• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Compare and contrast the ethical issues raised by Milgram's experiments on obedience and Zimbardo's prison experiment'.

Extracts from this document...


Tom Fairfield 'Compare and contrast the ethical issues raised by Milgram's experiments on obedience and Zimbardo's prison experiment' The Zimbardo experiment took place in the summer of 1971 in Stanford University, California, and is one of the most famous contemporary social-psychological experiments. It was presided over by Philip Zimbardo and involved a group of eighteen students, nine of whom were assigned the role of prison warders and the remaining nine as prisoners. The basement of the university was turned in to a prison complete with recording surveillance equipment. The experiment was originally meant to last two weeks but was halted prematurely after six days. Zimbardo had become increasingly concerned by the behaviour of both prisoners and wardens, one of the volunteer prisoners describing the guards as 'Nazis'. Stanley Milgram's study on the conflict between obedience and personal conscience took place in 1965 and was equally controversial. The experiment was 'officially' about learning and memory. Volunteers were assigned the role of 'teacher' delivering electric shocks to 'learners' under the premise that they were exploring the effects of punishment on learning behaviour. The 'learners' unbeknown to the 'teachers' were actors. The 'teachers' were asked to administer electric shocks of increasing intensity as 'learners' gave incorrect answers to questions. All of the participants gave shocks of at least 300 volts to the learners. ...read more.


Symptoms were observed that were similar to those of a nervous breakdown. It is certain that volunteers in both experiments suffered psychologically and in the case of Zimbardo's experiment physically. Being led to believe that you are giving near fatal electric shocks to people and cleaning the inside of a toilet bowl with bare hands are both traumatic. The rebellion started by inmates in Zimbardo's experiment was put down with the use of carbon dioxide fire extinguishers. The longevity of both experiments itself poses an ethical question; Milgram's experiments went ahead even when 'the pattern of reluctant and pained obedience began to emerge'. Zimbardo admitted that, 'although we ended the study a week earlier than planned, we did not end it soon enough'. This raises the question of whether some form of independent monitor is ethically necessary in such experiments. Zimbardo's experiment had already been viewed by many people in his department and from other outsiders, however it was only when Professor Christina Maslach observed the experiment that Zimbardo heard moral objection to it. Maslach has explained that the circumstances of her disapproval were that she was both romantically involved with Zimbardo and not working for him as a graduate student or colleague. If these explanations for her behaviour are to be given credibility, Zimbardo's staff are also worthy of a study in obedience. ...read more.


11) Although sociologists, like other researchers are committed to the advancement of knowledge, that goal does not, of itself, provide an entitlement to override the rights of others. This last point generally covers the ethical dilemma that surfaces when research in the nature of Milgram and Zimbardo's is undertaken. Do the means justify the end? The theoretical Utilitarian response to Milgram's work would be a positive one. For the experiments could be interpreted as benefiting the many at the expense of the few. This conforms to the utilitarian basic principle of 'greatest happiness for the greatest number'. Therefore the psychological pain, which the volunteers went through, was necessary to benefit the rest of society. This is a difficult theory to accept however as it can be attributed to all scientific research which would benefit everybody. Perhaps tellingly this can be related back to the original inspiration of Milgram's research, the treatment of Jews in the Second World War. Experiments carried out on Jewish prisoners in the war benefited the advance of science greatly. However very few people would see the pain and suffering of these people as a valid sacrifice for the benefit of wider society. I will conclude this essay with the thoughts of Zimbardo: "The ethical point is legitimate insofar as whom are you, as an experimenter, to give a person that kind of information about oneself. But my feeling is that that's the most valuable kind of information that you can have � and that certainly a society needs it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Psychometrics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Psychometrics essays

  1. Compare and contrast qualitative and quantitative approaches to research

    It is the patient's choice to be in a randomised trial. Randomisation is done to ensure that the results they get are correct and not bias and occurring by chance (Altman and Bland 1999). The study by Girou (2002) uses the term randomised clinical trial in its title.

  2. Critically evaluate the ethical precautions incorporated into the Stanford Prison Experiment

    However, the prison simulation procedures were more detrimental than expected - subjects received a surprise arrest by city police outside their homes in conjunction with a humiliating prison induction procedure and brutal treatment from the subjects adopting the role of a 'guard'.

  1. Essay Questions Concerning Deception in Stanley Milgram Research.

    If there had not been so much deception used in Milgram's experiment participants would have been protected and would not have suffered any mental adverseness after the experiment had taken place. The resulting effects of the experiment was solely due to the use of deception c)

  2. Conformity and Obedience

    to get them in, then once they were there they felt almost obliged to carry out the instructions they were being given, the participants were obedient, but Milgram used entrapment to get them into that position first. Deindividuation explains aggression in terms of the reduction of inhibition against antisocial behaviour when individuals are part of a group.

  1. A consideration of the ends justifying the means of Milgram's research into obedience.

    Obviously, the participants would be more inclined to administer the shocks if they knew they were fakes. Video evidence does however suggest that the participants did think the shocks were real since 70% of them said that they believed. This points to high experimental validity.

  2. Milgram's study of obedience has been influential in the development of 'ethics'. Discuss the ...

    During the experiment the confederate made increasingly more errors. The confederate pretended the shocks were real by crying out in pain and claiming he had chest pains. Milgram and his team urged the participants to continue despite all of this, and the experiment was only terminated if the participant refused to go on four times.

  1. The present experiment aimed to demonstrate that group discussion modifies personal opinion

    Topic five showed a mean increase toward the group mean of 0.1, but a standard deviation of 0.88 again indicating high variability. Figure 1 Mean shift scores for discussed and non-discussed topics. The error bars represent standard deviation. Figure 1 shows the two levels of the manipulated variable, in which the variability of the shift scores is clear.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent do the 'ends' justify the 'means' in ethically objectionable experiments such ...

    The British Psychological Society and American Psychological Association, now ensure that we have set specific standards to cover most situations encountered as psychologists (APA 2006). In research experiments such as Milgram's, it is important to receive full informed consent from participants, and also keep the level of deception to a minimum (Howitt & Cramer 2005).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work