• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nature of Sympathy in Anna Karenina

Extracts from this document...


The nature of sympathy dictates that for any close understanding of another's feelings to prevail it must stem from an empathic concern for the individual in question; that is to say: sympathy isn't universally applied. To be able to enjoy an emotional understanding of another person you must first find them to be somehow worthy of your sympathy, and this principle applies also to the act of sympathizing with a character in a book - especially in a work of realistic fiction such as Tolstoy's Anna Karenina. The novel's co-protagonist Constantine Levin and his close friend, the urban aristocrat Stepan "Stiva" Oblonsky are pivotal characters in Tolstoy's epic, but whether both are worthy of sympathy and furthermore just how Tolstoy formulated them to be so is open to debate. I would suggest that through deliberate conception of the characters' motivations, experiences and ultimate character progression (or lack thereof), Levin is established as someone the reader can easily sympathize with while Stiva is unrelatable and worthy instead of the reader's disdain. Through the adversities the two characters face and the inclusion of details of their reactions, there is evidence to suggest that Tolstoy very deliberately established Levin as deserving more respect than Oblonsky. This idea can be clearly illustrated through the comparison of two minor events in the novel, those of the aftermath of Oblonksy's infidelity and Levin's jealousy over Veslovsky's flirtation with Kitty. ...read more.


Levin is consistently focused toward goals larger than his person, and in his endeavors is portrayed with a sincerity and vulnerability with which he views and interacts with his surroundings. This quality is exemplified within Levin by his career choice: farming, which is typical of country life and predominantly concerned with the care and maintenance of something bigger than oneself (the land). Oblonsky, on the other hand, is an emblematic Russian aristocrat, concerned primarily with dinner parties, women, and leisure activities. Effectively, Oblonksy is representative of the corrupting nature of city living - his pleasure seeking has perverted his good nature, and he is preoccupied with the satisfying his base urges regardless of the damaging effect it may have on the world and people around him. This is echoed in his prolonged neglect of Dolly, and his unwitting devaluation of Russian forest resources in the pursuit of easy capital. Any superficially considerate acts on his behalf are executed with an emotional vapidity (attempting to resolve the situation between Karenin and the estranged Anna and proceeding to think of jokes with which to amuse his drinking companions) that serves to dispel any reader compassion toward him. The two characters are described as two sides of a coin, one conscientious and spiritual, the other self-obsessed and frivolous - reader sympathy is directed accordingly. ...read more.


than the other. Throughout the novel, Levin is portrayed as being on a quest for meaning, beginning with his attempted reform of Russian agricultural practices, and culminating in his final sincere belief in God and His power. All of his growth and character progression is detailed, establishing between the reader and Levin an understanding bordering on affection and resulting in an empathic concern - a prerequisite for sympathy. Oblonksy's character is in stark contrast to this - he is consistently unchanging, remaining essentially the same character from his initial domestic disputes to when we see him in the novel's closing pages, picnicking with Levin and their respective families. What the reader begins to see is that Oblonsky is less of a fully-fledged character worthy of sympathy and more of a constant by which other character's developments can be gauged by. Essentially, I feel that the reason that it is easier for a reader to sympathize with Levin over Oblonsky is that the two characters were deliberately created to achieve this effect, through Tolstoy's meticulous rendering of their specific character traits and their individual roles within the novel. Both are hugely significant, and serve important functions within Anna Karenina, but ultimately reader sympathy is inclined to lie with the more relatable and humane of the two. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Languages section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Languages essays

  1. Fasting Feasting by Anita Desai Detailed Study Notes

    She was treated like a servant by her mother-in-law, who 'beat her regularly' and made Anamika do the 'scrubbing or cooking' and 'massage' her feet. Yet, Anamika remained subservient despite her intelligence, because Desai uses her to represent the female population that follow Indian tradition, who believe the role of

  2. Under age Binge Drinking In Wales

    Alcohol in large doses is a neurotoxic substance it causes lack of co-ordination, blurred or double vision, hypoglycaemia, fits, depressed reflexes, respiratory depression, coma and death can occur due to respiratory or circulatory failure or as a result to choking on stomach contents as there is no gag reflex.

  1. Hamlet ACT I Scene I:1

    around to do so by expressing that it is "Saint Valentine's day" He promises her an up in status so he will kill Hamlet. � Scene VI Deus ex machine: the pirates allow Hamlet's sudden return; he tells Horatio to give the letters to the king.

  2. Lord Of the Flies: Progression of Evil

    Golding further shows Piggy's exclusion and uniqueness by making him the only boy whose hair does not grow longer. Long, messy hair is a trademark of savage appearance and the fact that Piggy's hair seems to resist this degradation despite the fact that the majority of boys around him are,

  1. Commentary on Aftermath by Sassoon

    Apart from that, there is an irregular pattern in the length of the stanzas and in the number of stresses on each line. The lack of structure reiterates the absence of security and steadiness, which is also a furtive indication implying that the re-entry into civility after war is very

  2. Vietnamese Poetry and Language

    The� la� �u�, ra�t �u�. To�i ga�p co� ta trong h�nh a�nh a�y. Tha�ng ba�n gia� gi�i thie�u trong mo�t qua�n a�n ha�ng sang: - �an Thanh. No� kho�ng gi�i thie�u nghe� nghie�p, ma� to�i ca�n qua�i g� bie�t �e�n nghe� nghie�p, ca�n qua�i g� qu�a kh��.

  1. Dorian Gray's Defining Name

    I am not going to do anymore. I began my good actions yesterday", a clear demonstration of how Dorian strives for salvation, an effort ended when Dorian discovers that it is too late to recover his vile actions. The lack of moral definition of the word gray is predominantly represented in the novel through Dorian's superficial ways

  2. Anna Karenina and Hester Prynne

    Anna Karenina expresses distinctiveness in the scene where Dolly comes to visit her at the country house. Dolly is astonished by Anna's freedom by riding horseback, which society considers improper for ladies. As Hester, Anna is against the rules that society has created and subsequently she lives a non-conformist life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work