• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory of Knowledge Essay To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge? The common phrase, 'seeing is believing', implies the message that you can only believe in something once you have seen it with your own eyes. The topic question for this essay, to what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge, challenges the idea of whether we need to see something in order to confirm our beliefs; or if through other ways of knowing such as reason, language and emotion we can support and trust in our own beliefs and ideals. This topic forces you to question the trust you have in yourself, in other people and in the world around you; it makes you think about the different areas of knowledge and to what extent we need different types of evidence to eliminate any doubts in our minds. For the purpose of this essay I am going to define the term 'evidence' as physical evidence, examples of this type of evidence can range from fossils to written accounts of events. The knowledge we gain from this type of evidence is empirical knowledge, we interact with the evidence through sense perception. I would also like to define the term 'beliefs' as your personal opinions on a particular issue/subject; deciding whether something is real or fictitious. ...read more.

Middle

Next I would like to evaluate history as an area of knowledge. In history there is a need for physical evidence to confirm and validate events that have taken place in the past. History, in this sense, is a difficult area of knowledge to fully grasp and understand as for the most part we were not there to witness the events we believe to have taken place. We are uncovering and learning more about our history each day, but there are still many blank spaces. For historians some of the most important and accurate information comes from primary source documents, written accounts of events from people who witnessed the event take place. I have included documents to the definition of physical evidence, however you must be careful about biases that may affect the validity of the evidence and the area of knowledge itself. The arousal of biases prompted my next knowledge issue, to what extent do biases affect the validity of the evidence? History, as an area of knowledge, can be passed down primarily through language. Language allows us to expand beyond our experience and learn about events in the past and in other areas of the world. Language as a way of knowing can become biased because the views told can be affected by the person's opinion. ...read more.

Conclusion

Implications that could arise based on my arguments and claims that history and natural sciences need evidence to support people's beliefs suggest that creativity and the childhood happiness from the use of imagination is a bad thing. Quite frankly, I think that we would live in a pretty boring world if people were forced to prove everything; and I don't think we would have progressed nearly as far as we have. An assumption I have made is that evidence that is not physical is less valid than non empirical evidence. I have taken this stance because that is my own personal opinion and I recognize that other people, perhaps those who are from a different culture, age or gender may have different views. To conclude, this topic has made me both doubt and confirm my own sense of belief in the knowledge areas, and in my life. I questioned whether it is harmful or beneficial to accept things as they are? And does that illustrate a lack of interest or judgment? I don't have a definite answer, but I think it's important to have a balance of both - I think it's actually quite refreshing to be able to both have the need for and not need evidence at the same time . No one can live their life searching for, or requesting proof to every question or doubt, it's just impractical, and sometimes there isn't any, we just need to have a little faith. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Doubt is the key to all knowledge. To what extent is this true in ...

    Yet in field of pure, theoretical mathematic, the doubt is again a valuable tool to acquire new knowledge. Until recently, one of the most pursued mathematic theories was the Fermat's Last Theorem. I saw the video about the theorem which highly intrigued me to look further into the challenge it brought to mathematicians.

  2. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does ...

    How people interpret the word embryo will influence their perception concerning abortion. Some people are not influenced emotionally by abortion, probably because they consider an embryo to be a ball of cells. Whatever human's interpretation of abortion are there are no proofs that an embryo is an unborn child, therefore

  1. The extent and type of our language defines our knowledge of the world. Do ...

    and many other subjects, regardless the language in which he is learning. Generally we know things because we are familiar with them because of experiences or what we have been told.

  2. People Need To Believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events

    atom can turn into a proton and an electron, although they do not know how this happens as they are aware of that the reverse is impossible since a neutron is not made up of a proton and an electron.1 This has simply been explained by stating something as unscientific

  1. Doubt is the key to knowledge (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true ...

    different doubts helped in investigating his death and also let all who were supporting him know the way he killed himself so they all know the whole truth about the leader who they cared about. So history shows a good relationship between doubt and justification of historical facts and events

  2. Salt, governments, beliefs, and celebrity couples are a few examples of things that can ...

    It instills confidence and helps us eliminate fear. The bible says that while Peter, john and James, along with Jesus, were climbing down the mount of transfiguration, they accosted a poor man carrying a baby possessed by a demon. When His disciples were unable to exorcize the evil spirit, Jesus came forward and cast the demon out.

  1. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    From the human comparitier level, the ramdom variation of each of these genes and their unique combinatory permutaions, creates no two individuals alike. This scientific genetic determinim seems to be at the core of what one really is. Inductive and deductive reasoning have placed ?Homo Homo Sapiens? at the forefront of evolution.

  2. Doubt is the key to knowledge ( Persian Proverb ). To what extent is ...

    If this hypothesis is not falsified, it can be provisionally accepted, till the time future tests falsify it. Studying chemistry through middle school has ?undoubtedly? proven to be a blessing in disguise while writing this essay (though not in improving my overall academic grade!)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work