• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

LACSAP FRACTIONS - I will begin my investigation by continuing the pattern and finding the numerator of the sixth row.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

LACSAP’S FRACTIONS


The purpose of my investigation will be to achieve the general statement for a set of numbers that are presented in a symmetrical pattern.

Looking at the pattern below I will begin my investigation by continuing the pattern and finding the numerator of the sixth row.

image15.png

Observing this pattern the first thing I noticed was the value of the numerator is consistent in each row and I began to notice a pattern forming in diagonal lines. I noticed that the numerator would increase by a value that would increase by 1 in each row. For example looking at the example below:

image16.png

Therefore I can conclude that the numerator value for the sixth row will be 21.

After continueing the pattern into the sixth row, to further my investigation I will write a general statement which will present the numerator. In order to find the general statement firstly I will plot the relation betwen the row number (n) and the numerator value in each row.

After considering the graph and the pattern in which the numerator value was increasing I came to the realization that the pattern was an arithmetic sequence. Therefore I was able to arrive at the general statement by simplifying the formula for an arithmetic sequence. Where U1 is equal to 1 and d is equal to 1.

Sn = image00.png

 ( 2u1 + (n – 1)d)

...read more.

Middle

N/A

3

0

4

3

5

6

6

9

7

12

Again, since there is no third element in rows 1 and 2 the difference is not applicable. The difference this time increases by 3 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 3(n-3).

Row number (r = 4)

Difference of Numerator and Denominator

1

N/A

2

N/A

3

N/A

4

0

5

4

6

8

7

12

Again, since there is no fourth element in rows 1,2 and 3 the difference is not applicable. The differecen this time increases by 4 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 4(n-4).

Row number (r = 5)

Difference of Numerator and Denominator

1

N/A

2

N/A

3

N/A

4

N/A

5

0

6

5

7

10

 For this table rows 1,2,3 and four aren’t applicable because there is no fifth element in those rows. The difference this time increases by 5 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 5(n-5).

Looking at these tables it becomes obvious that the difference between numerator and denominator increases by the r value. Thus I was able to conclude that the general statement much be something along the lines of 0.5n2 + 0.5n – (difference of Numerator and Denominator). Looking at the data I have gathered above I have come to the conclusion that the general statement must be…..

                               Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

Now that I have come up with my general statement I will test its validity to make sure it works.

Test validity for when denominator = 7, n = 4 and r=3

Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

7 = (0.5(4)2 + 0.5(4)) – 3(4 – 3)

7 = (0.5(16) + 2) – 3(1)

7 = (8 + 2) – 3

7 = 10 – 3

7 = 7

Test validity for when denominator = 18, n = 7, r = 5

Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

18 = (0.5(7)2 + 0.5(7)) – 5(7 – 5)

18 = (0.5(49) + 3.5) – 5(2)

18 = (24.5 + 3.5) – 10

18 = 28 – 10

18 = 18  

Now that I have arrived at a general statement for both the numerator and denominator individually, the next step in my investigation would be to find the general statement which represents both the numerator and denominator of an element simultaneously. By letting the element be represented by En(r) where n represents the row number and r represents the element in each row. By combining the general statements for both the numerator and denominator the general statement I have come up with is……

En(r) = image01.png

Now that I have come up with the general statement I will test its validity to make sure my statement is valid.

Test validity for when En(r) = image02.png

  and n = 3 and r = 1

En(r) = image01.png

image02.png

 = image03.png

image02.png

= image04.png

image02.png

= image05.png

image02.png

= image02.png

Test validity for when  n = 10 and r = 6 however since I have not extended my pattern into the 10th row I will extend my pattern in the 10th row for the 6th element in order to figure what the En(r) value will be. Then I will use my general statement to test its validity.  

Row Number (n)

Numerator

2

1+2 = 3

3

3+3 = 6

4

6+4 = 10

5

10+5 = 15

6

15+6 = 21

7

21+7 = 28

8

28+8 = 36

9

36+9 = 45

10

45+10 = 55

...read more.

Conclusion

Row Number (n)

Numerator

2

1+2 = 3

3

3+3 = 6

4

6+4 = 10

5

10+5 = 15

6

15+6 = 21

7

21+7 = 28

8

28+8 = 36

9

36+9 = 45

10

45+10 = 55

11

55+11 = 66

12

66+12 = 78

Numerator = 78

Row number (r = 3)

Denominator

1

N/A

2

N/A

3

6

4

6+1 = 7

5

7+2 = 9

6

9+3 = 12

7

12+4 = 16

8

16+5 = 21

9

21+6 = 27

10

27+7 = 34

11

34+8 = 42

12

42+9 = 51

Denominator = 51

 En(r) = image10.png

Test general statement validity:

En(r) = image01.png

image10.png

 = image11.png

image10.png

 = image12.png

image10.png

 = image13.png

image14.png

 = image14.png

After testing the validity of my general statement I have come to the conclusion that my statement is valid for all the number I have tested. However there are some limitations to my general statement, regarding the variable I am using. Firstly n must be a whole number because there needs to be an entire row to complete the pattern, you cannot have part of the row, n must also be greater than zero because there can’t be a negative row in the pattern. The same limitations apply to r, which must be greater than zero and a whole number because there cannot be a negative or partial element in the pattern.  

I was able to arrive at my general statement by considering patterns for both the denominator and numerator separately. This helped me focus on smaller parts of the final general statement and enabled me to notice all the different patterns that were forming within the lacsap fractions. By only focusing on one part of the fraction, coming up with a general statement for the numerator and denominator became very simple and straight forward. With those two general statements, I was later able to collaborate them together and arrive at a general statement for the entire fraction.

 | Page

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. Stellar Numbers. In this task geometric shapes which lead to special numbers ...

    37.5 54 Difference between Sequence and n2 1 2.5 4 5.5 7 8.5 10 Second difference This second difference tells me the value for 'b' which is equal to . To find the value of 'c' I will use the previous methods: Using n=2: n2 + n + c = 10 (2)2 + (2)

  2. Lacsap's Fractions : Internal Assessment

    Since the first row only consisted of "1", and hence the"1" was discarded from calculations, the general equation cannot be used to calculate the elements in the first row.

  1. Continued Fractions

    When the value of N is still below 15, it oscillates between values which sometimes range from negative to positive values, but then as the value of N increases it will converge to a constant specific positive value. In that case, N could only be a negative value if <15 4.

  2. This essay will examine theoretical and experimental probability in relation to the Korean card ...

    Diagram 2. Example of 3-8 Guang-Ddaeng Guang-Ddaeng is when a player gets January and March or January and August card with ?. Diagram 3,4. Examples of Guang-Ddaeng Ddaeng is when a player gets any same months, October is highest and January is lowest.

  1. Parabola investigation. The property that was investigated was the relationship between the parabola and ...

    Now the conjecture can be tested. Here is how it was tested. Find the value of D with the conjecture. The formula 7.14 - ( (a-1.12)0.01×0.06) is used. So here is how it is done 7.14 - ( (1.28-1.12)0.01×0.06) = 6.18 = x Now find y by the formula a-1.230.01

  2. MATH Lacsap's Fractions IA

    5 15 Graph 1: Row number against numerator with a linear trendline Graph 2: Row number against numerator with an exponential trendline Graph 3: Row number against numerator with a polynomial trendline Out of the three trendlines used to represent data from Table 2, the polynomial function is the best-fit model.

  1. Math IA type I. Here is Lacsaps Fractions (the symmetrical pattern given) from ...

    When you add 1 to 3, the result is 4; find n=4 in Pascal?s Triangle and find column 2.

  2. The purpose of this investigation is to explore the various properties and concepts of ...

    V W X Y Z 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 First, the following alphanumeric system was chosen. Note that the corresponding digits are not merely a direct substitution in order of letters, but instead, we can rearrange the corresponding digits in some pattern or random order.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work