• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Formula of a Hydrate Lab. By performing this lab, we will be able to find the molar amount of water in the compounds magnesium sulfate and copper sulfate.

Extracts from this document...


Patty Lopez Hacker 6th Period Formula of a Hydrate Lab Lab Members: Patty Lopez, Gaby Calderon, Magali Garcia Dates the lab was performed: November 4th and 5th Purpose: * By performing this lab, we will be able to find the molar amount of water in the compounds magnesium sulfate and copper sulfate. By heating the compound, the heat will evaporate the waters of hydration, which will allow us to find the formula of the unknown hydrated salts. Hypothesis: * If we heat the hydrated salts, then the hydrates will evaporate and we will be able to find the formula of the hydrated salts. Materials: * 1 ring stand * 1 ring * Crucible tongs * Crucible and cover * Clay triangle * Small dropper * Bunsen burner * Matches * Lab balance * Watch glass * ~1g. ...read more.


7. Cool and determine the mass of the crucible, cover and its contents. 8. This last mass should agree with the previous mass within plus or minus0.01 grams. Note: if it does not, repeat this heating until a constant mass is reached. This is called heating a constant mass and is the only way of insuring that the reaction is complete and all the waters of hydration have been driven off (dehydrated). Do not heat the crucible to red hot, or the salt's sulfate portion will start to break down. This will give you yellowish contents. If this happens, you have to start over! Results: Copper Sulfate Mass Observations Crucible, cover and paper clip 17.8g. Crucible, cover, paper clip, and hydrated salt 19.8g. ...read more.


of MgSO4 1.0g.H2O x 1 mol =.056 mol H2O 18.0g. 1.0g. MgSO4 x 1mol = .0083 mol MgSO4 120.4g. .056 = 7 .0083 .0083 =1 .0083 Formula: MgSO4 x 7H2O Conclusion: In the Formula of a Hydrate Lab, our hypothesis was correct. When we heated the hydrated salts, the hydrates evaporated and we were able to find the formula of the salts. When we heated the compounds, we got a formula of CuSO4 x 6H2O for the copper sulfate, and MgSO4 x 7H2O for the magnesium sulfate. Our copper sulfate formula was very close to the answer of CuSO4 x 5H2O, but by heating the hydrate for another minute, or removing the crucible cover for a minute longer, we would have achieved that number by allowing the hydrate to evaporate the other waters of hydration. Although we don't know the correct answer for the magnesium sulfate, MgSO4 x 7H2O was our best guess. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Experiment - The Empirical Formula of Magnesium Oxide

    From both Table 3.1 and Graph 1, it can be seen that the absolute uncertainties of the mass and the number of moles of oxygen were extremely large, indicating the unreliability of the experiment results. Comparing to Graph 1, the correlation coefficient in Graph 2 improved after the outlier point

  2. Titration Lab

    Method For Data Collection 1. I have weighed out exactly 2.5 grams of AR ammonium iron (II) sulphate crystals, and dissolved them in approximately 40cm� of sulphuric acid solution with a concentration of approximately 1 mol dm-�. 2. I did NOT heat the solution to assist the dissolving of the solution.

  1. Aspirin Tablets Lab

    The value found was 81%. The calculated value is very similar to the percentage calculated using the masses of acetylsalicylic acid (500mg = 0.5g) and Aspirin tablet (0.6g) provided by the manufacturer [2]: The percentage difference between the two values is Sources of Error - The main source of error

  2. Lab #2 Water Hydration of Copper(II) Sulfate. Purpose- To determine the formula of ...

    After it has finished cooling place it on the balance and record the mass. 10) Place the crucible back onto the clay triangle and heat again for five minutes. 11) Remove the crucible with tongs and let it cool for two minutes.

  1. Butane Molar Mass Lab

    the top end of the beaker because the beaker was turned upside-down PROCESSING RAW DATA - Change of Mass of Lighter (g +/-0.01g) Pressure of Butane (atm +/- 0.02 atm) Displaced water (mL +/- 0.1mL) Molar Mass of Butane Trial 1 0.030 0.976 13.4 ~55.65 g/mol Trial 2 0.040 0.976

  2. Molar Heat combustion chemistry - investigate the effect of molar mass on the molar ...

    Convert all masses to kg 2. Use the equation, 3. Use error propagation to calculate uncertainties (adding the percentage errors) 4. Change back to absolute errors and round to 1 significant figure E.g. (values from methanol trial 1): ) Table 5. Heat of combustion Alcohol Trial Number Heat of combustion (J) Uncertainty of Heat Combustion (J)

  1. PURPOSE To determine the amount of water of crystallization in one mole of a ...

    = 1.4 / 18 =0.08 Moles of CuSO4 = mass / Mr = 2.6 / 159.62 = 0.016 Moles of hydration = moles (water) / moles (CuSO4) = 0.08 / 0.016 = 5 1. Percentage composition of water Molar mass (CuSO4.5H2O)

  2. Electrolysis of copper sulphate

    Comparison of results The graph above displays both the theoretically calculated mass and the experimentally obtained mass results in respect to current. From this comparison, it can be seen that the results obtained in the experiment are poorly correlated to, and show neither accuracy nor precision to the theoretical mass data.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work