• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

LACSAP FRACTIONS - I will begin my investigation by continuing the pattern and finding the numerator of the sixth row.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

LACSAP’S FRACTIONS


The purpose of my investigation will be to achieve the general statement for a set of numbers that are presented in a symmetrical pattern.

Looking at the pattern below I will begin my investigation by continuing the pattern and finding the numerator of the sixth row.

image15.png

Observing this pattern the first thing I noticed was the value of the numerator is consistent in each row and I began to notice a pattern forming in diagonal lines. I noticed that the numerator would increase by a value that would increase by 1 in each row. For example looking at the example below:

image16.png

Therefore I can conclude that the numerator value for the sixth row will be 21.

After continueing the pattern into the sixth row, to further my investigation I will write a general statement which will present the numerator. In order to find the general statement firstly I will plot the relation betwen the row number (n) and the numerator value in each row.

After considering the graph and the pattern in which the numerator value was increasing I came to the realization that the pattern was an arithmetic sequence. Therefore I was able to arrive at the general statement by simplifying the formula for an arithmetic sequence. Where U1 is equal to 1 and d is equal to 1.

Sn = image00.png

 ( 2u1 + (n – 1)d)

...read more.

Middle

N/A

3

0

4

3

5

6

6

9

7

12

Again, since there is no third element in rows 1 and 2 the difference is not applicable. The difference this time increases by 3 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 3(n-3).

Row number (r = 4)

Difference of Numerator and Denominator

1

N/A

2

N/A

3

N/A

4

0

5

4

6

8

7

12

Again, since there is no fourth element in rows 1,2 and 3 the difference is not applicable. The differecen this time increases by 4 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 4(n-4).

Row number (r = 5)

Difference of Numerator and Denominator

1

N/A

2

N/A

3

N/A

4

N/A

5

0

6

5

7

10

 For this table rows 1,2,3 and four aren’t applicable because there is no fifth element in those rows. The difference this time increases by 5 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 5(n-5).

Looking at these tables it becomes obvious that the difference between numerator and denominator increases by the r value. Thus I was able to conclude that the general statement much be something along the lines of 0.5n2 + 0.5n – (difference of Numerator and Denominator). Looking at the data I have gathered above I have come to the conclusion that the general statement must be…..

                               Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

Now that I have come up with my general statement I will test its validity to make sure it works.

Test validity for when denominator = 7, n = 4 and r=3

Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

7 = (0.5(4)2 + 0.5(4)) – 3(4 – 3)

7 = (0.5(16) + 2) – 3(1)

7 = (8 + 2) – 3

7 = 10 – 3

7 = 7

Test validity for when denominator = 18, n = 7, r = 5

Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

18 = (0.5(7)2 + 0.5(7)) – 5(7 – 5)

18 = (0.5(49) + 3.5) – 5(2)

18 = (24.5 + 3.5) – 10

18 = 28 – 10

18 = 18  

Now that I have arrived at a general statement for both the numerator and denominator individually, the next step in my investigation would be to find the general statement which represents both the numerator and denominator of an element simultaneously. By letting the element be represented by En(r) where n represents the row number and r represents the element in each row. By combining the general statements for both the numerator and denominator the general statement I have come up with is……

En(r) = image01.png

Now that I have come up with the general statement I will test its validity to make sure my statement is valid.

Test validity for when En(r) = image02.png

  and n = 3 and r = 1

En(r) = image01.png

image02.png

 = image03.png

image02.png

= image04.png

image02.png

= image05.png

image02.png

= image02.png

Test validity for when  n = 10 and r = 6 however since I have not extended my pattern into the 10th row I will extend my pattern in the 10th row for the 6th element in order to figure what the En(r) value will be. Then I will use my general statement to test its validity.  

Row Number (n)

Numerator

2

1+2 = 3

3

3+3 = 6

4

6+4 = 10

5

10+5 = 15

6

15+6 = 21

7

21+7 = 28

8

28+8 = 36

9

36+9 = 45

10

45+10 = 55

...read more.

Conclusion

Row Number (n)

Numerator

2

1+2 = 3

3

3+3 = 6

4

6+4 = 10

5

10+5 = 15

6

15+6 = 21

7

21+7 = 28

8

28+8 = 36

9

36+9 = 45

10

45+10 = 55

11

55+11 = 66

12

66+12 = 78

Numerator = 78

Row number (r = 3)

Denominator

1

N/A

2

N/A

3

6

4

6+1 = 7

5

7+2 = 9

6

9+3 = 12

7

12+4 = 16

8

16+5 = 21

9

21+6 = 27

10

27+7 = 34

11

34+8 = 42

12

42+9 = 51

Denominator = 51

 En(r) = image10.png

Test general statement validity:

En(r) = image01.png

image10.png

 = image11.png

image10.png

 = image12.png

image10.png

 = image13.png

image14.png

 = image14.png

After testing the validity of my general statement I have come to the conclusion that my statement is valid for all the number I have tested. However there are some limitations to my general statement, regarding the variable I am using. Firstly n must be a whole number because there needs to be an entire row to complete the pattern, you cannot have part of the row, n must also be greater than zero because there can’t be a negative row in the pattern. The same limitations apply to r, which must be greater than zero and a whole number because there cannot be a negative or partial element in the pattern.  

I was able to arrive at my general statement by considering patterns for both the denominator and numerator separately. This helped me focus on smaller parts of the final general statement and enabled me to notice all the different patterns that were forming within the lacsap fractions. By only focusing on one part of the fraction, coming up with a general statement for the numerator and denominator became very simple and straight forward. With those two general statements, I was later able to collaborate them together and arrive at a general statement for the entire fraction.

 | Page

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. parabola investigation

    When I worked with lines which had one difference in their slopes, my conjecture worked, however it doesn't seem to be working with the lines y= 2x and y=4x. It is obvious that I must modify my conjecture in order to involve slope differences of the lines.

  2. Salida del sol en NY

    15,00 5,40 35,00 5,27 16,00 5,52 36,00 5,10 17,00 5,63 37,00 4,93 18,00 5,75 38,00 4,78 19,00 5,87 39,00 4,67 20,00 5,98 40,00 La tabla nos sugiere que el suceso se repetir� consecutivamente cada a�o, con lo que nosotros podremos intuir en base al comportamiento de los datos que la

  1. Continued Fractions

    Pursuant to the table in question two, the exact value for the continued fraction is 2.414213562 because as the value of increases, the continued fraction's value converges into 2.414213562 and it remains constant as long as 14. Considering the general continued fraction: Determine a generalized statement for the exact value of any such continued fraction.

  2. MATH Lacsap's Fractions IA

    Finding the general statement for denominators After finding the numerator values and the general statement for it, we also have to find a general pattern statement for the denominator values. The given triangle in Figure 1 is symmetrical. This means that the numbers on the left are identical to the ones on the right.

  1. LACSAP Fractions. The aim of this portfolio is to discover an equation which ...

    To Find the Eighth Row: Numerator: = 8(+ ) = 36 1st denominator: = (8) × (8+1) - 1(8-1) = 36 – 7 = 29 2nd denominator: = (8) × (8+2) - 1(8-2) = 36 – 12 = 24 3rd denominator: = (8) × (8+1) - 3(8-3) = 36 – 15 = 21 4th denominator: = (8) × (8+1)

  2. Math IA type I. Here is Lacsaps Fractions (the symmetrical pattern given) from ...

    Therefore I will go past 1st differences and look at 2nd differences to determine whether or not this is a quadratic equation. Numerator 1st Differences 2nd Differences 1 2 1 3 3 1 6 4 1 10 5 1 15 Since the second differences are the same, I am able to understand that this is a quadratic equation.

  1. Lacsaps fractions are an arrangement of numbers that are symmetrically repeating based on a ...

    see there is a geometric between the row number and the numerator. With increasing row number increases the value of k increase by for each individual row, as illustrated in table 2. From this one can identify that if k would be doubled then it would be equal to the

  2. Lascap's Fractions. I was able to derive a general statement for both the ...

    Now I will test the validity of the general statement by finding the 8th, 9th and 10th rows using the general statement found earlier. 8th row numerator: 9th row numerator: 10th row numerator: 8th row denominators 1st and 7th denominators 2nd and 6th denominators 3rd and 5th denominators 4th denominator

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work