• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Cause of WW1

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IB History: There is no doubt that both Germany and Austria-Hungary's actions prior to 1914 can be attributed to the cause of the First World War. Many claim that Germany and her allies "willed the war"; basing their arguments on Germany's position for war and its aggressive stance with Weltpolitik, whilst others argue that "the nations of Europe stumbled into war". Between these two extremes is a broad central position that holds that while no one nation can be held entirely responsible for the war, some nations were more responsible than others. In considering the controversial issue of Germany's and Austria-Hungary's responsibility for the war, one must make distinctions between their contributions to the growth of international tension from 1897 to 1913 and their roles during the July Crisis itself. Germany's Weltpolitik policy can be seen as an aggressive stance that soured international relations from 1897 to 1912 and whose failure inspired a bid for world power through war in 1914. ...read more.

Middle

Although there is no doubt that Austria-Hungary was under pressure from Germany to retaliate, there is much evidence to suggest that she needed no prompting from Berlin. After Sarajevo Austria-Hungary was placed in a difficult position, inaction meant "the renunciation of our Great Power position" as the foreign minister put it. However, action against Serbia would most likely mean war against Russia. In the view point of the Emperor, Franz Joseph, the time after Sarajevo was necessary "to eliminate Serbia as a political factor in the Balkans". Austria-Hungary used the assassination of Franz Ferdinand as an excuse to crush Serbia and prevent any further nationalistic behaviour in the Balkans. It is because of this one can argue that Austria-Hungary contributed greatly to the development of the July Crisis by lengthy delays in its response to Sarajevo, evidence in the fact that the ultimatum was only delivered a month after the incident. Allowing tension to grow within Europe as nations waited to see Austria-Hungary's response. ...read more.

Conclusion

Secondly, Russia was unwillingly, or unable to quell Slav nationalism, endangering the peace and stability of Europe. Russia was the first of the powers to mobilise, despite the implications of this, especially for Germany, who felt pressured by the movement of Russian soldiers on the border. Russia's promises of support to Serbia are also believed to have influenced the decision not to accept the Austrian ultimatum, leading to the Austrian declaration of war. Although many still believe that Germany willed the war, the real issue of 1914 was not a bid for world domination but the desperate need to preserve Austria-Hungary's position as a great power and ally. The charge against Germany and her allies is that they pursued in an aggressive way what was an essentially defensive posture. In particular, the fact that Germany did not make a single constructive move in July to defuse the crisis but took a number of calculated risks, "a series of gambles that did not work out". It is because of this that Germany and Austria-Hungary can be seen to be the major contributors to the outbreak of war in 1914. ?? ?? ?? ?? The Cause of WWI ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. How valid is to claim that "Europe stumbled into a war in 1914"?

    Russia, after realizing it could not expand at the Far East anymore because of the Japanese influence, had become more interested in the Balkans and was willing to support Serbia if it decided to fight Austria-Hungary. France, although not keen to fight a war, did little to avoid it as

  2. World War 1 Information

    Russia is excited to go to war, but that is cut off soon after > Most trade was cut off because of the surrounding countries and only 2 ports were open in wartime > Food shortages (only 1 railroad but was not used to transport food)

  1. Why did Germany & Her Allies Lose WW1?

    The British controlled the North Sea with their powerful naval force that consisted of Dreadnoughts, sinking many German ships which therefore cut supplies of food and raw materials like Nitrates, which were vital in making explosives for the German army and serving as fertilizers for German farmers.

  2. To what extent was Germanys defeat in WW1 due to the Allies strengths and ...

    Failure to "bleed them (The French) white by virtue of our (German) superiority in guns" saw Commander Erich von Falkenhayn throw countless waves of German troops in to the line of fire, demoralizing and crippling the German army formation at Verdun. With almost no territorial or tactical advantages gained, this war of attrition saw German forces devastatingly pushed back behind the Hindenburg Line.

  1. How Nationalism In The Balkans Contributed To The Outbreak Of WW1

    The Serbs became furious and proclaimed war because they felt threatened by this act. Surprisingly the Bulgarians proved to be a greater match for the Serbs and in the battle of Slivnitza, they were defeated. Britain agreed to the unification of Eastern Rumelia and Bulgaria and the Balkan States again gained more power through their nationalistic ideologies.

  2. To what extent can Berlin or Vienna can be held accountable for the start ...

    Without the Turkish Empire ruling the Balkans, nationalism and a desire of self-determination grew among the minorities, especially for Serbia to annex Bosnia-Herzegovina (controlled by Austria-Hungary) An armed struggle seemed to be the only appropriate response against the panslavic ambitions of Serbia even before the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    He had no interest in a body in which he held a minority. Eliminated opposition. 4. From an ideological point of view he saw it as Western parliamentary democracy, he wanted Soviet rule controlled by Bolsheviks and dictatorship of the proletariat.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    tenacity and fighting spirit during the Israeli invasion, which raised nationalistic Palestinian hopes and moral everywhere: increased determination to resist Israeli rule - Worldwide sentiment shifted away from Israel after the atrocities and towards the Palestinian causes - 40,000 would die on both sides and Beirut was completely destroyed -

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work