How Invisible Characters in Ghosts and Oedipus Rex Affect the Future of Their Male Children (World Lit.)

Authors Avatar

How Invisible Characters in Ghosts and Oedipus Rex Affect the Future of Their Male Children

Lavota Carter

5/14/09 per 7-8 MTuTh

World Lit. Essay

Word Count: 1300

The invisible characters King Laius and Mr. Alvings, in the plays Oedipus Rex and Ghosts respectively influence the future of their offspring. The past decisions of these fathers lead the boys on a downward spiral to failure. In the novel Oedipus Rex, Oedipus, the protagonist, tries to escape the prophesized fate he had just been made aware of. The attempt is futile, because he had already completed more than half of it. Oedipus’s imminent fulfillment of the prophecy stems from his father’s, King Laius, efforts to eliminate him as a young child. The character Oswald, from Ghosts, is set up for failure, because of his father’s infidelity. Oswald’s “inner sickness”, syphilis, and the failure of his love interest, Regina, are a result of Mr. Alvings’s past affairs. Both fathers affect their children’s’ adult lives negatively. They do all this with no appearance in either play, only mentioned.

King Laius’s attempt to have Oedipus left for dead, sets in motion Oedipus’s tragedy. In Antistrophe II Jocasta tries to console her new husband when the seer, Tiresias, lets loose that he is the former king’s murderer. To accomplish this she says,

Once long ago there came to Laius/from—let’s not suppose Apollo personally/ but from one of his ministers—an oracle,/ which said that fate would make him meet his end/ through a son, a son of his and mine./Well, there was a murder, yes,/but done by brigands in another land, they say/ Where three highways meet,/ and secondly, the son, not three days old,/ Is left by Laius (through other hands, of course)/ upon a trackless hillside,/ his ankles riveted together./ So there Apollo fails to make the son/ his father’s murderer, and the father/ (Laius sick with dread) murdered by his son. [Sic]                

Join now!

In the passage Jocasta is telling Oedipus not to worry and that he can not be the killer. First of all she has heard he had been killed by a group of foreigners. Secondly, her husband was destined to be defeated by one of his own making. That predestined son was left for dead in an abandoned area, with no way to defend itself against the elements and wild creatures.   If Jocasta’s second reason had been true Oedipus would have been in the clear.

        Jocasta’s second detail did not quite come to pass. The baby never made it to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay