• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15

Napoleon Bonaparte: Son or Enemy of the Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Napoleon Bonaparte: Son or Enemy of the Revolution? Table of Contents______________________________________________________________ Plan of Investigation____________________________________________________ Page 3 Summary of Evidence___________________________________________________ Page 4 Evaluation of Sources ___________________________________________________ Page 8 Analysis _______________________________________________________________Page 10 Conclusion_____________________________________________________________Page 13 Bibliography___________________________________________________________ Page 14 Plan of Investigation___________________________________________________________ Was Napoleon Bonaparte a son or an enemy of the Revolution? The aim of this investigation is to assess the role of Napoleon Bonapartee role of Napoleon in the revolution; whether he was the son or the enemy of the revolution. in the revolution; whether he was the son or the enemy of the revolution. The scope of this research rests upon the use of secondary sources and focuses on Napoleon's domestic, economical, foreign, social and religious policies during his regime; the Napoleonic era (November 1799 to 1815). The investigation will analyze different interpretations of other historians regarding the role of Napoleon in the revolution; whether he was the son or the enemy of the revolution. Under the section "Evaluation of Sources," two sources (Napoleonic Era and Napoleon From 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799-1807) will be evaluated according to their origins, purpose, values and limitations. Summary of Evidence__________________________________________________________ Background Information: -Bourbon family, King Louis XVI, ruled France until the French Revolution occurred in 17891. -In November 1799, Napoleon seized power of the French empire as The Revolt of Brumaire broke out, triggered by the failure of The Directory, until his fall in 1815.2 Domestic Policy: -Before Napoleon seized power, the Bourbon family appreciated ...read more.

Middle

It is the Volume I of the two volume set which covers the period of 1799-1807 presenting a history of those years that were dominated by Napoleon Bonaparte. It provides a general history of the French people and the background to the revolution that gave Napoleon his chance, incorporating relevant quotation from other sources and primary documents, adding objectivity to the interpretations put forth. Nevertheless, as the author is French, one might question its objectivity in that the work could either be too pro-Napoleon or anti-Napoleon. Yet, Lefebvre would have had a better understanding of the subtleties of the French language; hence, his analysis of French documents concerning Napoleon would be more effective. However, the translation of Lefebvre's book into English could be a problem, depending on the level of accuracy of the translation. In addition, he often wrote from a viewpoint which he felt the peasant of the time would have held 23 - neglecting the viewpoint of other French social class. Also, Lefebvre was influenced by the Marxist idea that history should be concerned with economic structures and class relations 24, therefore, could have neglected other aspects of history in his work. On the other hand, Napoleonic Era, written by Will Durant, an American, is also a secondary source, published in 1963. The book was written with the purpose to provide insights of Napoleon's character and personality, as well as, the events occurred in his era to students. ...read more.

Conclusion

Napoleon intended to use the church for his own purposes; his treatment of the Pope in the later years of the Empire gave strong warning against making any church a forum for discussion which might be considered hostile to the government. Conclusion___________________________________________________________________ All in all, Napoleon, a product of the French Revolution, who seized power after the end of the Bourbon dynasty, was neither a son nor an enemy of the revolution but a fusion between the two. From the evidence found, it is clear that Napoleon used the ideas of enlightenment during his rule despite the fact that he sometimes made despotic decisions and changes. It is true that there were some negative aspects during Napoleon's rule such as intimidation and execution. However, after the investigation, there seems to be more evidence that justify Napoleon as a son of the revolution. And this is due to the fact that he made progress, reforms and established order, stability not only in France but Europe as well. Also, the creation of modern national states in Europe such as Italy and Germany owes its existence to Napoleon. Furthermore, Napoleon was fully responsible for making France a powerful nation; one of the great-influential powers in Europe by uniting France, reinforcing nationalism by conquests, and gaining tremendous amount of resources and territorial acquisition. And, after the abdication of Napoleon, the French Empire once again faced domestic and foreign problems and started to fall apart. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent can Napoleon be considered the "Son of the Revolution"?

    However, Napoleons constitution was contradictory to what the revolution supported. As Napoleon grew in power and in confidence the then cautious "son" now, became more aggressive. In 1801, he said "We finished with the romance of the Revolution; we must now begin its history".

  2. Revision notes - Causes of the French Revolution and the Development of the Revolution ...

    He then ordered the deputies to disperse to their different meeting places. The National Assembly refused to go. The next day Third Estate was joined by 151clergy and 47 nobles. Meanwhile popular demonstrations broke out in Paris and elsewhere in support of National Assembly.

  1. French Revolution: Success or Failure?

    If they did not proposed the law then it might brought the France to face with deeper problems. It clearly depicts that the French Revolution created the ideas and laws which were the best way to pass the benefits to the French citizens.

  2. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    The official royal residence was Palace of Versailles. * In the second half of the 18th century -> 5 states were regarded as a great powers of Europe and decided on European policy (because of the military forces). France, Great Britain, Prussia, Russia and Austria.

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    Pope Pius IV � While far from liberal he was not an out and out reactionary. � He granted an amnesty to 2,000 liberals and political prisoners in the Papal States � Administrative and educational reforms followed. In 1847 Pius ended censorship.

  2. The Glorious Revolution

    In the beginning of his rule, James II passed an act similar to the Test Act. Unlike the Test Act, his new law favored the Catholics instead of the Protestants. Also, James II issued another Declaration of Indulgence, which nullified all laws that prevented Catholics and Dissenters from holding military or civil offices.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    30% noble, 13% official, 21% priest 25% worker/peasant. Signs of relaxation of repression 1880 1. Shuvalov was appointed as ambassador to London in 1874 which removed the main reactionary associated with repression. 2. Conservatives were replaced with semi-liberals such as Loris-Melikov. He headed a special committee in 1880 which considered reforms to meet the revolutionary challenge and he abolished the Third Section and transferred its power to police.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The US had talked directly with the Palestinians for the first time in 1989: o Israel was already at peace with Egypt o It has not fought Jordan for decades though the two were still officially at war o

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work