• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Polarity of a Compound. We also determined that Water (H2O), is the most polar of all our tested compounds. To explain why it`s polar is simple; it has it`s hydrogen bonds (which cause it to be very polar) and the fact that it is in a isosceles triang

Extracts from this document...


The Polarity of a Compound Conclusion: To start, a non-polar molecule is simply when it is symmetrical (linear, cyclo,etc) in evry way and so, no matter the charge, the molecule can balance it`s charges out at he poles. A polar charge is merely the opposite, where it is unbalanced due to non symmetrical (triganol, etc) have a polar compound is to have a molecule that has an un-even charge therefore a more heavy attraction on one side of the molecule. We also determined that Water (H2O), is the most polar of all our tested compounds. To explain why it`s polar is simple; it has it`s hydrogen bonds (which cause it to be very polar) and the fact that it is in a isosceles triangle formation means that it is not symmetrical thus it is polar because of an uneven distribusuion of elctro-negativity of the hydrogen on either side. Now how to exlain that it is the most polar of the elements tested is because it has the largest uneven distribution of charge. The second most polar of our compounds was propone and thus had the second highest force of attraction towards positive charge of the rod. The only disquishing factor that ould affect this in propone is the fact that it contains double bonds. ...read more.


So, simply put; because maethanol is has smaller gravitational pull et ass than ethanol, it is thus displaced much easier by the polarity of the pole than the latter. Evaluation: To start, our group did most things correctly but merely in a different way. For example when our group measured the degree of deflection caused by the ostivily charged rod, we measured it close to the exit stream of the pepitte for each of the compounds instead of further down on the beaker. This was not nesserally incorrect procedure considering that we had used the same location of measurement for all tested compound, but, it did make it slightly harder for our group to judge what the precise degree of delectation was. This could be simply changed for the next test by recording our results from lower down the stream. One of the largest mistakes our group did though was that we did not retest our degree of deflection tests numerous times. We only would record the degrees once and then leave it alone. We had only one test and one result for each compound tested. Our method could have allowed some very false results to be recorded. To improve the accura cy of our results for next would be to retest each compound`s degree of deflection test 3 to 5 times in order to average it in the end. ...read more.


In regards to the charged ruler, here existed another flaw in the results. The biggest problem with the ruler is that there was no way to tell how charged the ruler was. To charge the ruler we would remove electrons by rubbing the ruler with a woolen cloth. The obvious problem was that we did not have a controlled time set to charge the stick. So when testing the polarity of set substances some tests were using a less polarized rod, which could have if it occurred greatly, changed the results. For next time our group should set a controlled time of 45 seconds so it's enough to fully polarize the rod but, also short enough so that we can repeat the tests for each substance without any time concerns. And yet another flaw occurs when we measured the deflection of the substances with a protractor, which was held at random distances away from the stream. Although it doesn't in any way affect our degree of deflection it did though, make it harder for me the degree reader to read the correct degrees. To add on to this problem we also did not hold our protractor straight and we often recorded the degrees of deflection with a shaky hand. What we could have done is lock the protractor in clamps and put it in a certain location throughout the entirety of the experiment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. testing liquis for polarity

    Propanone 2 cm of deflection This molecule shows as very weak polarity because the only way of this molecule being polar is the double bonded Oxygen-Carbon bond. Oxygen is more electronegative than carbon which gives as a result a very weakly charged dipole.

  2. Dissolved Oxygen in water

    Step 1: 2Mn2+ + O2 + 4OH- -->2MnO(OH)2 Step 2: MnO(OH)2 + 2I- + 4H- --> Mn2+ + I2 + 3H2O Step 3: I2 + 2S2O32- --> 2I- + S4O62- Variables: Independent variable: The independent variable in the experiment is the different water samples that we are taking i.e.

  1. liquids polarity

    attraction towards the high negative charged O; but the other O is placed besides the same C atom which will also exert an negative charge and a big attraction on C. Other carbons will have a high force between the single bond O, while the left hydrocarbons will share with both Oxygen; and here we'll found two different charges (+,-)

  2. Atomic Structure Notes

    e.g the first ionisation energy of sodium is the energy to complete the following reaction for one mole of sodium atoms. Na(g) --> Na+(g) + e- Subsequent ionisation energies describe the removal of one mole of electrons from positive ions, e.g: second ionisation energy Na+(g)

  1. Aim: To investigate the chemical properties of the halogens and some of their ...

    States State (s, l, g):liquid Melting point:277 K (-7 oC) Boiling point:332 K (58.9 oC) Energies Specific heat capacity:0.473 J g-1 K-1 Heat of atomization:112 kJ mol-1 Heat of fusion:10.57 kJ mol-1 of Br2 Heat of vaporization:29.96 kJ mol-1 of Br2 1st ionization energy:1139.9 kJ mol-1 2nd ionization energy:2103.4 kJ

  2. Factors Affecting Angle of Deflection

    which has a dipole. These dipoles will interact with the charged rod and depending on the dipole and charge on rod the liquid will be either pulled closer to the rod or pushed away. Hypothesis: The amount that the liquid is deflected will be directly proportional to the square of the distance between the

  1. The chemistry of atmospheric and water pollution.

    The Kyoto Protocol in 1997 required all halon production to cease by 2010 as well as setting a 5% reduction target in emissions by developed countries in 2012. This has reduced halon emissions but some major countries including USA have not ratified it thus reducing the effectiveness of Kyoto Protocol.

  2. Testing the Suitability of Pool Water. The expected amount of chlorine which is ...

    cm3 Final Burette Reading (� 0.05) cm3 Volume of Na2S2O3 (� 0.10) cm3 1 50 0 1.5 1.5 2 0 1.7 1.7 3 100 0 3.1 3.1 4 0 3.2 3.2 5 150 0 4.8 4.8 6 0 4.7 4.7 Observations: * After the addition of universal indicator solution to the pool water, the colour changed to light green.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work