• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do we have to learn to think scientifically in order to find the truth?

Extracts from this document...


Anna Markmann 11.03.04 Do we have to learn to think scientifically in order to find the truth? After a confrontation with this question a lot more questions seem to "pop out"- What is truth? What is the truth? What is scientific thinking and does it automatically lead to a truth or the truth or the truths? Can truth or truths be found? Do we need to know the truth? ... The amount of connected questions increases proportional with the amount of time you spend on finding an answer to the main question. This is because there are so many assumptions in this concept. Therefore a need of defining key words occurs. Though defining terms is very central it is highly problematical and difficult. After thinking of what the most important concepts in this question might be and deciding on truth and science, I interpreted truth as a temporarily not falsified concept or idea with respect to certain factors. ...read more.


So do actually need then to satisfy the human desire of finding the truth? On one hand we can not satisfy this desire practically, but on the other hand truth and science play a major role in our every day life (even if we would just write down a list of all the science we believed and trusted today, it would several pages long), since human beings are based on their beliefs, we are satisfied if we at least try. This is why science interferes with "scienceless" subjects such as history, arts and religion, too. One point of view is that there is a lot of science for example in the arts: our perception of paintings that follow the golden section principle, beauty, or music scales seem harmonic, but can be seen as pure mathematical concepts. ...read more.


or falsified and the process continues starting again with observing experimental data. Seems to be too clear and transparent in the first place, but there are also clearly a lot of problems, limitations and uncertainties connected to this process: paradigms and categories can distort your observation and are influenced by knowledge, language, culture, gender, age, etc. Moreover there can be a lack in creativity and induction be present. As well as falsification is an almost unbreakable vicious circle. To conclude: I am not able to answer this question adequately in my point of view, because no concept is just black and white as discussed above, contains errors and limitations, hence there are partial truths which may count as the truth after combination, so that I just can say that I need so many other mentioned and not mentioned concepts that I do not know how to do justice to this complex question since there are so many paradoxes. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. strength and limitations of quantitative and qualitative data

    Two psychologists, Elizabeth Spelke and Renee Baillargeon, ran an experiment and described their observations about babies by asserting that "before they are six months old, babies have figured out that objects consist of parts that move together, are aware of the difference between living and non-living things, and can even do simple arithmetic."

  2. Truth.People think that truth is relative because they could look at others points of ...

    Some other sources also played a big role in changing the truth, like media, other countries, etc. Some people would say that truth is relative in this case, but it is not because here are the two peoples killing each other not knowing what happened originally in these lands or changing the facts.

  1. Difference of Truth and knowldge

    Even though a person can reach a conclusion through experiments and research, that conclusion is not necessarily correct. Science, in my opinion, attempts to understand why things happen the way they do and as a result theories are constantly changing.

  2. Do we learn more from the arts or the sciences?

    On the other hand, strive for acceptance and objectivity is seen in the sciences. In order to avoid being just one of many yet to be proven theories, scientists must strive for accuracy and objectivity that the majority can acknowledge of.

  1. The question of truth

    They could be complete figments of our imagination just as easily as non-thinking things. But now that all these different things have been ruled as "not necessarily in existence," how can one be sure that they, themselves, exist? At first it seems like a difficult question, and Lord knows that

  2. Tok vocabularies - defining terms like "Truth" and "Belief"

    For example, when I want to say that UFOs exist, I should provide positive evidence such as photography or a video. There should also be evidence to prove that the photo and the video are not manipulated. By saying that there is no evidence to prove that UFOs don?t exist does not make the fact that UFOs exist true.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work