• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There is no such thing as a consistent ethical point of view: in reality, everyone's ethics are a mixture, if not a muddle." To what extent do you agree? A personal response

Extracts from this document...


"There is no such thing as a consistent ethical point of view: in reality, everyone's ethics are a mixture, if not a muddle." To what extent do you agree? There are many different standard ethical points of view. These include consequentialism, deontologism, ethical nihilism, ethical relativism, egoism and utilitarianism. Some might say that 'there is no such thing as a consistent ethical point of view' and that, 'in reality, everyone's ethics are a mixture if not a muddle.' This essay examines this belief by firstly considering what constitutes a 'consistent ethical point of view' and to what extent it is possible to live your life by any one ethical viewpoint. One could argue that a person who has an ethical point of view which they do not change and does not contradict itself would have a 'consistent ethical point of view'. However, the statement uses the term 'consistent ethical point of view' to mean a 'standard, defined ethical point of view'. ...read more.


Neither egoism nor altruism support moral absolutism but they are part of consequentialism (a branch of moral absolutism). Egoism says that whatever is right for the individual is the ethical choice, whilst altruism claims that the best action is the one which benefits the community rather than the individual. Nihilism says that there is no such thing as right or wrong and no action is ethically better or worse than any other. These are just a few of the many 'standard' ethical viewpoints. The statement claims that no-one follows just one of these points of view, but instead follow a mixture of standard ethical views. A number of ethical viewpoints would be impossible to follow consistently in certain circumstances due to internal paradoxes. For example, deontology outlines certain rights (such as the right not to be harmed in certain ways expressed by Kamm's Principle of Permissible Harm). Consider a case where someone has maliciously sent a trolley hurtling towards 5 innocent and immobile people at the end of a track. ...read more.


Many say that stealing is wrong, arbitrarily - but when asked to consider whether it is wrong for a starving person to steal food knowing that there is no other opportunity to feed themselves, they 'make an exception' or at least have to reconsider. However, moral absolutism by definition can have no 'exceptions', so here it is demonstrated that the person is living by a mixture of ethical points of view. Another example of this would be with divine command ethics where people claim to follow them but make little exceptions, whether it be on contraception, human rights or other issues. I would conclude that the majority have a mixed set of ethics. Indeed, I myself have a somewhat convoluted mixture of relativism, egoism and nihilism as the basis of my personal ethics. However, it would be very bold to say that no-one has a standard moral viewpoint due to the sheer magnitude of the Earth's population. Despite this most people do have a mixture of standard ethics to make their personal values and ethics, even if they believe they don't. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent should our actions be guided by our theories in ethics and ...

    This method provides a logical and rational argument for each decision and allows a person to use it on a case-by-case basis. However, the problem here is that the future consequences are not always so predictable. Considering this, we can't be certain that following the theory will lead us to the greatest benefit.

  2. All knowledge claims should be open to rational criticism. On what grounds and to ...

    together with rational criticism in order to establish new truths which may lead to a more subjective approach to mathematics.

  1. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    in the evening, therefore it seemed that the sun orbits the earth. For people in that day and age, it seemed true. The geocentric model was considered as an accurate portrayal of reality. Just like atoms and molecules and such for us today. What if the atoms are portrayed wrong?

  2. Examine the ethical issues in vivisection and discuss the extent to which it should ...

    sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth", reiterating the belief that humans have more rights than animals and we, therefore, should be allowed to exploit them.

  1. Reliability of Sigmund Freud's claims

    Bearing the name of science, it is required that it follows the scientific method, and uses an approach in which only one factor is changed, ceteris paribus, in order to see the impact on a dependent variable. The reliability of the drawn conclusions depend on the extent to which the

  2. Abortion: Ethical or Not?

    Utilitarianism, a philosophical theory concerned with the benefits for the greatest number of people, can also be used to justify the morality of abortion in certain cases. The obvious case in which utilitarianism applies to abortion is in situations like rape.

  1. The need to belong marks us as human and it is such connections that ...

    As a teenager, he struggles to deal with the experiences and perceptions of his life. The recurring motif throughout the story is the sense of loneliness. It appears as if he desires to remain alone in order to detach from society as he often sabotages his own attempts to end his loneliness.

  2. Discuss the view that we cannot justify absolutist moral rules in a multi cultural ...

    Deontologists would not accept it because they have the absolute rule that killing is wrong. But in this case the patient has chosen to die because he does not want to live with the pain anymore. But the intention of the doctor and the relatives is to release him from pain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work