• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did militarism contribute to the origins of the First World War (19141918)?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Noemie Derhy To what extent did militarism contribute to the origins of the First World War (1914?1918)? Militarism is at the core of the origins of World War I. The concept of militarism is to emphasize on the military aspect of a nation. Although militarism can have advantages and is sometimes a very ?typical? trait of a country, it did not prosper during the World War I, as it reinforced the tensions and didn?t leave room for options other than war. The French army along with the German army had doubled between 1870 and 1914, and there was a huge competition between Britain and Germany for the monopolization of the sea. In fact, from 1910 to 1914, Germany had increased military expenditure by 73%, clearly preparing for war. France for example, had a growing pre-war militarism. Victor Hugo proclaimed that ?France will have but one thought, to reconstitute her forces, gather her energy, nourish her sacred anger, raise her young generation to form an army of the whole people, to work without cease, to study the methods and skills of our enemies, to become again a great France, the France of 1792, the France of an idea with a sword. Then one day she will be irresistible. Then she will take back Alsace-Lorraine.? Since 1890, Germany had led an aggressive foreign policy with the aim of expanding Germany?s borders. ...read more.

Middle

It was definitely one of the biggest causes of World War I, David Stevenson states that it was "a self-reinforcing cycle of heightened military preparedness [...] was an essential element in the conjuncture that led to disaster [...] the armaments race [...] was a necessary precondition for the outbreak of hostilities." The United Kingdom had the biggest and most powerful navy in the world at the time, and the Kaiser was enthusiastic about the expansion of Germany?s naval forces. With the help of Grand Admiral Alfred Von Tirpitz who designed four Fleet Acts from 1898 ? 1912, he set the goal to achieve an expansion of their navy that would represent 2/3 of the British navy. Wilhelm II?s desire to expand his navy was mostly sparked by the aftermath of the Kruger Telegram and the British Foreign Office?s threat to kill the German Economy by blockading the German Coast. The British noticed their expansion and quickly joined the race to keep ahead of the Germans. During the arms race between the two nations, Britain came up with a ship that revolutionized naval power; the HMS Dreadnought encouraged Germany to build something that could match the ship. Nonetheless, by the beginning of World War I Britain had 49 ships in comparison to Germany who only had 29 which is approximately 60%. ...read more.

Conclusion

That is how all the great European joined in. The Treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty that ended the war. It required Germany to bear all the responsibility of the war, and it was impossible to meet all the requirements considering that Germany?s economy was devastated by the loss of the war. All the nations wanted something from Germany, from territorial changed to military restrictions. Alsace and Loraine were regained by the French, the Province of Posen was ceded to Poland, Czechoslovakian gained the Hulltschin area of Upper Silesia, etc. The total sum of reparations demanded to Germany would be US $442 billion by today?s standards. The people of Germany were bathing in poverty and everything had to be taken away from them, giving conditions of desperation that rose to World War II. Every war has more than one cause, but militarism is always at the heart of the problem. Though Germany had indeed a sense of militarism much too strong, it wasn?t correct to impose such large demands in the Treaty of Versailles, as it was not the only nation whose militarism had contributed to the source of conflict. World War I was probably preventable if each nation had eased down the emphasis on military forces, and if their webs of alliances had been less complex, not leading to a domino effect in the end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Why were the central powers defeated in the First World War

    This psychologically destroyed the Germany army. Another vital reason for the central powers were defeated in the First World War was the collapse of Germany's allies. Firstly, was the collapse of Austria-Hungary. Austria-Hungary did well against Italy. However in the end they were defeated by Italy in the battle of Veneto.

  2. To what extent can the origins of the cold war be linked to the ...

    They saw the Marshall Plan to mark US aggressiveness and expansionism. Overall the Post-Revisionist view is correct. The Marshall Plan was aimed to buffer capitalism and gain further control for the US however the Soviet rejection of the plan is entirely understandable as it was for defensive terms.

  1. What Effect Did World War II have on Eastern Europe?

    The cost of owning books was low and many citizens were able to afford to keep their own collection of books in their homes. Disadvantages were that the books were censored and promoted communist ideals. Also, due to severe rationing in all aspects of society, the quality of the printing paper was low and the books easily degraded.

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    --> Berlin stands for freedom and I stand for freedom * Conclusions; a. Berlin in the middle of Eastern Germany had been put under four power occupation in 1945 b. In 1948 -9 the Berlin Blockade crisis concerned not only Berlin but the whole future of Germany and was followed

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Clear possibility of civil war made Lenin realize he would need to make a formal peace with the Germans. German High Command was willing to negotiate as the war had reached a critical point and it would free up troops for the West.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - Following another unclear election in 1988 another National Unity Government was formed. The country was clearly divided abot what to do about the Intifada and the settlements. Labour was prepared to trade land for peace and security, and Likud wanted either the annexation of the territories or at least a massive settlement drive.

  1. The Causes of WW1. First World War caused by MANIA: Militarism - Alliances ...

    Triple entente: UK, France and Russia Settled colonial disputes Recognized Germany as the common enemy No military agreements! Alliances - how important was this as a cause of the war? On the one hand, YES -The alliance systems in Europe escalated the Balkan affair (instability and disputes between A-H and Serbia)

  2. Why did Tsarism fail to survive the first world war

    The backwards economy limited the Russian equipment and the amount of the primitive guns they had, therefore further quickening their destruction, taking away the Tsars enforcing power on the people. Gradually replacing the lost soldiers with peasants, the Tsar named himself commander in chief of the army on the 22 August 1915.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work