• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow. Consider knowledge issues raised by this statement in two areas of knowledge.

Extracts from this document...


?That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.? Consider knowledge issues raised by this statement in two areas of knowledge. by Ashish Raj Theory of Knowledge ABA ? An IB world School May 2014 Advisor: Ms Leona West Word Count: 1498 To understand what beliefs that have been accepted to be true can remain as knowledge and what that has been accepted as knowledge cant, this essay will explore the certainty of knowledge in two areas of knowledge; science and history. The knowledge issues that arises in science is to what extent can we be certain of the knowledge that is obtained from the scientific method whereas the other knowledge issue in history is to what extent can we prioritize one primary witness over another. The primal essence of the scientific method that very much defines science is Inductivism. Inductivism is the use of inductive reasoning, a form of reasoning in which the premise of the reasoning moves from the specific to more general. Students who take IB Physics are familiar with this kind of reasoning when they have to design a lab. ...read more.


Hence the knowledge that we have today would be flawed. Similarly, the knowledge from today might be derived as a result of valid argument with false premises in which it would need change from time to time. In history an important distinction has to be made between the events of the past and the knowledge of the events of the past. The past cannot be changed as it is objective and to an extent because of this premise many historians consider history to be more objective than science. ?In a very real sense the study of history is concerned with a subject matter more objective and independent than that of the natural science. Just because historical matter is in the past is gone ...its objective reality is guaranteed. It is beyond altered for any purpose whatsoever.? - G.R Elton However on the other hand the knowledge of the past is subject to change. The knowledge of the past is obtained mainly from the interpretations of the events in accounted by the primary witness and secondary witness. The problems start to arise when there are varying accounts of one event and the historian has to choose one in order to develop interpretation of an event. ...read more.


The present knowledge of the event was changed several times since the police had to choose the prioritization of primary witness to interpret an event. Coming to the conclusion of this essay although Inductivism as of now is a fairly complex method to prove a belief as knowledge, the shortcomings in the initial phase i.e. observation might make the conclusion that is derived from this observation erroneous. Due to this the initial observation would need to be revisited and makes us question the certainty of the knowledge that is hence derived from the observations we have made. Hence the knowledge that has been derived inductively due to this inaccurate observation would change. History on the other hand has knowledge based accounts of primary and secondary witness. The issue commonly faced by historians is to prioritize to choose which witness over another. The choice of the account of the primary witness will then lead to a series of interpretations based on the witness. However if the conclusion that arises from this interpretation is erroneous then the knowledge has to be changed from scratch as the base of the knowledge chosen by the historians is dependent on the account of the primary and secondary witness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Doubt is the key to all knowledge. To what extent is this true in ...

    So it seems unlikely that doubt will be hardly a key, which serves to disclose, or explain what is unknown. Consequently, Science is not affected by ways of knowing such as emotion or language because logical reasoning is largely universal.

  2. Theory of knowledge essay outline

    The essay connects directly with its knowledge issue by clearly restating in every topic sentence the important of our senses and the debate on why we should trust or not our senses. We are able to discuss different ways of knowing each with its counter claim in order to process

  1. Identify and Explore the Philosophical Issues Raised in The Truman Show

    So is the pleasure of tens of millions worth, the freedom of one man? This dilemma is almost unanswerable and highlights two of the major flaws of utilitarianism; the first is the subjectivity of pleasure. Pleasure is not something which can be calculated and compared (despite the attempts of the hedonic calculator)

  2. TOK - Accepted Conventions

    As the International Baccalaureate demands, students must become more open-minded to new ideas and cultivate their acceptance. Challenging these conventions not only allows us to discover "truth" for ourselves, but also question and cultivate our morality and ethics. Is this what one is supposed to do? Is it morally correct?

  1. Doubt is the key to knowledge (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true ...

    Physicists also did not conclude the rules of speed, acceleration, momentum, force and work....etc, they modified the doubts of previous Physicists and added to them their doubts according to statements true for them, and also true for others, even though new physicians try to use previous doubts and their doubts

  2. To what extent are areas of knowledge shaped by their past? Consider with reference ...

    However, current religious knowledge is not completely determined by religious knowledge of the past because discrepancies in the sharing of this knowledge alter it slightly from generation to generation. Religious texts attempt to convey their beliefs through written language but as language itself evolves over time, the nuances of some ancient phrases and words recede into obscurity.

  1. Can we know when to trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider ...

    Not all soldiers are tyrants nor are all mothers caring. We have example of Sophocles? Medea who kills all her children to avenge her pride. And we have examples of capitalist that were filled with the milk of human kindness.

  2. Doubt is the key to knowledge ( Persian Proverb ). To what extent is ...

    Which notion should we agree with? In my opinion, we should not follow the steadfast dictates of the moralists blindly, as doubting them will certainly give us a better perspective and a broader outlook on the things that some consider indisputable. For centuries, the maxim that a person?s black sin was due to sins committed in his/her previous lives was accepted blindly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work