• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Germany economically ''modern'' but politically ''backward''?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Germany economically ''modern'' but politically ''backward''? In 1890, statistics show that Germany was undoubtedly economically advanced. However it was also an autocracy under Kaiser Wilhelm II, which may scholars regarded as being a politically backward system. Economically, Germany was quickly becoming an extremely successful industrial nation and its economy was second in the world only to the USA. Between 1879 and 1914 Coal production increased a thrilling 200% and Steel production increased by an amazing 80 fold. Furthermore, by 1914, they were providing for one third of the worlds electrical out-put. There were several reasons for why Germany was so economically modern during this time. ...read more.


The power of the states in the central government was maintained through the Federal Council (Bunestrat). This is a system similar to that of America today, which suggests democracy. In addition, the German parliament (Reichstad) was elected every 5 years by universal manhood suffrage and they had the power to make federal law and had to approve imperial budget. Even the Kaiser could not ignore the Reichstad and had to patch up working majorities in order to pass his legislations. Similarly, the Kaiser did not have full power over Germany because criticism of him was common and he was not in a position to take firm action against it. ...read more.


Even the army took an oath of personal loyalty to the Kaiser rather than to the state, which greatly enforced the authoritarian power he had over Germany. In conclusion, I do agree that Germany was economically ''modern'' because all statistics I have seen confirm this. However, I believe that Germany's political system was greatly backward but not completely because Kaiser Wilhelm did have almost authoritarian control over Germany. However people did criticise him and he could not completely ignore the Reichstad nor the SPD, which challenges how autocratic Germany actually was. Finally, the very definition of ''backward'' is also debatable. I do not believe it is fair to say that autocracy is a backward system and democracy is the right approach because both of these have its flaws. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kari Johannessen 12L Sunday, 30 August 2009 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Nazi Germany

    and realized that Nazis must seize the power through democratic system not by force The Nazis in opposition 1924-1929 Hitler start to rebuilt the Nazi Party - take power through democratic means - youth organisations (In the Reichstag elections in May 1924, the Nazis won 32 seats, encouraged by this

  2. Imperial Germany Revision Notes. Powers and functions were divided between the central, or federal, ...

    Bismarck now introduced a general tariff bill. He addressed the Reichstag in May 1879. � In July 1879 a tariff bill passed through the Reichstag and duties were imposed on imports. The political results were far-reaching. Bismarck had now firmly committed himself to the Conservative camp.

  1. Comparison between the Indus and modern society

    most only somewhat portrays social class by the amount of money you have, and at least with that you can change your situation, unlike those locked in the caste system.

  2. To what extent were the social changes in Germany between 1865 and 1890 the ...

    Background Bismarck was strongly conservative and connected to the monarchy. He did not support democracy at all. His main goal was to make Prussia stronger and he achieved that through the unification of Germany in 1871. Bismarck tried to stop the socialist movement in the country and to reduce the power of the Catholic Church.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work