• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow. Consider knowledge issues raised by this statement in two areas of knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.? Consider knowledge issues raised by this statement in two areas of knowledge. by Ashish Raj Theory of Knowledge ABA ? An IB world School May 2014 Advisor: Ms Leona West Word Count: 1498 To understand what beliefs that have been accepted to be true can remain as knowledge and what that has been accepted as knowledge cant, this essay will explore the certainty of knowledge in two areas of knowledge; science and history. The knowledge issues that arises in science is to what extent can we be certain of the knowledge that is obtained from the scientific method whereas the other knowledge issue in history is to what extent can we prioritize one primary witness over another. The primal essence of the scientific method that very much defines science is Inductivism. Inductivism is the use of inductive reasoning, a form of reasoning in which the premise of the reasoning moves from the specific to more general. Students who take IB Physics are familiar with this kind of reasoning when they have to design a lab. ...read more.

Middle

Hence the knowledge that we have today would be flawed. Similarly, the knowledge from today might be derived as a result of valid argument with false premises in which it would need change from time to time. In history an important distinction has to be made between the events of the past and the knowledge of the events of the past. The past cannot be changed as it is objective and to an extent because of this premise many historians consider history to be more objective than science. ?In a very real sense the study of history is concerned with a subject matter more objective and independent than that of the natural science. Just because historical matter is in the past is gone ...its objective reality is guaranteed. It is beyond altered for any purpose whatsoever.? - G.R Elton However on the other hand the knowledge of the past is subject to change. The knowledge of the past is obtained mainly from the interpretations of the events in accounted by the primary witness and secondary witness. The problems start to arise when there are varying accounts of one event and the historian has to choose one in order to develop interpretation of an event. ...read more.

Conclusion

The present knowledge of the event was changed several times since the police had to choose the prioritization of primary witness to interpret an event. Coming to the conclusion of this essay although Inductivism as of now is a fairly complex method to prove a belief as knowledge, the shortcomings in the initial phase i.e. observation might make the conclusion that is derived from this observation erroneous. Due to this the initial observation would need to be revisited and makes us question the certainty of the knowledge that is hence derived from the observations we have made. Hence the knowledge that has been derived inductively due to this inaccurate observation would change. History on the other hand has knowledge based accounts of primary and secondary witness. The issue commonly faced by historians is to prioritize to choose which witness over another. The choice of the account of the primary witness will then lead to a series of interpretations based on the witness. However if the conclusion that arises from this interpretation is erroneous then the knowledge has to be changed from scratch as the base of the knowledge chosen by the historians is dependent on the account of the primary and secondary witness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Theory of knowledge essay outline

    * Maybe it really is all just some false reality. But it is OUR reality. And our reality relies on our senses. Essay Criteria A: Understanding knowledge issues Throughout this essay outline I was able to fulfill the first criteria because it constantly refers to the senses, its reliability and truth.

  2. Doubt is the key to knowledge (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true ...

    so by illustrating his doubts and finding out the most appropriate one of them, he discovered that all of us can walk on the ground and everything on this earth is pulled to the ground floor by a force which is gravitational force with a constant speed of 9.8, so

  1. Knowledge is generated through the interaction of critical and creative thinking. Evaluate this statement ...

    This part of the investigation delves more into the human sciences area. Suspects are interviewed and interrogated in order to bring more knowledge about the case.

  2. Theory of Knowledge Essay

    These simple examples show that our senses are only able to take up a fraction of the information available in the world around us. The next filter is the convertion into electrical impulses and their procession into the brain. In a very simplistic way this can be described as the convertion of outside information through physical (e.g.

  1. TOK Essay - Can we trust reason in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider 2 ...

    Famous Deontologist Immanuel Kant, maintained that one?s ethics should purely be based on reason and not on human inclinations, emotions and consequences of one?s actions. He argued that Man is the only living being with a propensity towards reasoned thought and action, and thus should use such a faculty to determine one?s moral code.

  2. Can we know when to trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider ...

    What do we feel when we see a spider? The very image of the spider fills us with an emotion of disgust and within twinkling of a second we kill it although we know that it is not a tarantula.

  1. Theory of Knowledge: There is no distinction between true or false. Discuss

    There have been a lot of arguments about Euthanasia. Netherlands has been the most liberal assisted suicide laws in the world followed by Holland that has legalized it since 2001. Despite the religious leaders, UK has accepted it. The Death with Dignity Act of 1994, Oregon, USA, where the assisted

  2. That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider some of ...

    This human endeavor to gain correct knowledge gives rise to a knowledge issue: to what extent can I believe if the knowledge claim offered tomorrow will be discarded tomorrow or not? How do I know that the knowledge I have today is complete in itself?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work