• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory of Knowledge Essay To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge? The common phrase, 'seeing is believing', implies the message that you can only believe in something once you have seen it with your own eyes. The topic question for this essay, to what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge, challenges the idea of whether we need to see something in order to confirm our beliefs; or if through other ways of knowing such as reason, language and emotion we can support and trust in our own beliefs and ideals. This topic forces you to question the trust you have in yourself, in other people and in the world around you; it makes you think about the different areas of knowledge and to what extent we need different types of evidence to eliminate any doubts in our minds. For the purpose of this essay I am going to define the term 'evidence' as physical evidence, examples of this type of evidence can range from fossils to written accounts of events. The knowledge we gain from this type of evidence is empirical knowledge, we interact with the evidence through sense perception. I would also like to define the term 'beliefs' as your personal opinions on a particular issue/subject; deciding whether something is real or fictitious. ...read more.

Middle

Next I would like to evaluate history as an area of knowledge. In history there is a need for physical evidence to confirm and validate events that have taken place in the past. History, in this sense, is a difficult area of knowledge to fully grasp and understand as for the most part we were not there to witness the events we believe to have taken place. We are uncovering and learning more about our history each day, but there are still many blank spaces. For historians some of the most important and accurate information comes from primary source documents, written accounts of events from people who witnessed the event take place. I have included documents to the definition of physical evidence, however you must be careful about biases that may affect the validity of the evidence and the area of knowledge itself. The arousal of biases prompted my next knowledge issue, to what extent do biases affect the validity of the evidence? History, as an area of knowledge, can be passed down primarily through language. Language allows us to expand beyond our experience and learn about events in the past and in other areas of the world. Language as a way of knowing can become biased because the views told can be affected by the person's opinion. ...read more.

Conclusion

Implications that could arise based on my arguments and claims that history and natural sciences need evidence to support people's beliefs suggest that creativity and the childhood happiness from the use of imagination is a bad thing. Quite frankly, I think that we would live in a pretty boring world if people were forced to prove everything; and I don't think we would have progressed nearly as far as we have. An assumption I have made is that evidence that is not physical is less valid than non empirical evidence. I have taken this stance because that is my own personal opinion and I recognize that other people, perhaps those who are from a different culture, age or gender may have different views. To conclude, this topic has made me both doubt and confirm my own sense of belief in the knowledge areas, and in my life. I questioned whether it is harmful or beneficial to accept things as they are? And does that illustrate a lack of interest or judgment? I don't have a definite answer, but I think it's important to have a balance of both - I think it's actually quite refreshing to be able to both have the need for and not need evidence at the same time . No one can live their life searching for, or requesting proof to every question or doubt, it's just impractical, and sometimes there isn't any, we just need to have a little faith. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent should our actions be guided by our theories in ethics and ...

    In physics, Maxwell's electromagnetism and Newtonian physics have proven to be inconsistent and incompatible with modern technological development, e.g. computing. At the extreme margins of microscopic levels and hi-speed near the speed of light are where these theories fail to meet the level of complexity to explain reality, thus becoming unreliable.

  2. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does ...

    How people interpret the word embryo will influence their perception concerning abortion. Some people are not influenced emotionally by abortion, probably because they consider an embryo to be a ball of cells. Whatever human's interpretation of abortion are there are no proofs that an embryo is an unborn child, therefore

  1. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does ...

    If the knowledge we discovered until now are incorrect, the new statements are still objective because it is not an invention. Mathematics is a subject which involves high accuracy, one mistake will cause your answers to be incorrect, so there is only one set of correct answers and therefore objective knowledge is achieved.

  2. Which is the more important attribute of the historian: the ability to analyse evidence ...

    Consequently, I can conclude that neither the ability to analyze scientifically nor the ability to develop interpretations is the single most important attribute of a historian, it's the link between both of them that aids the historian to form high-quality and reliable conclusions.

  1. Doubt is the key to all knowledge. To what extent is this true in ...

    the living cells under the microscope, Hooke concluded that the observed phenomenon was indeed cell division (L. Wolpert). However, at times biologist believed that they were observing cell division, but he could have been seeing something else. Robert Hooke and his colleagues could have seen a mutated cell, or simply

  2. TOK: Religious beliefs

    to ignore - and if fundamentalism were to arise, kill people belonging to - other religions. Some religious pluralists seem witless of this fact, by preaching the acceptance of all religions they are actively engaging in building up a nuclear war4; as religious beliefs-at their core- do not believe in the truth of any other religion.

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    We see Jane?s knowledge and understanding of this when she is hesitant of marrying Rochester. She knows she loves him but she knows she feels like she?ll be holding him back if she agrees. And she only does agree to marry him when she comes into her late uncle?s wealth.

  2. Can we have beliefs or knowledge, which are independent of our culture?

    However, is history is always so biased that we cannot believe on? Not all parts of history can be stated as falsifying us, but we need to be assured that the matter that is presented is properly checked and verified.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work