• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A period of economic and political stagnation. How valid is this assessment of the Brezhnev years?

Extracts from this document...


?A period of economic and political stagnation?. How valid is this assessment of the Brezhnev years? ?Only the fourth Soviet leader in half a century, heir to the brilliant Lenin, the tyrant Stalin and the buffoon Khrushchev. What style of leadership would he adopt?? McCauley?s question here is rhetorical, as there was no doubt that Leonid Brezhnev would lead his country into an era characterised by gradualism and a cautious pace, slowly making some selected changes to ensure his own survival, but stopping short of any real progress. Through his ascent to power and reversion of his predecessor?s administration, his economic policies and actions to silence dissidents, Brezhnev was attempting to preserve a Stalinist regime, but without its two vital components of the cult of personality and fear. His consequent reliance on bribery and excessive bureaucracy to compensate for this resulted in an epidemic of complacency developing across the Soviet Union as the Brezhnev years did indeed become a period of economic and political stagnation. It was specifically for his low key approach and moderatist stance that Brezhnev was chosen to be among the collective leadership following the fall of Khrushchev, as Russia was looking for a period of stability. ...read more.


Although the supply of livestock increased 300% and an increase in tractors reached 65% in 1965, which was later to fall to little over 6% just ten years later, the underlying problems in agriculture were left unresolved; a shortage of skilled labour, an emphasis on quantity over quality, and unsuitable roads, machinery and state quotas so that grain still had to be imported from countries like the USA and Argentina as late into the Brezhnev years as 1980. Brezhnev?s mismanagement of agriculture also created environmental problems that proved to be economically devastating; in the case of Lake Baikal, drained for irrigation, natural resources were abused to the extent that the entire area?s fishing industry collapsed. A similar outcome was the result of Brezhnev?s industrial policies, where a primary focus was put on producing consumer goods in the eighth, ninth and tenth Five Year Plans, in line with Brezhnev?s own penchant for creature comforts. The number of cars in Russia increased from 201,200 in 1965 to 1,327,000 in 1985, yet this was only a third of the number in Britain, a country with a comparably minute population. Any beneficial measures were met with limited success in practice due to massive arms expenditure, the apathy of managers already content with their lot, and huge amounts of red tape preventing much progress, ...read more.


According to one dissident, Andrei Sinyavsky, ?during Brezhnev?s time two more backwards steps were taken, and history wavered on the edge of returning to full Stalinism...but stopped short?. This was a recurrent theme of the Brezhnev years, which stopped short of any real success and could not even achieve a full regression to Stalinism. Despite Brezhnev?s ability as a leader, he led his country to what can be described at best as a period of economic and political stagnation, and at worst the period that made certain the decline of Communism. Brezhnev did not share the fervent belief of some party members, including Khrushchev, that traditional Communism was the best political system, as evidenced by his acceptance and encouragement of a corrupt and divided society through bribery, wage brackets and nepotism. Neither did he do anything to inspire this belief in their political system to the people of Russia. Volkogonov asserted that ?to enliven the moribund ideology of Communism...was quite beyond Brezhnev? and goes on to state that his image ?was not only as the harbinger of the collapse of the system, but also as the symbol of the decline of Bolshevik power, towards which the people had long become indifferent?. Although his initial gradualism and caution was merited, Brezhnev?s mistake was to allow it to descend into an economic, social and political stagnation, a corrupt complacency, and socialism, albeit slowly, fell apart. Ciara Lally 06.09.2010 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Internal Assessment - How effective were the policies implemented by the U.S. during the ...

    (Arashi Shimbun Staff) This can be deemed as a consequential failure of the U.S. to demilitarize Japan. When the wind of Communism struck the U.S. as potential threats in 1948, MacArthur changes the course of Japanese rehabilitation from a peaceful country to an economic powerhouse which could outstand Communist threats.

  2. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    another aspect of the settlement that German critics were quick to seize on and label inconsistent. * Indeed, the famous economist, John Maynard Keynes labelled the terms of the treaty, a "Carthegian peace" meaning that it would result in all-out pandemonium.

  1. I.B Internal Assessment- History- Assess the aims and impact of the Black Panthers between ...

    Panthers, it is generally accepted that the Black Panthers were emerged in women's liberation, one of the few groups interested at that time23. The African-Americans felt as if they were slaved in a free country, they did not have the power to speak out or to determine who they were.

  2. Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar ...

    Unemployment, due to this, also rose to over 1 million people without jobs starting from 1928. Surprisingly, the Weimar culture too played a role in weakening the republic. Many extremists' supporters saw the revolution as a disintegration of German tradition and evidence on the "unpatriotic nature" of the Weimar government.

  1. Was there continuous economic decline in Britain from 1951 to 1990

    This caused weak industries to be over-protected from competition. Moreover, it burdened efficient industries with taxes and too much regulation. The same governments also seemed to have devaluated technological education and favored literary degrees. This hindered innovation in industry in the long term while other countries such as Germany had a lot more engineers to help out modernizing their industry.

  2. How valid is to claim that "Europe stumbled into a war in 1914"?

    Russia, after realizing it could not expand at the Far East anymore because of the Japanese influence, had become more interested in the Balkans and was willing to support Serbia if it decided to fight Austria-Hungary. France, although not keen to fight a war, did little to avoid it as

  1. How successful was Khrushchev as Soviet Leader?

    It also prompted active opposition to Khrushchev?s rule, orchestrated by the party members unhappy with their Leader?s denouncing. Therefore with his premature secret speech, Khrushchev ensured that de-Stalinisation became ?a double-edged sword? in the words of McCauley, which cancelled out any success the policy might otherwise have had.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Positive reformer who could have saved Tsarist autocracy 3. Pessimists little political or economic progress, reforms still left poverty-stricken peasants and increased urban workers, both contributed to instability. 4. Soviets/Marxists any attempt to save Tsarism doomed to failure as revolution was the only possible outcome of the social and economic forces at work.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work