Variation and Inheritance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluating the risks and benefits of GM crops.

    4 star(s)

    need to purchase both the herbicide and the herbicide resistant crop from them. Anti GM protester are also disgusted with the "guilt" tactics used by the biotechnology companies and GM sympathisers to change consumer opinions. These organisations claim their products could save the developing countries inhabitants by ending world hunger by them just purchasing their goods.

  2. Analysis of Charles Darwin's Origin of the Species

    A parent does not pass its genetic information and its beneficial variance to only one of its progeny; it passes it to all of them. There fore if it is beneficial to the community of ants to pass along the variation of producing sterile creatures than there is no reason that it should not be.

  1. GM Crops- Should they be grown?

    The socioeconomic advantages of the genetic modification of crops include tackling poverty and starvation in the third world, whilst overcoming the issue of a rising global population that is estimated to reach nine billion by 2050. By which time 'cereal crops will have to yield 1.5% more food annually and on a diminished supply of cultivated land'3.

  2. Should GM crops be grown?

    This doesn't apply to us in Britain, the farmers here know that our seasons are long enough to get well grown crops to supply the country. The first genetically modified crops to be sold in the USA were tomatoes, which were modified so they wouldn't go soft so quickly, then Soya beans and oilseed rape, which gives margarine and oils.

  1. Pressure groups are important in the debate about Genetic modification. How would you define ...

    The quality of the decision making process is therefore improved thus reducing the level of rejection by opposing parties. Genetically modified foods, are food products made from genetically modified organisms, which belong to a category of crops (GM crops)(ww.aber.ac.uk) Genetically modified (GM)

  2. Food Policy at a Crossroads, A World of Plenty or a World of Famine ...

    Currently the world is looking at two competing approaches to solve the problem; GMFs or Organic Farming. Proponents on either side have been rigorously arguing that their approach is right. We will present pros and cons for both sides and finally try to analyze which approach will make more sense to follow.

  1. The GM Food Debate.

    In their letter, they asked that the World Food Programme withdraw its position of pressuring food-receiving countries to accept GM food and that they should return stocks of GM food to the donor countries and instead urge them to substitute non-GM food for the GM food already given.

  2. The first available GM food was on themarket in 1994, it was a tomato ...

    I think the source above is a valid argument towards GM food, I think this because she is the Chief Research scientist at CSIRO Plant Industry, this company researches ways into solving problems in developing countries, and she is in favour of using GM food.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work