• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

IB Economics Article Commentary. Effects of the Ban of Plastic bags in California.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ban of Plastic bags in California It is well known that there are very few places that are untouched by man around the world. Now days, anyone can notice the impacts of human activity on any landscape, especially the increasing pollution of plastic bags in urban and rural areas Thus, it is time to think of ways which would help to create an efficient system of allocation of resource. The government has decided to ban Plastic bags but this may cause much bigger problems to occur. Instead, they should find alternative way to solve the problem The assumption in dealing in the market is that the three main actors in the market will act in their own self interest, producing the best outcome having a Market Equilibrium (Where the social cost of the last unit produced = social benefit. ...read more.

Middle

having a Negative Externality (When consumption of a good negatively effects a third party). To meet the Socially Optimal Equilibrium (Where the social cost of the last unit produced = social benefit. This produces allocative efficiency.) the California Los Angeles County Board of supervisors approved preliminary ordinance that bands plastic bags at super markets. However, this Non-Marketing Solution (using non-market solutions, such as government rules, to solve an economic problem. Such solutions disregard the forces of supply and demand.) may be only creating a bigger problem around the society. By banning plastic bags it may be eliminating thousands of manufacturing jobs in California and also dismantle existing plastic bag recycling programs. This would be a Government Failure (the public sector analogy to market failure that occurs when a government intervention causes a more inefficient allocation of goods and resources than would occur without that intervention.), so ...read more.

Conclusion

to solve the problem. By choosing Coarse Theorem consumers will maximize utility and suppliers will be able maximize profits and there will be also no transaction costs between the suppliers and consumers. However firms may meet pollution objective with lower costs, causing more problem to occur in the environment. However, California can choose to tax their goods. It could have disadvantage, discouraging investment and production of plastic bags. Taxing the price of plastic bag will shift the market supply curve to social cost curve achieving the social optimal equilibrium. In short term government will be able to earn revenues as the rise of price due to tax will not be easily recognizable as the % of customer's total budget will be minimal. However in long term people will slowly recognize the price and carry their own bags to save money. This will achieve the goal of saving the environment. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Economics essays

  1. Old IB Questions

    increasing all its inputs. Thus, diseconomies of scale can be seen only in the long-run. Diseconomies of scale are responsible for the upward-sloping part of the long-run average total cost curve: as a firm increases plan size, costs per unit of output increase.

  2. Alabama's Cigarette Tax Article. The basic economic problem in this article is negative externalities. ...

    The result should reduce consumption from Q1 to the socially efficient level of output Q, while the price to consumers will be P2 or P3 depending on the tax increase. Fewer externalities are created and the government will gain significant tax revenue (Q x $1.36 or Q x $1),

  1. Allocation of Resources

    See also: * factors of production www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/allocation Diminishing returns plays an important part in the efficient allocation of resources. For efficiency, of course, we want to give more resources to the use in which they are more productive. But, as we give more resources to a particular use, we will observe diminishing returns -- that use will become less productive.

  2. The structure of the EU budget and its allocation

    support for the decommissioning of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant in Bulgaria. An overall increase for Heading 2 Preservation and management of natural resources of EUR 685 million in commitments and EUR 264 million in payments was proposed, as a consequence of an upwards revision of the estimated needs for

  1. Growth and Development Problem Set - IB Economics exam questions and answers.

    The population growth is a significant factor to influence economic growth. In my opinion, the rapid population growth in LDCs is an objective reflection of economic growth. Otherwise we cannot afford to raise children with limited resource and poor living standard.

  2. What is the impact of the Notional Interest Tax Deduction system on investments in ...

    Similarly, government revenue will be reduced from P1Q1C to only the P2Q1C. This presents the government with an opportunity cost since tax revenue will be reduced and thus spending on other areas of the economy will have to be reduced.

  1. Explain the Main Sources of Market Failure that Can Occur in the Market System ...

    They tend to spend less on goods or services. Therefore, consumers have more money in bank and it makes market works efficient in overall perspective. Second, subsidies operate such kind of the opposite way to taxes. They are direct payment in government to firms and businesses. The aim of subsidy is reducing the cost of goods or services in order to make cheaper price of them.

  2. 15 Historical Economic Questions on Mercatilism and the Development of European Countries.

    The main purpose of the economic stimulus package was to instill the confidence needed to restore economic growth by hopefully encouraging slightly increased or stable demand. Monetary policy had done all it could, and it was clear fiscal policy was needed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work