Commentary on Ode on a Grecian Urn and Ulysses

Authors Avatar

                           

English Commentary

Q7)Exploration of the language and imagery used in the poems 'Ode on a Grecian Urn' by John Keats and 'Ulysses' by Lord Alfred Tennyson.

     'Ode on a Grecian Urn' by John Keats and 'Ulysses' by Lord Alfred Tennyson are both very well written poems. They are intricately written and filled with symbolism and imagery   which enraptures the reader. Keats' 'Ode on a Grecian Urn' is one of the most memorable and enduring of all poems to come from the Romantic Period. The poem is based on a series of paradoxes and opposites. Firstly the  contradiction of the urn filled with dynamic life in spite of its frozen images and the fact that it is made of cold stone. Then, the contrast of the human and changeable with the immortal and permanent and the dispute of whether fantasy is better than reality. All in all it is a comparison of life versus art. Alfred Tennyson's 'Ulysses' is both a lament and an inspiring poem. Everyone has heard about the legendary greatness of Ulysses, however this poem talks about not Ulysses the hero, but Ulysses the man. In the poem Tennyson brings out the agony felt by Ulysses at his old age for being stuck at home instead of out discovering the world. Thus, while doing this his strong words inspire the readers to never stop their quest for knowledge and to live life to the fullest.

   

     The poem 'Ode on a Grecian Urn' is an apostrophe because throughout the poem Keats addresses the urn directly as if it were a living entity. The poem itself is about how the stone urn in spite of being inanimate seems so full of life. Thus, addressing the urn as if were alive was definitely the best way Keats could have gone about writing this poem. There are five stanzas in the poem, consisting of ten lines each. It is metered in a relatively precise iambic pentameter, and divided into a two part rhyme scheme, the last three lines of which are variable. The first seven lines of each stanza have an ABABCDE rhyme scheme but the last three lines have variables of CDE. The two part rhyme scheme, the first part consisting of the AB rhymes and the second of the CDE rhymes, divides the stanzas thematically as well, with the first part roughly describing the subject of the stanza and the second developing the idea.

 

    Keats starts the poem by comparing the urn to a 'still unravished bride'. At first any reader would find this a strange comparison, but after reading on, one realizes that it is in fact apt. It prepares us for the impossibility of fulfillment that Keats sees depicted on the urn in the second stanza and also perhaps symbolizes how unaffected the urn is by the ravages of time. There is a pun on the word 'still', as it embodies both the concept of time and motion. In the next line the urn is described to be a 'foster child' of 'silence' and 'slow time'; which possibly referred to the museum because 'silence' and 'slow time' are both found in a museum and also the urn was now in the care of the museum. A sylvan historian records scenes in the woods and thus since the scenes depicted on the urn are set in the woods, that is what the urn is compared to next. Keats goes on to say that the tales told by the urn are 'sweeter than a rhyme'. This is a paradox because the urn is in fact absolutely silent. In the last six lines of the stanza Keats begins to talk about the pictures on the urn with an awed tone. He is enraptured by the passionate and exhilarating activities depicted on the urn and instead of being merely an observer he becomes a participant in the life of the urn, that is, he becomes emotionally involved. Again this is another paradox as life and passion is convincingly portrayed on cold, hard stone.

Join now!

     The first four lines of the second stanza contrast fantasy and reality; and at this time it seems that Keats prefers fantasy. This is shown by the oxymoron of Keats believing that unheard melodies are sweeter than those which are heard, and so the tale about the ideal, fantasy world told soundlessly by the paintings on the urn is sweeter than any real-life tales. From line 15-20 Keats seems to be listing the drawbacks of frozen time and he keeps using negative phrases like 'canst not leave', 'nor ever can' and 'never,never canst', but then ...

This is a preview of the whole essay