• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bismarck's policies. While when he was Chancellor, Bismarcks main aim will have been to maintain a strong German Empire, eradicating certain opponents within the Empire and keeping peace in Europe. These aims are reflected in his policies between

Extracts from this document...


Bismarck's policies On the 23rd September 1862, Bismarck was appointed Minister president and foreign minister of Prussia under King Wilhelm I. and in 1871 he became the first chancellor of the German Empire. During his time as Minister president Bismarck wanted to create a dominant state of Prussia, which was stronger than Austria and had more influence in the German states. Unifying the German states may only have been a way to achieve this. While when he was Chancellor, Bismarck's main aim will have been to maintain a strong German Empire, eradicating certain opponents within the Empire and keeping peace in Europe. These aims are reflected in his policies between 1862 and 1890. Bismarck's first action when he came into power in 1862, was the Iron & Blood Speech, held to the General assembly to convince them of King Wilhelm's plan of increasing the military budget. Bismarck's aim of convincing the assembly succeeded and through this he manifested his position as minister president and also managed to increase Prussia's military power. The 1867 Zollverein constitution provided for a federal council of customs, the Zollbundesrat, which was comprised of personal representatives of the several rulers and an elected customs parliament Zollparlarment. This was a success for Bismarck because it meant that Prussia gained more influence in the German states through both bodies. ...read more.


Bismarck sent General Alvensleben to St. Petersburg to allow Russian troops to pass through Prussian territory in pursuit of Polish rebels, which improved the relationship between the two countries. On the 1st February 1864, the Austrian and Prussian armies invaded Denmark. This however led to a dispute about who was to gain which territory. In general the war with Denmark was a success for Bismarck because it meant Prussian expansion. The issue of who gained which territory was resolved at the Gastein Convention on August 20th 1865. Prussia would administer Schleswig while, Austria received Holstein. However as Holstein was located between Schleswig to the north and Prussia to the south, Austria's influence was very limited. This was a success for Bismarck because he managed to gain territory, while Austria only had limited influence over the territory it gained, especially as the Dutchies were admitted to the Zollverein of which Austria wasn't part. The Austro-Prussian war of 1866 was a success for Bismarck. He managed to demonstrate Prussia's strength to the rest of Europe. He defeated his great rivals, the Austrians and also gained the territory Schleswig. Furthermore it led to the complete dominance of Prussia within the German confederation. Bismarck managed to ensure that the other great powers supported Prussia or at least stayed neutral. The meeting at Biarritz with Napoleon III. ...read more.


Bismarck had to act quickly and signed the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia, which stated that both countries were to stay neutral in case of a dispute with a third power, which wasn't true if Germany attacked France or Russia attacked Austria-Hungary. This inhibited the acute danger of an Austro-Russian war, and put Bismarck into the position of being able to decide between which of the powers he would support in case of war. When Bismarck decided to engage in the Scramble for Africa, particularly in the years 1884-1885 he probably did this to seek new sources of raw materials and consumers for German manufactured goods. However this episode of Bismarck's foreign policies turned out to be a disappointment because there were not as many natural resources as anticipated with the exception of diamonds in South-West Africa and the population there wasn't strong enough or developed enough to be potential customers of German manufactured goods. Otto von Bismarck managed to unite Germany during his time as Minister President of President of Prussia and was successful in making Germany/Prussia one of the great powers in Europe as well as eliminating Austria from Germany. During the period from 1962 to 1971 Bismarck's foreign policies were comparably successful to his domestic policies. However during his time as German Chancellor his domestic policies weren't as successful because he didn't achieve many of his aims such as eradicating socialism, while he fulfilled his primary foreign aim of keeping peace in Europe. Therefore overall his foreign policies between 1962 and 1990 were more successful than his domestic policies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent was Stalin's rise to power due to his opponents' mistakes?

    As a result, the British government broke off all ties with Russia leaving them worse than before. At the same time, the Chinese Communist Party was desperately defeated in China. The Spartacists, a Communist revolt at the end of WWI, failed to seize power in Germany and the Bela Kun

  2. Bismarck's policies success

    Bismarck prevented the export of horses, giving the illusion that he was keeping them in case they were needed for war. France took this opportunity to inform Britain and Russia of what was going on. They both greatly disapproved of the idea of Germany going into war with France.

  1. Italian Unification: True Father of Italy

    In fact, Napoleon III had other intentions for supporting the Italian Unification; he had other interests. In fact, he did not want the Italian Unification but instead wished for a federal Italy in which he can use and manipulate in order to protect his vast empire especially from Austria and Prussia; form an ally - a pact.

  2. Why had Prussia, rather than Austria, emerged as the dominant German power by 1871?

    In the contrary, only a very small amount of Austrian people had access to education, as all schools in the Austrian empire were private. Although the Austrian educational system also changed (but later), these effects would only become visible later, as it takes time to educate.

  1. the importance of the role of Bismarck in the unification of Germany in 1871

    lack of dedication from the two biggest German states; Austria and Prussia - it did lay down the ideas of a Grossdeutschland and a Kleindeutschland, and more importantly; it represented the desires for a unified Germany in pre-Bismarck times. By the time that Otto von Bismarck was appointed as Chief

  2. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    Its conception was supposed to have simmered down the chaos of the great 'melting pot', however, this was not the case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow's grip over Eastern Europe? "Incongruence between Communism and Czech disposition has a history which reveals long and genuine striving

  1. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    Right then, the US requested U Thant to make another appeal to the Soviet even though it had not agreed to his first message yet. Kennedy said to Stevenson, ?See if U Thant on his own responsibility will ask Mr.

  2. US History. To what extent were the aims of Reconstruction achieved by 1877?

    on accomplishing and finishing this process and also the realization in the North that the South could not be trusted, therefore, as Southern states were also represented by northerners, the South was weak and could not fight back the decisions taken by the north, making Reconstruction easier to achieve its aims and succeed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work