• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Wealth Doesnt Require Morals

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ryan Marschang AP Macroeconomics Final Exam Essay Question 1 Wealth Doesn't Require Morals American society is constantly evolving. Over the past three centuries Americans have experienced a wide array of economic, social and political change. Regardless, American society has always attempted to embody the ethos of individualism and the American dream; rags to riches. However, history clearly depicts the potential negative consequences of unregulated individualism - large economic disparity. In the early 1900's, captains of industry such as J.P Morgan and others acquired significant amounts of wealth and gained seemingly insurmountable amounts of power in society. Contrary to this, the majority of the citizens were left with remarkably small amounts of money. After Black Thursday and the New Deal, society cleaned itself up and became more egalitarian. Yet, the past three decades seem to hint that American society is undergoing a gradual socioeconomic transformation into a new 'Gilded Age' composed of inequality and implications for economic efficiency and political harmony. ...read more.

Middle

Krugman points out this transformation with extreme fervent. Initially, the collapse of equality and emergence of extravagance was contributed to three main theories. Firstly, the globalization hypothesis, which argued that the changing income distribution was due to the growth of world trade and growing imports of manufactured goods. Secondly, the "skill-biased technological change" theory, argues that the cause of growing inequality is grounded in domestic innovation, the increase demand for highly skilled and educated workers. Finally, the "superstar" theory, debates that modern technological change in communication has turned competition into a tournament in which the winner wins hugely and the others are rewarded to a small extent. However, according to Krugman, these three theories do not suffice in explaining the current level of inequality. For example, there has been a 2,500 % increase in CEO incomes and these theories cannot justify such statistics. Instead, Krugman attributes it all to a significant shift in social norms. The status quo is quite surprising. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, he looks at corporate executives pay and the fact that some CEO's are not paid for their performance but merely charisma and billboard qualities. Moreover, all of this is much more camouflaged that ever before and this to an extent pulls the wool over many citizens' eyes. This practice diverts resources away from productive uses and is inefficient. In conclusion, the facts and theories are on the table. The American ethos of individualism has emerged stronger and disparity is back. Is it just a matter of time before the repeal of the estate tax passes and vast amounts of wealth are allowed to be passed down and permanent classes will exist? The wealthy have found clever ways to by pass the present restrictions and so evidently new regulations must be enforced in order to devolve. Furthermore, the Unions and special interest groups organized against the rich must unite in order to join powers to attempt to counteract the influence of the rich. However, in the end, perhaps something will come along that will shake up society to the extent of the Great Depression and our resilient democracy will be saved from plutocracy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Economics essays

  1. Extended Essay

    made necessary modifications to the gas price subsidy system of the country between the years 2007 and 2009. The changes which were made by the government include: * Opening the market up, market liberalisation (according to the European Union agreement)

  2. What is the impact of the Notional Interest Tax Deduction system on investments in ...

    Businesses may use the NITDS to benefit an expansion of their business. Company A may expand in the form of equity and may open up company B. This can be a problem for the government since they are not receiving any tax from company B and can lead to a deduction in the government expenditure available.

  1. Strategic and Operational Performance Assessment at Petrom

    for the gas activity: the Gas business division focuses on sales to the large gas distribution companies and state-owned power producers, whereas the 100% affiliate Petrom Gas SRL expanded its market position in the end-user power plants and industrial sector; together with the small gas distribution network spun-off in 2007 into a wholly owned company (Petrom Distributie Gaze srl)

  2. Why did the UK did not join the EC until 1973

    F. Nelsen et al., 2003:8 - emphasis added). However the use of "we" did not imply that Britain would be an integral part of this new Europe but instead, as was expressed in his speech, it would merely be a friend and sponsor. For as much as Churchill loved singing the praise of a United States of Europe

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work