• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Internal Assessment: Camp David and Oslo Accords

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which peace process was more effective in attempting to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: the 1993 Oslo Accords or the Middle East Peace Summit at Camp David in 2000? Libby Liang Kiana Yau Word Count: 1999 History Internal Assessment International Baccalaureate Programme Sir Winston Churchill Secondary School Mr. R. Picard May 2011 Table of Contents Section A: Plan of Investigation .............................................................. Page 1 Section B: Summary of Evidence ............................................................ Page 2 Section C: Evaluation of Sources ............................................................. Page 6 Section D: Analysis .............................................................................. Page 8 Section E: Conclusion ...........................................................................Page 11 Bibliography ...................................................................................... Page 12 Section A: Plan of Investigation This investigation seeks to determine which peace talk was more effective in attempting to resolve the Palestinian-Israel conflict: the 1993 Oslo Accords or the Middle East Peace Summit at Camp David in 2000. To complete this investigation, related primary sources, secondary historian accounts, and biographies from a variety of perspectives will be analyzed and their different views regarding the issue will be focused upon. While a variety of sources will be analyzed, two of the primary sources will be evaluated in depth for their origin, purpose, value, and limitation: The Oslo Declaration of Principles and The Trilateral Statement issued by the United States, Israel, and the Palestinians at the Camp David Summit. ...read more.

Middle

The purpose of this declaration is for Israel and the Palestinians to recognize their legitimacy and mutual rights of existence and to commit themselves to negotiating a permanent settlement to improve relations between the two parties. The value is that it provides candid insights into some of the important issues that were discussed, such as troop withdrawal, in the meeting between the two sides, and it also reflects the perspectives of the people, such as Rabin and Arafat, involved in the negotiation. The limitations of this primary source include its vagueness in its proposal for negotiation. Instead of providing a definitive solution over some of key issues, such as the status of Jerusalem and the problem of Palestinian refugees, this document only serves as a framework for future peace talks due to its lack of details. Also, the document may not reflect the real discussion during the Oslo process, since it is a declaration released to the public. Source 2: The Trilateral Statement issued by the United States, Israel, and the Palestinians on the Camp David Summit, July 25, 2000 The Trilateral statement is a primary document issued cooperatively by the United States, the Israelis, and the Palestinians on July 25th, 2000, the last day of the Camp David Summit. ...read more.

Conclusion

His argument was strong in focusing on the overall influence of the Oslo Accord while considering other historical views as well. Overall what was realized is that the Oslo Accord was a negotiation primarily between the two parties with little external pressure (such as the US), and it was a breakthrough in trying to resolve the conflict on both diplomatic and economic levels. There was the consideration of dealing with the political opposition between the two sides and the social and economic stability of both peoples. Ben-Dor's argument was strong and reliable in helping to answer our investigation. Section E: Conclusion While both the Oslo Accords and Camp David had the same objective of promoting peace and reaching a non-temporary agreement, they produced different outcomes that had huge impacts on the Palestinian-Israeli relations. The Oslo Accord was significant in trying to reach an agreement between the Palestinians and Israel from both political and economic aspects. It had the aim of promoting peace between the two authorities and achieving stability for the civilians. Conversely, the urgency and desperation in Camp David contributed to its fatal flaw of struggling to reach a final agreement between the Palestinians and the Israelis, leaving many key issues, such as Jerusalem, to be unresolved. While the Oslo Accord provided an opportunity to thaw the tension between the two sides, Camp David lead to nowhere but escalation of violence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. History Internal Assesment

    In the end this secret agreement leaked to the press, causing great embarrassment in Britain and France. The Plan was nullified, officially destroying the last attempt of the western powers to prevent the conflict before it reached the League of Nations.

  2. History internal Assessment (The subsidiary role of women in Nazi society)

    Alfred Rosenberg compared the role of women to 'lyrical' and men to 'architectural'.9 When the birth rate declined, Nazi started even see the problem as the Jewish conspiracy and women's Liberian movements. Women's duties were clearly stated in national propaganda: Children, Church, Kitchen and there was made much to eliminate

  1. Schlieffen Plan - analysis of the sources

    Another contrast between Source C and D is the cruelty of the request for passage through Belgium. In Source D, the dialogue from the German diplomat, Von Jagow, is more sympathetic towards Germany in the demand of request for passage through Belgium, whereas in Source C, harsh words in the written letter show no sympathy towards Germany.

  2. Favorable external and internal circumstances, not Bismarcks diplomatic genius, explain the unification of Germany ...

    The Growth of Nationalism The growth of German nationalism throughout the beginning of the 19th century also played a crucial role in the formation of a unified Germany. The Zollverein may have laid the foundations for a possible unification, but the widespread feeling of nationalism among the middleclass liberals made it a realistic event.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    armies attack Israel simultaneously at 2pm, it is the holiest day of the Jewish year. Israel is taken by surprise. 7 Egypt crosses the Suez Canal 8 Israel launches a counter attack 10 Syria is pushed back behind its 1967 lines 13-14 Egypt's 4th and 21st armoured divisions attack Israel

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    U Thant?s public statement was strongly criticized by the Soviet Union ambassador Valery Zorin, for not vigorously disapproving the US?s quarantine on Cuba. Irritated by his persistent censure, U Thant suggested to Zorin to make this claim at the Security Council meeting, which he did so.[11] Taking Zorin as an

  1. Executive Dysfunction: Franklin Delano Roosevelts Health and Effectiveness in His Final Term of Presidency

    the ability to complete a complex cognitive task, and syntheses, the ability to appreciate metaphoric meaning and monitor cognitive performance. Basically, these functions comprise our ability to work efficiently and complete higher-level activities. Evidence exists from observations of physicians, advisors, colleagues, and aides that suggest that Franklin Roosevelt experienced major

  2. British role in the establishment of The State of Israel

    The Mandate agreement was thus framed largely with clauses that favored the Zionist cause over Palestinian self-determination[3] Secondly, in March, 1938, following several weeks of experimental ambushes and patrols, British General Officer Commanding (GOC), Lieutenant-General Archibald Wavell gave permission to Captain Orde Charles Wingate the, Major General of the British Army to establish a joint British-Jewish unit for night operations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work