• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium. We will be doing this via two methods:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The aim of this experiment is to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium. We will be doing this via two methods: * The first method will be to collect the gas evolved when lithium is reacted with distilled water and consequently calculate the relative atomic mass. * The second method will be to calculate the relative atomic mass through titration with Hydrochloric Acid (HCl). Method 1 Results: Mass of lithium (g) 0.099 Volume of hydrogen produced (cm3) 178 The volume of hydrogen collected from the reaction of 0.099 grams of lithium with 100.0cm3 of distilled water was 178 cm3. Treatment of results: We assume that 1 mole of gas occupies 24000 cm3 at room temperature and pressure. The chemical equation for this reaction is: 2Li(s) + 2H2O(l) --> 2LiOH(aq) + H2(g) We must firstly calculate the number of moles of Hydrogen produced using the following equation: Moles of gas = Volume (in cm3) 24 000 Therefore, Moles of hydrogen = 178 = 7.4167 x 10-3 moles 24 000 According to the mole ratio in our chemical equation, there are twice as many moles of lithium than hydrogen present. ...read more.

Middle

Improving techniques, making multiple measurements or using instruments with a higher degree of precision can reduce them. An example of this is a reading error which is an error due to guesswork involved in taking a reading from a scale when the reading lies between the scale divisions. Such as reading on the measuring cylinder when between 26 cm3 and 27 cm3, best estimate of the next figure is half a division to give reading of 26.5 cm3. * Systematic errors result in readings, which are all too high, or all too low. They can be reduced or totally eliminated by the use of better technique and instruments and this increases the accuracy of the final result. An example of a systematic error is a reading error which occurs when the eye is not placed directly perpendicular and opposite a scale when a reading is being taken. This relates to the meniscus which formed a concave shape. The meniscus is brought about because of adhesion. To avoid the reading errors, readings of liquid levels must be taken with the eye lined up with the bottom of the meniscus, when it is a concave shape. ...read more.

Conclusion

The value that was recorded alongside the absolute value was 10.0 � 0.04 cm3 which means using the formula mentioned above, we reach a percentage error as below to 3 s.f.: Percentage error = 0.04 x 100 = 0.4% 10 As can be seen, the greatest percentage error is clearly with the measurement of the volume of HCl used (3.38%). To lower this percentage error and consequently improve the accuracy of our results, a larger volume of HCl would need to be used to neutralise the LiOH so therefore a larger amount of LiOH would be need to used. Not only would this decrease the percentage error in the volume of HCl used but will also lower the percentage error in the volume of LiOH used seeing as a larger measurement of LiOH would need to be used. The mass of the lithium contributes the second largest percentage error (1.01%), this can also be lowered by using a larger amount of substance, in this case lithium, which would result in a lower percentage error and a more accurate result. ?? ?? ?? ?? AS - Assessed Practical (Skills I, A and E) - Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium 23rd March 06 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of magnesium.

Another factor that may have caused the anomaly is error in measurement. This could be a misjudgement through human error for example; an error in misjudging the water mark in a burette or measuring cylinder could cause slight inaccuracy. The measuring devices that I used are all fairly accurate, the

2. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

and making it up to a 100cm3 solution by adding Sulphuric Acid (aq). [Potassium Manganate (VII) (aq)] = 0.025 mol dm-3 5 cm3 spinach extract solution and 25 cm3 Sulphuric Acid Spinach extract solution heated to 70oc before titration Start (cm3)

1. Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Calcium

It is not physically possible to put the bung on instantly after the calcium is added to the water. Therefore in this short time period between the addition of calcium and the bung being put on, a certain amount of gas would escape into the atmosphere and not into the measuring cylinder.

2. Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium

any results above 8.23 or below 6.17. The new mean of the data excluding the anomalous results is 7.11. This is more accurate than the previous mean. The new standard deviation is 0.19. This shows that the data is spread much less once the anomalous results have been omitted.

1. Investigate how the amount of heat produced by burning a fuel depends on the ...

Having decided above to use 100.0 cm3 of water in the can, I thus conducted my experiment, using three spread-out masses of ethanol (1g, 2g and 3g). I have demonstrated these results in the table below: Mass of Ethanol (g) Initial Mass Crucible (g) Final Mass Crucible (g) Initial Temp.

2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

I can test the accuracy by calculating the percentage of accuracy for each experiment. This is done by dividing the calculated result of the relative atomic mass by the actual atomic mass (6.9) of lithium, then multiplying this by 100: Method 1: 6.64 x 100 = 96.2 % accurate 6.9

1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

0.005 � 0.09 � 100 = 5.5% error on the measuring pipette 5) 0.005 � 10 � 100 = 0.5% error on the measuring pipette 1.29 + 1 + 0.34 + 5.5 + 0.5 = 8.63% The calculated overall error is 8.63% and the actual main error is the measuring balance which has an error of 5.5%.

2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

0.13 0 224 Evaluation (method 1):) In this experiment, I believe that there could have been many errors. The main sources of error in my opinion must be human and equipment error. For example a source of error is in measuring the amounts of the substances or materials. • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 