• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10

# LACSAP FRACTIONS - I will begin my investigation by continuing the pattern and finding the numerator of the sixth row.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

 LACSAP’S FRACTIONS

The purpose of my investigation will be to achieve the general statement for a set of numbers that are presented in a symmetrical pattern.

Looking at the pattern below I will begin my investigation by continuing the pattern and finding the numerator of the sixth row.

Observing this pattern the first thing I noticed was the value of the numerator is consistent in each row and I began to notice a pattern forming in diagonal lines. I noticed that the numerator would increase by a value that would increase by 1 in each row. For example looking at the example below:

Therefore I can conclude that the numerator value for the sixth row will be 21.

After continueing the pattern into the sixth row, to further my investigation I will write a general statement which will present the numerator. In order to find the general statement firstly I will plot the relation betwen the row number (n) and the numerator value in each row.

After considering the graph and the pattern in which the numerator value was increasing I came to the realization that the pattern was an arithmetic sequence. Therefore I was able to arrive at the general statement by simplifying the formula for an arithmetic sequence. Where U1 is equal to 1 and d is equal to 1.

Sn =

( 2u1 + (n – 1)d)

Middle

N/A

3

0

4

3

5

6

6

9

7

12

Again, since there is no third element in rows 1 and 2 the difference is not applicable. The difference this time increases by 3 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 3(n-3).

 Row number (r = 4) Difference of Numerator and Denominator 1 N/A 2 N/A 3 N/A 4 0 5 4 6 8 7 12

Again, since there is no fourth element in rows 1,2 and 3 the difference is not applicable. The differecen this time increases by 4 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 4(n-4).

 Row number (r = 5) Difference of Numerator and Denominator 1 N/A 2 N/A 3 N/A 4 N/A 5 0 6 5 7 10

For this table rows 1,2,3 and four aren’t applicable because there is no fifth element in those rows. The difference this time increases by 5 each time and therefore the difference can be stated as 5(n-5).

Looking at these tables it becomes obvious that the difference between numerator and denominator increases by the r value. Thus I was able to conclude that the general statement much be something along the lines of 0.5n2 + 0.5n – (difference of Numerator and Denominator). Looking at the data I have gathered above I have come to the conclusion that the general statement must be…..

Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

Now that I have come up with my general statement I will test its validity to make sure it works.

Test validity for when denominator = 7, n = 4 and r=3

Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

7 = (0.5(4)2 + 0.5(4)) – 3(4 – 3)

7 = (0.5(16) + 2) – 3(1)

7 = (8 + 2) – 3

7 = 10 – 3

7 = 7

Test validity for when denominator = 18, n = 7, r = 5

Denominator = (0.5n2 + 0.5n) – r(n – r)

18 = (0.5(7)2 + 0.5(7)) – 5(7 – 5)

18 = (0.5(49) + 3.5) – 5(2)

18 = (24.5 + 3.5) – 10

18 = 28 – 10

18 = 18

Now that I have arrived at a general statement for both the numerator and denominator individually, the next step in my investigation would be to find the general statement which represents both the numerator and denominator of an element simultaneously. By letting the element be represented by En(r) where n represents the row number and r represents the element in each row. By combining the general statements for both the numerator and denominator the general statement I have come up with is……

En(r) =

Now that I have come up with the general statement I will test its validity to make sure my statement is valid.

Test validity for when En(r) =

and n = 3 and r = 1

En(r) =

=

=

=

=

Test validity for when  n = 10 and r = 6 however since I have not extended my pattern into the 10th row I will extend my pattern in the 10th row for the 6th element in order to figure what the En(r) value will be. Then I will use my general statement to test its validity.

 Row Number (n) Numerator 2 1+2 = 3 3 3+3 = 6 4 6+4 = 10 5 10+5 = 15 6 15+6 = 21 7 21+7 = 28 8 28+8 = 36 9 36+9 = 45 10 45+10 = 55

Conclusion

 Row Number (n) Numerator 2 1+2 = 3 3 3+3 = 6 4 6+4 = 10 5 10+5 = 15 6 15+6 = 21 7 21+7 = 28 8 28+8 = 36 9 36+9 = 45 10 45+10 = 55 11 55+11 = 66 12 66+12 = 78

Numerator = 78

 Row number (r = 3) Denominator 1 N/A 2 N/A 3 6 4 6+1 = 7 5 7+2 = 9 6 9+3 = 12 7 12+4 = 16 8 16+5 = 21 9 21+6 = 27 10 27+7 = 34 11 34+8 = 42 12 42+9 = 51

Denominator = 51

En(r) =

Test general statement validity:

En(r) =

=

=

=

=

After testing the validity of my general statement I have come to the conclusion that my statement is valid for all the number I have tested. However there are some limitations to my general statement, regarding the variable I am using. Firstly n must be a whole number because there needs to be an entire row to complete the pattern, you cannot have part of the row, n must also be greater than zero because there can’t be a negative row in the pattern. The same limitations apply to r, which must be greater than zero and a whole number because there cannot be a negative or partial element in the pattern.

I was able to arrive at my general statement by considering patterns for both the denominator and numerator separately. This helped me focus on smaller parts of the final general statement and enabled me to notice all the different patterns that were forming within the lacsap fractions. By only focusing on one part of the fraction, coming up with a general statement for the numerator and denominator became very simple and straight forward. With those two general statements, I was later able to collaborate them together and arrive at a general statement for the entire fraction.

| Page

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

1. ## parabola investigation

* X1 : 1.26 X2: 1.76 1.76- 1.26 =0.5= SL X3: 6.24 X4: 8.72 8.74 - 6.24 = 2.5 = SR D = 2.5- 0.5 = 2.0 * According to my conjecture D must have been equal to 1 but it is 2 in this case .

2. ## Continued Fractions

The point where it converges and remains constant is the exact value of the continued fraction. This statement only holds true if and is an integer. Observe the table below. n tn when k=0 tn when k=100 tn when k=200 1 1 100.009901 200.0049751 2 1 100.009999 200.0049999 3 1

1. ## Math Investigation - Properties of Quartics

Simplify this ratio so that PQ = 1 and comment upon your results. The ratio PQ: QR: RS found in Question 2 is - 1: 2: To make PQ = 1, divide the other two ratios by PQ PQ: QR: RS = Thus, we can conclude that PQ = RS

2. ## This essay will examine theoretical and experimental probability in relation to the Korean card ...

Graph 3. Tree Diagram of Ddang-8 P(1) = (2/20) x (2/19) x (1/18) x (16/17) = 16/29070 P(2) = (2/20) x (2/19) x (1/18) x (16/17) = 16/29070 P(3) = (2/20) x (2/19) x (1/18) x (16/17) = 16/29070 P(4) = (2/20) x (12/19) x (1/18) x (17/17) = 1/285 P(all) = (16/29070) + (16/29070) + (16/29070) + (1/285)

1. ## MATH Lacsap's Fractions IA

Finding the general statement for denominators After finding the numerator values and the general statement for it, we also have to find a general pattern statement for the denominator values. The given triangle in Figure 1 is symmetrical. This means that the numbers on the left are identical to the ones on the right.

2. ## The purpose of this investigation is to explore the various properties and concepts of ...

Notice that the two elements are blank*. To fix this, ?dummy? letters will be placed into the packets at random only to complete all packets to 4x1 matrices. Z, digit 25*, was positioned in places of empty elements at random.

1. ## LACSAP Fractions. The aim of this portfolio is to discover an equation which ...

To Find the Eighth Row: Numerator: = 8(+ ) = 36 1st denominator: = (8) × (8+1) - 1(8-1) = 36 – 7 = 29 2nd denominator: = (8) × (8+2) - 1(8-2) = 36 – 12 = 24 3rd denominator: = (8) × (8+1) - 3(8-3) = 36 – 15 = 21 4th denominator: = (8) × (8+1)

2. ## Math IA type I. Here is Lacsaps Fractions (the symmetrical pattern given) from ...

Therefore I will go past 1st differences and look at 2nd differences to determine whether or not this is a quadratic equation. Numerator 1st Differences 2nd Differences 1 2 1 3 3 1 6 4 1 10 5 1 15 Since the second differences are the same, I am able to understand that this is a quadratic equation.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to