• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

Pendulum Lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Surface Area and the Period of a Pendulum        Raphael Hanna

IB HL Chemistry (Surface Area and the Period of a Pendulum)

Submitted to: Ms. Fronczak

Submitted by: Raphael Hanna

Date: February 17, 2009

Course: SCH3UC

Design

Question:

How will varying the surface area of the bob affect the period of a pendulum?

Independent and Dependant Variables:

The surface area of the bob was varied by melting chocolate into different shaped blocks with the same volume. The resulting effect on the period of the pendulum was measured. The independent variable in the experiment was the surface area of the chocolate blocks and the dependant variable was the period of the pendulum.

Controlled Variables:

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of surface area on the period of a pendulum. This was does by varying the surface area of several blocks of chocolate and then measuring the period of the pendulum. Several variables however, can alter the results of this experiment.

Controlled variables:

Pivot point- The type of pivot point could affect how the pendulum swings by increasing the friction and changing the velocity of the pendulum. In this experiment the type of pivot point was kept constant throughout the experiment

Length of the string- The length of the string will vary the arc on the pendulum and the period as a result will change.

...read more.

Middle

Trial Number

Time(s) needed to complete subsequent number of periods

1 period

5 periods

6  periods

10  periods

Trial 1

1.0s(±0.1s)

6.5s(±0.1s)

7.99s(±0.1s)

13.64s(±0.1s)

Trial 2

1.0s(±0.1s)

6.6s(±0.1s)

8.15s(±0.1s)

13.50s(±0.1s)

Trial 3

1.1s(±0.1s)

6.6s(±0.1s)

8.18s(±0.1s)

13.54s(±0.1s)

Trial 4

1.2s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.04s(±0.1s)

13.69s(±0.1s)

Trial 5

1.2s(±0.1s)

6.5s(±0.1s)

7.07s(±0.1s)

13.57s(±0.1s)

Test Bob #2

Dimensions: 2cm x 2cm x 3cm                 Dimensions of affected sides: 2cm x 3cm and 2cm x 2cm

Chart 2: The time in seconds needed to complete the allotted number of periods.

Trial Number

Time(s) needed to complete subsequent number of periods

1 period

5 periods

6  periods

10  periods

Trial 1

0.9s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.31s(±0.1s)

13.74s(±0.1s)

Trial 2

1.0s(±0.1s)

6.9s(±0.1s)

8.29s(±0.1s)

13.90s(±0.1s)

Trial 3

0.9s(±0.1s)

6.6s(±0.1s)

8.18s(±0.1s)

13.85s(±0.1s)

Trial 4

0.8s(±0.1s)

6.7s(±0.1s)

8.28s(±0.1s)

13.87s(±0.1s)

Trial 5

1.2s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.32s(±0.1s)

13.84s(±0.1s)

Test Bob #3

Dimensions: 1cm x 3cm x 4cm                 Dimensions of affected sides: 3cm x 4cm and 1cm x 3cm

Chart 3: The time in seconds needed to complete the allotted number of periods.

Trial Number

Time(s) needed to complete subsequent number of periods

1 period

5 periods

6  periods

10  periods

Trial 1

1.2s(±0.1s)

6.7s(±0.1s)

8.18s(±0.1s)

13.75s(±0.1s)

Trial 2

0.8s(±0.1s)

7.0s(±0.1s)

8.19s(±0.1s)

13.72s(±0.1s)

Trial 3

1.1s(±0.1s)

7.0s(±0.1s)

8.13s(±0.1s)

13.56s(±0.1s)

Trial 4

1.2s(±0.1s)

6.6s(±0.1s)

8.15s(±0.1s)

13.59s(±0.1s)

Trial 5

1.1s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.01s(±0.1s)

13.74s(±0.1s)

Test Bob #4

Dimensions: 1.5cm x 2cm x 4cm        Dimensions of affected sides: 1.5cm x 2cm and 2cm x 4cm

Chart 4: The time in seconds needed to complete the allotted number of periods.

Trial Number

Time(s) needed to complete subsequent number of periods

1 period

5 periods

6  periods

10  periods

Trial 1

1.1s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.04s(±0.1s)

13.69s(±0.1s)

Trial 2

1.1s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.29s(±0.1s)

13.73s(±0.1s)

Trial 3

1.1s(±0.1s)

6.7s(±0.1s)

8.04s(±0.1s)

13.70s(±0.1s)

Trial 4

1.2s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.15s(±0.1s)

13.84s(±0.1s)

Trial 5

1.2s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

8.19s(±0.1s)

13.73s(±0.1s)

Test Bob #5

Dimensions: 1cm x 1.5cm x 8cm           Dimensions of affected sides: 1cm x 1.5cm and 1.5cm x 8cm

Chart 5: The time in seconds needed to complete the allotted number of periods.

Trial Number

Time(s) needed to complete subsequent number of periods

1 period

5 periods

6  periods

10  periods

Trial 1

1.1s(±0.1s)

6.8s(±0.1s)

7.89s(±0.1s)

13.43s(±0.1s)

Trial 2

1.4s(±0.1s)

6.5s(±0.1s)

8.02s(±0.1s)

13.53s(±0.1s)

Trial 3

1.0s(±0.1s)

6.6s(±0.1s)

8.16s(±0.1s)

13.23s(±0.1s)

Trial 4

1.0s(±0.1s)

6.7s(±0.1s)

8.04s(±0.1s)

13.51s(±0.1s)

Trial 5

1.1s(±0.1s)

6.7s(±0.1s)

8.03s(±0.1s)

13.46s(±0.1s)

...read more.

Conclusion

Test Bob#2: Dimensions: 2cm x 2cm x 3cm

image19.png

image17.pngAverage for 1 period is 1.0s(±0.5s), 5 period is 6.8s(±0.5s), 6 period is 8.3s(±0.5s), 10 period is 13.8s(±0.5s).’

Test Bob#3: Dimensions: 1cm x 3cm x 4cm

image20.png

image17.pngAverage for 1 period is 1.1s(±0.5s), 5 period is 6.8s(±0.5s), 6 period is 8.1s(±0.5s), 10 period is 13.7s(±0.5s).

Test Bob#4: Dimensions: 1.5cm x 2cm x 4cm

image21.png

image17.pngAverage for 1 period is 1.1s(±0.5s), 5 period is 6.8s(±0.5s), 6 period is 8.1s(±0.5s), 10 period is 13.7s(±0.5s).

Test Bob#5: Dimensions: 1cm x 1.5cm x 8cm

image22.png

image17.pngAverage for 1 period is 1.1s(±0.5s), 5 period is 6.7s(±0.5s), 6 period is 8.0s(±0.5s), 10 period is 13.4s(±0.5).

Average time to complete one period through averages of all trials:

Test Bob#1: Dimensions: 1cm x 2cm x 6cm

image23.pngimage17.pngAverage for the combined trials was 1.33s(±0.09s).

Test Bob#2: Dimensions: 2cm x 2cm x 3cm

image24.png

image17.pngAverage for the combined trials was 1.36s(±0.09s).

Test Bob#3: Dimensions: 1cm x 3cm x 4cm

image25.pngimage17.pngAverage for the combined trials was 1.36s(±0.09s).

Test Bob#4: Dimensions: 1.5cm x 2cm x 4cm

image25.pngimage17.pngAverage for the combined trials was 1.36s(±0.09s).

Test Bob#5: Dimensions: 1cm x 1.5cm x 8cm
image26.png

image17.pngAverage for the combined trials was 1.33s(±0.09s).

Chart 7: The average time taken to complete one period

Average Time to Complete One Period for Each Surface Area(Bob)

Surface Area Vs. Time

Test Bob #

(Surface Area)

Test Bob#1

(16cm²)

Test Bob#2

(20 cm²)

Test Bob#3

(30 cm²)

Test Bob#4

(22 cm²)

Test Bob#5

(27cm²)

Time(s)

1.33s(±0.09s)

1.36s(±0.09s)

1.36s(±0.09s)

1.36s(±0.09s)

1.33s(±0.09s)

image28.png

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

  1. Investigate the factors affecting the period of a double string pendulum

    ?0.21 Trial 3 (s) ?0.21 Trial 4 (s) ?0.21 Trial 5 (s) ?0.21 Average (s) 2 4 6 8 10 12 The digital timer I used only had 2 decimal places and it therefore had an error of ?0.01 seconds. In addition to this I also had to account for my human error reaction speed of ?0.2 seconds making a grand total of ?0.21 seconds to each trial.

  2. Simple pendulum lab. In this experiment, the length of the string will be ...

    + (Uncertainty 2) X 100 (Value 1) (Value 2) 0.2 + 0.001 X 100 1.52 0.535 = 9.14 ms-2 �13.3 % = 13.3 X 9.14 100 = �1.21562 = 9.14 ms-2 � 1 ms-2 Average of Gravity = 9.14 + 9.17 + 8.64 + 9.22 + 8.99 + 8.42 + 7.70 + 7.34 8 = 8.56 ms-2

  1. Suspension Bridges. this extended essay is an investigation to study the variation in tension ...

    (x), y and tension calculated for lengths 148 cm and 152 cm 16 Graphs Graph 1 Shows Tension vs Point of Application of Force for nylon string of length 140 cm 18 Graph 2 Shows Tension vs Point of Application of Force for elastic band of length 140 cm 19

  2. Investigating Magnetic Pendulum

    As we can see he comparison chart above, the values for directions A, B, C and D are almost same, with very minuscule micro second differences. The possible uncertainty here can be human error in timing the experiment and secondly, the quality of magnets i.e.

  1. This lab will test the effects of the surface area factor on acceleration due ...

    Materials - Standard Testing Stop Watch (Measured to the Nearest 0.01s) - Standard Measuring Tape (Measured to the Nearest 0.1 cm) - Ruled Sheets of Paper by Media Inc. Diagram: Procedure * The following procedure will be performed after every transformed surface area.

  2. Physics Wave revision question

    Transverse wave (2) ..................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................... (b) State one example, other than a wave on a string, of a transverse wave. ..................................................................................................................................... (1) A transverse wave is travelling along a string that is under tension. The diagram below shows the displacement of part of the string at time t = 0.

  1. Investigating the Oscillations of an Obstructed Pendulum

    This would have resulted in a systematic error as the air resistance would have been constant throughout the experiment, and would have shifted all of the results uniformly. Moreover, the standing clamps sometimes used to become slanted and sometimes were not completely vertical; this was the case as the standing

  2. How does the sinkage depth of a tyre affect its rolling resistance ?

    shows the data that establishes the relationship between rolling resistance of the bicycle and the sinkage depth of the tire on the sand bed. The relationship is found to be linear and is the only linear relationship in the whole experiment .

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work