• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A period of economic and political stagnation. How valid is this assessment of the Brezhnev years?

Extracts from this document...


?A period of economic and political stagnation?. How valid is this assessment of the Brezhnev years? ?Only the fourth Soviet leader in half a century, heir to the brilliant Lenin, the tyrant Stalin and the buffoon Khrushchev. What style of leadership would he adopt?? McCauley?s question here is rhetorical, as there was no doubt that Leonid Brezhnev would lead his country into an era characterised by gradualism and a cautious pace, slowly making some selected changes to ensure his own survival, but stopping short of any real progress. Through his ascent to power and reversion of his predecessor?s administration, his economic policies and actions to silence dissidents, Brezhnev was attempting to preserve a Stalinist regime, but without its two vital components of the cult of personality and fear. His consequent reliance on bribery and excessive bureaucracy to compensate for this resulted in an epidemic of complacency developing across the Soviet Union as the Brezhnev years did indeed become a period of economic and political stagnation. It was specifically for his low key approach and moderatist stance that Brezhnev was chosen to be among the collective leadership following the fall of Khrushchev, as Russia was looking for a period of stability. ...read more.


Although the supply of livestock increased 300% and an increase in tractors reached 65% in 1965, which was later to fall to little over 6% just ten years later, the underlying problems in agriculture were left unresolved; a shortage of skilled labour, an emphasis on quantity over quality, and unsuitable roads, machinery and state quotas so that grain still had to be imported from countries like the USA and Argentina as late into the Brezhnev years as 1980. Brezhnev?s mismanagement of agriculture also created environmental problems that proved to be economically devastating; in the case of Lake Baikal, drained for irrigation, natural resources were abused to the extent that the entire area?s fishing industry collapsed. A similar outcome was the result of Brezhnev?s industrial policies, where a primary focus was put on producing consumer goods in the eighth, ninth and tenth Five Year Plans, in line with Brezhnev?s own penchant for creature comforts. The number of cars in Russia increased from 201,200 in 1965 to 1,327,000 in 1985, yet this was only a third of the number in Britain, a country with a comparably minute population. Any beneficial measures were met with limited success in practice due to massive arms expenditure, the apathy of managers already content with their lot, and huge amounts of red tape preventing much progress, ...read more.


According to one dissident, Andrei Sinyavsky, ?during Brezhnev?s time two more backwards steps were taken, and history wavered on the edge of returning to full Stalinism...but stopped short?. This was a recurrent theme of the Brezhnev years, which stopped short of any real success and could not even achieve a full regression to Stalinism. Despite Brezhnev?s ability as a leader, he led his country to what can be described at best as a period of economic and political stagnation, and at worst the period that made certain the decline of Communism. Brezhnev did not share the fervent belief of some party members, including Khrushchev, that traditional Communism was the best political system, as evidenced by his acceptance and encouragement of a corrupt and divided society through bribery, wage brackets and nepotism. Neither did he do anything to inspire this belief in their political system to the people of Russia. Volkogonov asserted that ?to enliven the moribund ideology of Communism...was quite beyond Brezhnev? and goes on to state that his image ?was not only as the harbinger of the collapse of the system, but also as the symbol of the decline of Bolshevik power, towards which the people had long become indifferent?. Although his initial gradualism and caution was merited, Brezhnev?s mistake was to allow it to descend into an economic, social and political stagnation, a corrupt complacency, and socialism, albeit slowly, fell apart. Ciara Lally 06.09.2010 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. I.B Internal Assessment- History- Assess the aims and impact of the Black Panthers between ...

    The Black Panther Party aimed to change this issue; they aimed for freedom for the Black community and the ability to determine their own destiny. If this aim was to be satisfied it would impact the power equation between the relationships of the Blacks and Whites24.

  2. Internal Assessment - How effective were the policies implemented by the U.S. during the ...

    Analysis The US occupation of Japan during the years 1945 to 1952 was a change as abrupt as the Meiji Restoration, completely dismantling and reconstructing the political system of Japan. With Douglas MacArthur as the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP), the U.S.

  1. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    They most certainly did propagate this as the republic only sought out for short-term success, like the Dawes Plan, rather than long-term reforms. The Weimar government lacked a charismatic leader, had economic shortfalls, society was hostile towards it and above all, it in itself was a weak organisation bound to

  2. Internal Assessment: Camp David and Oslo Accords

    Jerusalem as a religious and political capital * Arafat refused Barak's suggestion, of Israel giving back most of West Bank occupied territory since 1967 and the Muslim and Christian areas in Jerusalem6 * (July 18) Barak proposed limited Palestinian resettlement in Israel under international supervision * Arafat's view * Palestinian

  1. Mao - his social and economic policies and his decline and re-establishment of power

    experience of working with the peasants, the CCP adopted a gradualist approach to introducing socialism into the countryside. * The CCP leadership was convinced that collectivisation was essential for increasing agricultural efficiency as well as for fulfilling their ideological aims.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    2. Recognized independence of Poland (behind German lines) and ordered other nationalities to wait for the decisions of the Constituent Assembly. Why did the Provisional Government fail? Internal problems 1. Refused to take initiative until a fully democratic assembly was elected. Torn by internal disagreements, party divisions, and personality conflicts.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    President Clinton in Washington in 1993 Following the Oslo I - On May 4 1994 Israel withdrew from GS and Jericho and transferred powers to the Palestinian authority. The first stage occurred with no trouble but Hamas tried to discredit Arafat at every opportunity by attacking Israeli soldiers and civilians,

  2. Explain why Britain joined the EEC in 1973 and why the process caused so ...

    the other ECC nations opened the way for British entry on the 1st of January 1973. ?The EEC and the United Kingdom together would constitute a major force in the world economy and have a strong negotiating position in international discussions' and `the EEC would also benefit from a substantial British asset-the financial expertise of London? (6)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work