• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Napoleon Bonaparte: Son or Enemy of the Revolution?

Extracts from this document...


Napoleon Bonaparte: Son or Enemy of the Revolution? Table of Contents______________________________________________________________ Plan of Investigation____________________________________________________ Page 3 Summary of Evidence___________________________________________________ Page 4 Evaluation of Sources ___________________________________________________ Page 8 Analysis _______________________________________________________________Page 10 Conclusion_____________________________________________________________Page 13 Bibliography___________________________________________________________ Page 14 Plan of Investigation___________________________________________________________ Was Napoleon Bonaparte a son or an enemy of the Revolution? The aim of this investigation is to assess the role of Napoleon Bonapartee role of Napoleon in the revolution; whether he was the son or the enemy of the revolution. in the revolution; whether he was the son or the enemy of the revolution. The scope of this research rests upon the use of secondary sources and focuses on Napoleon's domestic, economical, foreign, social and religious policies during his regime; the Napoleonic era (November 1799 to 1815). The investigation will analyze different interpretations of other historians regarding the role of Napoleon in the revolution; whether he was the son or the enemy of the revolution. Under the section "Evaluation of Sources," two sources (Napoleonic Era and Napoleon From 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799-1807) will be evaluated according to their origins, purpose, values and limitations. Summary of Evidence__________________________________________________________ Background Information: -Bourbon family, King Louis XVI, ruled France until the French Revolution occurred in 17891. -In November 1799, Napoleon seized power of the French empire as The Revolt of Brumaire broke out, triggered by the failure of The Directory, until his fall in 1815.2 Domestic Policy: -Before Napoleon seized power, the Bourbon family appreciated ...read more.


It is the Volume I of the two volume set which covers the period of 1799-1807 presenting a history of those years that were dominated by Napoleon Bonaparte. It provides a general history of the French people and the background to the revolution that gave Napoleon his chance, incorporating relevant quotation from other sources and primary documents, adding objectivity to the interpretations put forth. Nevertheless, as the author is French, one might question its objectivity in that the work could either be too pro-Napoleon or anti-Napoleon. Yet, Lefebvre would have had a better understanding of the subtleties of the French language; hence, his analysis of French documents concerning Napoleon would be more effective. However, the translation of Lefebvre's book into English could be a problem, depending on the level of accuracy of the translation. In addition, he often wrote from a viewpoint which he felt the peasant of the time would have held 23 - neglecting the viewpoint of other French social class. Also, Lefebvre was influenced by the Marxist idea that history should be concerned with economic structures and class relations 24, therefore, could have neglected other aspects of history in his work. On the other hand, Napoleonic Era, written by Will Durant, an American, is also a secondary source, published in 1963. The book was written with the purpose to provide insights of Napoleon's character and personality, as well as, the events occurred in his era to students. ...read more.


Napoleon intended to use the church for his own purposes; his treatment of the Pope in the later years of the Empire gave strong warning against making any church a forum for discussion which might be considered hostile to the government. Conclusion___________________________________________________________________ All in all, Napoleon, a product of the French Revolution, who seized power after the end of the Bourbon dynasty, was neither a son nor an enemy of the revolution but a fusion between the two. From the evidence found, it is clear that Napoleon used the ideas of enlightenment during his rule despite the fact that he sometimes made despotic decisions and changes. It is true that there were some negative aspects during Napoleon's rule such as intimidation and execution. However, after the investigation, there seems to be more evidence that justify Napoleon as a son of the revolution. And this is due to the fact that he made progress, reforms and established order, stability not only in France but Europe as well. Also, the creation of modern national states in Europe such as Italy and Germany owes its existence to Napoleon. Furthermore, Napoleon was fully responsible for making France a powerful nation; one of the great-influential powers in Europe by uniting France, reinforcing nationalism by conquests, and gaining tremendous amount of resources and territorial acquisition. And, after the abdication of Napoleon, the French Empire once again faced domestic and foreign problems and started to fall apart. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. To what extent can Napoleon be considered the "Son of the Revolution"?

    However, Napoleons constitution was contradictory to what the revolution supported. As Napoleon grew in power and in confidence the then cautious "son" now, became more aggressive. In 1801, he said "We finished with the romance of the Revolution; we must now begin its history".

  2. George Orwell in the Spanish Revolution

    The pillars of a worker's state perhaps? 4) How and why did the trade unions support the Republic? As Orwell states, in the first few months of Franco's insurgency, his real opponent was not the government but the trade unions.

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    � Many historians have stressed the 1848 revolutions as evidence of the growing national consciousness in Italy. � Denis Mack Smith has stressed the deep divisions - between radicals and liberals, between urban and rural - and argues that the degree of national consciousness should not be exaggerated.

  2. Revision notes - Causes of the French Revolution and the Development of the Revolution ...

    King under a great deal of pressure from his wife, Marie Antoinette, and his brother to stand firm, declared that any resolutions made by the Third Estate were void and that Estates General should continue to meet in three separate assemblies.

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    In the second half of 17th century France was an absolute monarchy on the rule of the hereditary monarch, who was the sole source of political power. He ruled with support of the nobility. LOUIS XIV from BOURBON DYNASTY -> ruled France during the late 17th and early 18th century.

  2. Napoleon: Son or Enemy of the Revolution

    To do this he used a device which he became particularly popular in the Second Empire (1852-70): the plebiscite (Lee, 21). Napoleon wanted to get rid of any record that was unpleasant towards him. As a result, he established a severe restriction plan, in which he controlled the media.

  1. History IA -Napoleon

    The working class most likely accounted for 48%5 of the population, and lived in the poorest conditions in France. The bourgeoisie fought for their rights in the Estates General, but were promptly kicked out, and were forced to create a new National Assembly in 17896.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Socialist tendencies increased?attempt on the life of Alexander II, the ?Tsar Liberator? was made.? Karl Watts Alexander II?s Reforms, Causes, and Consequences ?Russian intellectuals interpreted Alexander?s reforms as an attempt to perpetuate the existing political system?half-heated concessions on the part of those who hated to see the disappearance of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work